Uncut VideoClip of Voter Fraud in New Hampshire State, National, International, posted by DemocratMachine, a resident of the Amador Estates neighborhood, on Jan 15, 2012 at 8:34 am
See for yourself. Voter fraud. The Democrat Party consistently blocks efforts to require ID verification at the voting booth. These efforts are also the result of ACORN and Project Vote...both with a focus on how to inflate the number of votes for Democrats.
Posted by Photo required, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Jan 15, 2012 at 5:13 pm
Every voter in the country should have a PHOTO voter ID card. Every person, including the masses on MedCal who go to Kaiser, must show a photo ID. ...Seems they're willing to get the photo to get their free medical care,...should be same to insure the INTEGRITY in voting in America....no stuffing the box, like 3rd world,
Posted by Trudy, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Jan 15, 2012 at 5:59 pm
I am not impressed with your link here, DemoMachine. Maybe it it my left coast bias, but I see New Hampshire as statistically insignificant. There are 465,000 more people living in Santa Clara county than in the entire state of New Hampshire. If fraud occurred in the 2012 New Hampshire presidential primary, let that state prove it, not your candid camera monkeys. The NH primary process is, IMHO, almost as ineffectual as Iowa's.
And how did you arrive at the conclusion that the Democrats are responsible for the efforts of this camera crew to violate federal voting laws?
Don't get me wrong -- voter fraud is appalling -- but the sky is not falling, people. At least, not in New Hampshire.
Posted by Sam, a resident of the Oak Hill neighborhood, on Jan 15, 2012 at 6:44 pm
Please. The video shows voting in the DEMOCRATIC primary, not in a Federal election. What do you conservatives care about the procedures used in a Democratic primary? Not long ago you conservatives were trying to corrupt the Democratic primaries by having Republican voters temporarily cross over and vote in the Democratic primaries for Hilary Clinton against Obama (I.e., Rush Limbaugh's "operation chaos"). Now you're getting sanctimonious and wagging your finger at "fraud" in the Democratic primaries? I'll bet you weren't so outraged at Rush Limbaugh's attempt to corrupt the primaries, were you? Hypocrite.
Posted by Stacey, a resident of the Amberwood/Wood Meadows neighborhood, on Jan 15, 2012 at 8:32 pm Stacey is a member (registered user) of PleasantonWeekly.com
I tried to look up about voter fraud in California. The State has a voter fraud investigative unit. While I didn't find any reports on the frequency, I did find this document which is said to contain "the more common Election Code violations" in California: Web Link Among the numerous "more common" violations one can find "Fraudulently voting in an election which one is not entitled." It would be helpful to have these "more common" violations quantified.
Posted by Stacey, a resident of the Amberwood/Wood Meadows neighborhood, on Jan 15, 2012 at 8:48 pm Stacey is a member (registered user) of PleasantonWeekly.com
Here's some statistics about dead people voting in California: Web Link
"In October, KTVU Channel 2 cross-checked California's state death registry record across voter lists in the nine Bay Area counties, finding that in eight elections in the last ten years, "232 people with death certificates had voted after they had died – some more than once." 153 of these cases were from one county, Alameda."
Posted by steve, a resident of the Parkside neighborhood, on Jan 16, 2012 at 9:40 am
Nice tactic, Janna. Try to discredit the messenger without addressing the issue. Do you dems ever use tactics that are not in the Alinksy playbook? No imagination.....
Next, you'll tell us that the Black Panthers in Phildelphia were not intimidating voters during the 2008 elections. Nope, no voter fraud, intimidation or coercion on the part of dems. Eric Holder said so......
Posted by Sam, a resident of the Oak Hill neighborhood, on Jan 16, 2012 at 12:40 pm
Janna simply gave a link which pointed out that these investigators committed voter fraud themselves. So why the irrational hostility Steve and DemocratMachine? Why don"t you condemn the tactics of these investigators? Seems like you both turn a blind eye to voter fraud when it's committed by conservatives. Please spare us from any further self-righteous conservative hypocrisy.
Posted by Sam, a resident of the Oak Hill neighborhood, on Jan 16, 2012 at 1:57 pm
Patriot, would you include Rush Limbaugh's "Operation Chaos" within your definition of "voter fraud"? Operation Chaos was a project in which Republican voters were encouraged to temporarily cross over and vote in the Democratic primaries against then-candidate Obama and for Hilary Clinton in order to disrupt the Democratic primaries (hence the name "Operation Chaos"). Was this not a deliberate attempt to corrupt the democratic voting process on a vastly greater scale than the "dead voters" issue raised here? It seems that if your concerns about "voter fraud" are sincere - and not just pious posturing as I suspect - you should be condemning large-scale attempts to corrupt the voting like "Operation Chaos".
Posted by Neil, a resident of the Downtown neighborhood, on Jan 18, 2012 at 9:49 am
The state of Cal routinely "loses" approx 100,000 ballots per national election on account of machine failures, human error, etc. Yet all the chicken littles are screaming about 232 "dead people" voting and an Acorn falling on their head. Might I suggest using your time to volunteer at Red Cross?