Town Square

Post a New Topic

Change the council policy

Original post made by Tim Hunt on May 22, 2012

City Councilman Matt Sullivan's pulled few punches in his frank opinion in the most recent prior edition of the Pleasanton Weekly.
The councilman has a unique view of the power that local government should exert in what's supposed to be a free-market, capitalist system.
His public distaste for Walmart and his view that the City Council should determine how many supermarkets belong in the community were fortunately overturned by four other council members.
Incidentally, to his credit, this is not a new position on supermarkets. He also opposed the new Safeway on Bernal Avenue, a store that added a second shopping opportunity for residents on the southwest side of town, but also has cut into Raley's business.
For residents, however, Walmart and the new Safeway will offer both closer shopping for neighborhoods as well as additional choices for consumers.
In the aftermath of this protracted process, the council should re-examine and change one of its policies. The policy allows any single council member to postpone an item for one meeting. If that action takes place prior to a meeting, there's an argument to keep the policy.
But, for it to be used at the end of a three-hour public hearing, was violating the process. If a member wants an item held over when it's been on the agenda and discussed, then it should take a majority vote of the council to postpone a decision.
In this case, the Walmart issue boiled down to whether one grocery story can replace another grocery store—not what the corporate masthead reads.
Contrary to Matt's assertions, the circus unfortunately re-enforced Pleasanton's well-deserved reputation as a very difficult place to do business.

SPEAKING OF, things governmental, the regional control being exerted by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Association of Bay Area Governments smacks of "big brotherism" in the name of the environment.
The two regional agencies adopted a growth plan that is designed to cut air pollution to curb global warming by putting most new development along public transportation corridors.
The plan responds to legislation authored by Sen. Mark DeSaulnier that tied $277 billion in transportation funding to a plan to reduce air pollution—never mind that the air is vastly cleaner that it was 20 years ago to say nothing of when the feds passed the Clean Air Act in the early 1970s.
This is all about man-made global warming and exerting control.
A point to ponder: How well do our weather experts and scientists predict weather day-to-day, let alone week-to-week or month-to-month. And, climate scientists purport to understand both the trends (possible) and the causes (unlikely) of our world-wide climate.
It takes way more faith to believe in them than it does to believe in a Creator God.
One additional observation: the structure of the transportation commission and the regional government outfit creates huge immunity for the politicians. Who in Orinda is going to tie its vice-mayor, Amy Worth, to these policies? Same goes for Alameda County Supervisor Scott Haggerty.
The elected politicians are appointed to these powerful boards that have a huge impact on our daily lives, but never directly face the voters with their actions on regional boards in the discussion.

Comments

There are no comments yet, please share yours below.

If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

To post your comment, please click here to login

Remember me?
Forgot Password?
or register. This topic is only for those who have signed up to participate by providing their email address and establishing a screen name.

A Norman Rockwell Town
By Roz Rogoff | 6 comments | 1,274 views

David Brooks at his Best and Worst
By Tom Cushing | 8 comments | 831 views

Anti-fracking folks rail against railroads
By Tim Hunt | 21 comments | 712 views