Town Square

Post a New Topic

Gay 'barbarians' descend on Marcus and Michele Bachmann's clinic

Original post made by kyle on Jul 22, 2011

If I remember correctly there was a thread concerning California becomes 1st state to require teaching of gay history. The contentions were brisk, but one side of the argument for teaching gay history was to reduce the violence against gays. There are two points I want to discuss with the Town Forum on the recent "Barbarian" actions against Michelle Bachmann:

1. Isn't the glittering of Michelle Bachmann's husbands office an intolerant and violent act against a group of people with different ideas. The same violent acts that gay individuals are against.

2. Michelle Bachmann is a member of the United States House of Representatives, representing Minnesota's 6th congressional district. Doesn't it set a terrible precedent if we allow or condone violence against any candidate running for political office. This is not a prank, this is a criminal act. An individual who threatened Nancy Pelosi was rightfully arrested and many were outraged. I would hope the same outrage crosses the isle.

MB does not represent my views. But I respect her right to run for office and voice her views peacefully without fear of violence. I do not feel she or her family should be dishonored with violence either on a personal level or political level. It sets a dangerous precedent.

Please be reasonable in your responses.

Comments (6)

Posted by Smiley, a resident of Happy Valley
on Jul 22, 2011 at 6:07 am

For me it depends. What color was the glitter?


Posted by steve, a resident of Parkside
on Jul 22, 2011 at 9:15 am

kyle-you've highlighted the double standard prevalent in most 'progressive' or liberal political causes. It seems to be an arrogance that they are so right and justified in their cause that the rules don't apply to them. As you've no doubt surmised, the hypocritcal 'do as I say, not as I do' attitude, is their mantra. If you question them, then you're considered 'intolerant'. Well, so be it....you can't have it both ways.


Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore
on Jul 22, 2011 at 9:32 am

I agree that it's wrong to mess up another person's space. What would be funny is to view a video of the prankster cleaning up their mess under police supervision!

Something has got to be done about this bad behavior. Like go out and have a gelato today!


Posted by Julie, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jul 22, 2011 at 4:16 pm

Julie is a registered user.

First, no, "glittering an office" does not represent the "same violent acts that gay individuals are against". While I disagree with "glittering" a person or an office, I do not view it in the same vein as the truly violent acts that have been aimed at gays. I'm not even sure I consider it "violent" period. It's more like "inappropriate" or "annoying". Maybe if the glitter gets in your eye it would sting.

Second, Steve...really? You think hypocrisy is limited to "progressives" and/or "liberals"? You think only those groups think "that the rules don't apply to them"? Obviously you only hear what you want to, because there are MANY examples of hypocrisy throughout the entire political spectrum.

Third, While I don't condone the glittering. I repeat, I DON'T CONDONE IT.... can you not see why gays would be SO angry? I read that Bachmann considers gays as being "barbaric", or as having some sort of "illness" that can be "prayed" away. I can't even imagine how that must feel to a gay person. Thank goodness those types of comments weren't directed at a group that would respond in a *truly* violent manner.


Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore
on Jul 22, 2011 at 6:49 pm

Marcus Bachmann v. Rue Paul to the finish!


Posted by Sunshine, a resident of Happy Valley
on Jul 23, 2011 at 6:28 am

We need to work on banning rice-throwing at weddings. Rice-throwing is just like all other ugly, violent acts that are carried out by leftist unionists.

As far as violence directed at gays, that's a union fantasy. We live in a nation where everyone is treated equally. This has been so ever since Martin Luthern King bonded with the corrupt unions to boycott all-American stores.

In Norway they've banned glittering.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

PG&E: How does the piper pay?
By Tom Cushing | 11 comments | 744 views

Getting rid of an old toilet
By Roz Rogoff | 13 comments | 666 views

More changes coming to ValleyCare
By Tim Hunt | 17 comments | 653 views

Take Full Advantage of Free Standardized Testing Opportunities
By Elizabeth LaScala | 0 comments | 560 views