Town Square

Post a New Topic

State's May Revise Gives more Money to Schools

Original post made by parent, Another Pleasanton neighborhood, on May 16, 2011

The May Review from Brown came out today.

State income is up which means that schools will receive more next year based on their assumptions.

Because of California's Proposition 98 guarantee, the state would owe K-12 schools and community colleges about half of those revenues. Brown's plan envisions schools getting about $3 billion more next year than it is getting this year.

This will now show how well the school board works. If the income for next year is more than this year, and they still eliminate programs and fire teachers, you know they are doing something wrong.

Comments (19)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by optimistic mom
a resident of Amador Valley High School
on May 16, 2011 at 1:54 pm

The May Revision is of the governor's proposed budget proposal. It has not yet been enacted into law. It includes a key assumption that the legislature will approve of extending the sales and vehicle tax rates at their current level (which would require a 2/3rds vote in favor of doing so.)

Until the budget is enacted, we do not know that schools will receive more revenue. It is possible that they may receive more revenue than Pleasanton's school board has been planning for (which I think is good, because it means that the school board is budgeting conservatively). It is also possible that the state legislature might still vote to suspend Proposition 98 (which I think they did last year), in which case, additional income tax revenue will not flow through to school funding.

The May Revise is not the end of the story. It's only act 2, and there are at least 3 acts in this play.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by optimistic mom
a resident of Amador Valley High School
on May 16, 2011 at 2:32 pm

Here's a good story in the OC Register that provides some context:

Web Link

And here's a collection of links to the actual proposal:

Web Link


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Start Afresh
a resident of Country Fair
on May 16, 2011 at 3:55 pm

Gov. Brown punted. He doesn't have the courage to publish an all-cuts budget to let the voters know what his priorities are if he doesn't get the tax extensions/increases he wants. That.....is not leadership. It is cowardly politics. And makes the 1000 school districts put budgets in place that are based on the hope that taxes are extended. What a waste of time he has caused.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by parent
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 16, 2011 at 4:23 pm

Yes the May Revise is just the next step and there are more. The good news is that the district was concerned that the May Revise was going to result in less money. That turns out not to be the case.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Smart 'n Fresh
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 16, 2011 at 4:52 pm

I, for one, am outraged. Like Start Afresh, my mentor, I am appalled that the governor wants to pour billions of dollars into the educational system. And who do we have to thank for this recklessness? The UNIONS!!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger
a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on May 16, 2011 at 5:04 pm

Clearly you missed the point Start was making Smart. Districts in CA will, as usual, have to produce final budgets by June 30 before the state legislature will have adopted their budget. Most districts will be forced to be conservative. That would mean teacher layoffs, cuts to program, increased class sizes, and all that will hurt not only the unions, but more importantly, students.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Smart 'n Fresh
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 16, 2011 at 5:10 pm

I think YOU missed the point. We need to break up the teacher's unions!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by optimistic mom
a resident of Amador Valley High School
on May 16, 2011 at 6:00 pm

I know that recent history suggests it's unlikely, but it is possible that we could pass a state budget before June 30. There's a whole month before June 15, which should be the legislature's deadline (since none of them will get paid after that until they get the budget done.)

The Republican plan calls for a 10% pay cut for all state employees. Perhaps the governor could agree to drop the request for extending the sales tax in exchange for a Republican agreement to settle for a 5% pay cut? Perhaps Republicans could settle for a slightly higher spending cap, if the governor will agree to put one in place?

There's still room for compromise before act 3.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jack
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 16, 2011 at 9:37 pm

"Gov. Brown punted. He doesn't have the courage to publish an all-cuts budget"

Why would he do that? He thinks we need higher taxes and I agree with him. I'm not sure


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jack
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 16, 2011 at 9:38 pm

"have to produce final budgets by June 30 before the state legislature will have adopted their budget. Most districts will be forced to be conservative"

I think he was saying the opposite of that, or maybe I'm missing the point.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Elitist
a resident of Birdland
on May 16, 2011 at 10:19 pm

Way to go Jerry! Not even a year in office and the deficit is reduced from 15 to 10 billion. Not bad fella! And to think so many of the yokels on these sites supported that walking catastrophe, meg whitman.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by jokers
a resident of Foothill Knolls
on May 17, 2011 at 10:44 am

still not too late for all of you bleeding hearts to donate to the schools because Measure E failed (again). Put your money where your mouth is instead of putting my money where your mouth is.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Brian
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 17, 2011 at 11:04 am

I tell you what Joker. Let's make a deal. I'll pay your portion of any parcel tax Pleasanton may enact if you let me keep the difference between the average increase/decrease in house values in the bay area and the average increase/decrease in Pleasanton house values between now and when you sell your house.

For example, say you want to sell your house 4 years from now. If bay area houses values decline 10% in the next 4 years, but Pleasanton only declines 5%, you'll owe me 5% of your house value when you sell. That's fair isn't it? After all, your house value would have dropped 10% if it wasn't for the schools that I'll be paying to maintain.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Nomad
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 17, 2011 at 11:05 am

I suggest everyone read the School Services of California (SSC) analysis of the governor's May budget revise. (Web Link)
This is a consulting/lobbying company that PUSD pays and where several PUSD leaders go to get advice on how to budget (note reference to upcoming 5/19 conference).
Contrary to the original poster's belief that schools will be getting increased spending capacity of $3B, SSC says:
"However, this rise in Proposition 98 will not translate into additional expenditures at the local level. Instead, the Governor proposes to use the increase to (1) reverse $2.5 billion in K-12 apportionment deferrals, (2) reverse $350 million in community college apportionment deferrals, and (3) provide $222 million to fund mental health and out-of-home care for special education students, an expense that was previously borne by counties. With these proposed expenditures, state expenditures under Proposition 98 will increase compared to the January Budget proposal, but school districts will not experience a net increase in expenditure authority. Therefore, overall expenditures for schools will be roughly flat under the May Revision, rather than what was initially perceived to be a significant boost."
If enacted, funding for AB 3632 may save PUSD $1M in the 11-12 budget and there may be lower borrowing costs. Again, this is all contingent on whether the tax extensions happen.
There are only two more scheduled school board meetings before PUSD needs to put their 11-12 budget into place. I encourage everyone to attend or watch.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by new mom
a resident of Foothill High School
on May 17, 2011 at 11:43 am

Hi Joker.... I DID send in my money. I just sent $100 to the CORE campaign. Will you do the same? Or do you not value education?
Anyone who is using this to 'break unions; or whatever else you agenda is...is using our children as pawns. And that is SOOOOOO sad


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Start Afresh
a resident of Country Fair
on May 17, 2011 at 12:53 pm

Silicon Valley Education Foundation contributes this analysis (Web Link)
"Though pressed by reporters, Brown and his finance director, Ana Matosantos, were vague ... in explaining how districts should go about building next year's budgets now without knowing for sure there will be more revenue."
The hope is people begin to see the state's 'gimmick' of deferrals and Prop 98 maintenance factors are hurting the schools. PUSD and the union's inflate the budget drama by keeping the 3-year contracts in place and using one-year agreements as band-aids while the underlying structural deficits persist. All the while, the kids are hurt and school employees from the top to the bottom protect their salaries.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Stacey
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on May 17, 2011 at 1:24 pm

Stacey is a registered user.

That's good that they will start paying the deferrals. The State started the deferrals back after the dotcom bust, found it was a convenient, though irresponsible, way to balance the budget, and has been doing it ever since. In the meantime, districts have been forced to borrow, which meant taxpayer money being paid for debt service rather than to the classrooms.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Joe
a resident of Ruby Hill
on May 17, 2011 at 1:42 pm

If you want some intelligent analysis of CA's problems, go look at The Economist and their Special Report on California, how it got to this point and what it will take to get out. Expectations that these problems are going to be solved with a wave of the magic wand are unrealistic, ie. criticism that they were "vague" in their guidance. My recollection was we had a similar situation in early 2010, revenues came in higher than expected and then came in lower than expected. For all of the anti-union contributors, please go start your own blog and grind your ax there. CORE -yes, putting money where my mouth is, and am happily paying extra...


 +   Like this comment
Posted by concerned parent
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 17, 2011 at 2:32 pm

Thank you, Joe.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Where's the wind?
By Roz Rogoff | 2 comments | 692 views