Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Apr 3, 2012
I read in the paper this morning that Matt Sullivan has filed an appeal against the ruling to permit Walmart from opening the Neighhood Market in the old Nob Hill location. I, for one, strongly object to this appeal. Not only does it waste precious city $$, but stands in the way of Pleasanton moving forward with additional tax $$ coming into the city. So Matt, who's $$ are behind this backward thinking? You certainly think that the owner of this strip mall should be able to lease his/her business to whom ever they need (especially when the replacement is zoned for a market) to keep the funds coming in to maintain their places of business.
The owner has the right to conduct business in Pleasanton free from obstructionalism from one council member who is charged with the keeping the city moving forward & the welfare of all the residents of the city.
Who bought & paid this guy? It's time to consider a recall of Matt Sullivan, Obstructionalist!