Posted by guilt-ridden liberal, a resident of another community, on Jul 2, 2012 at 9:52 am
I personally have been losing sleep at night over the prospect of Obama-supported ACA providing health care to 30 million Americans who didn't have it before the Act. So much guilt!
Ah, but as George Mitchell said this week-end, health care for 30 million Americans isn't the issue. Rather, the real issue is Obama's likelihood of getting re-elected by the American people. In light of this, we need to throw any infantile crappola up at the wall in order to make it stick in hopes of unseating this guilt tripper president who isn't black but who isn't white either.
Posted by Half and half, a resident of the Birdland neighborhood, on Jul 2, 2012 at 10:54 am
Never mind his incompetence, let's just focus on his race. Just like Eric holder, he's not incompetent, he's just being criticized for being black. Whatever helps you justify your reasons for excusiing these boobs. They can do no wrong, since affirmative action is the goal, not running the country lead by officials that are actually capable.
Posted by What's the alternative?, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Jul 5, 2012 at 12:57 pm
So what is the alternative to Obama? A guy that can't keep his story straight (Romney), who has also promised to undo Roe v Wade, who is likely to give in to the requests of the far right and appoint awful supreme court justices?
As much as I dislike Obama and his policies, I think I will have to vote AGAINST a candidate (Romney) who 1) promises to bring the country back in time as far as social issues go, 2) is against "Obamacare" when he himself passed the same legislature in MA when he was governor, the list goes on...
I will vote for Obama not because I like him or agree with his policies but because Romney can only make things worse and he will for sure set the country back on social issues (the fact that he met with Santorum says it all, doesn't it?)
the GOP did it again: selected such an awful candidate (remember the Palin fiasco in 2008?) that they are essentially forcing people to vote for Obama (or should we say "against a backwards GOP")?