Wal-Mart replacing Nob Hill
Original post made by Stacey, Amberwood/Wood Meadows, on Feb 12, 2012
The zoning administrator approved the application as there was nothing to trigger a design review. It's a grocery store replacing a grocery store. The decision can be appealed, yet for the Council to realistically overturn it (to avoid any potential lawsuit), they need someone to step forth with a legitimate reason for why the zoning administrator was wrong to approve the application; to show how the application does trigger a design review.
Any ideas? I'd be concerned if Wal-Mart did operate in a manner inconsistent with the existing Conditions for Approval. What recourse do we have if that ends up being the case?
Pleasanton resident will have his hands full trying to keep the Oakland teams
By Tim Hunt | 1 comment | 957 views
The House of Representatives performs history’s first repeat hara-kiri
By Tom Cushing | 0 comments | 335 views