Town Square

Post a New Topic

GOP's Harmer issues concessionary statement in loss to McNerney in 11th Congressional District race

Original post made on Dec 6, 2010

San Ramon attorney and Republican David Harmer has conceded defeat in his bid to unseat Congressman Jerry McNerney (D-Pleasanton) as the 11th Congressional District representative.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, December 6, 2010, 8:58 AM

Comments (16)

Posted by Next Time, a resident of Pheasant Ridge
on Dec 6, 2010 at 3:38 pm

You came close David. But it is only a little ironic that this is published by the PW who not only endorsed your opponent, but activlly campained against you by pulling down any blog thread with neagtive comments about Pelosi's lap dog McNerney. The liberals who publish the PW will probably pull this down before you see it. But if you check back of wishes to you and your family and good luck in your future endeavors.

Posted by b, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Dec 6, 2010 at 3:46 pm

Maybe he'll take down his campaign signs now. I sure hope he's not planning to leave those all over town until the 2012 election.

Posted by Jane Hull, a resident of Livermore
on Dec 6, 2010 at 7:07 pm

In that forthcoming "more detailed report" that is being promised, I'd like to hear how Harmer got by receiving unemployment benefits for all those weeks without looking seriously for a job other than politician. Kind of smells like arriving at the welfare office in a Cadillac to me. But, no matter, his supporters were okay with him being an unemployed carpetbagger, and they got all that they deserved.

Posted by Arroyo, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Dec 6, 2010 at 10:24 pm

Jane, the man only lost by 2,500 votes -- not exactly a resounding endorsement of Mr. McNerney's illustrious career(?) in Washington. But, keep on spewing the bile. Maybe they'll redraw the district and then he won't be a carpetbagger, plus maybe he'll find a job. What next? I suppose you want him to change his religion?

Posted by Jane Hull, a resident of Livermore
on Dec 6, 2010 at 10:49 pm

I'm not so sure, Arroyo, that he wouldn't change his religion if he thought it could maybe get him elected. Former credit card debt collector, two-faced stimulus critic who took stimulus money, unemployed deadbeat who collected unemployment benefits while spouting Republican line about the 'virtue' of not extending benefits to those in need, proponent of denying affordable health care to impoverished parents and their children. Called out dems for being 'arrogant' in wanting to spend ("his") money on govt'l programs, while he had no qualms about using unemployment compensation to supplement the bail-out bonus money he received. Please! This isn't a problem of his religion. It's a problem of being two-faced and his followers willing to forgive him for it. Dream all you might for redistricting, which I'm beginning to think is nothing more than tea party code for wishful gated communities that lock the you-know-who people outside the gates.

Posted by mickey marcuse, a resident of Dublin
on Dec 7, 2010 at 12:08 am

Really can't agree with the assessment of why he lost. Harmer's never was a 'winning campaign' as he attests. There was only the illusion of being a 'winning campaign' after a right-wing pollster fudged some numbers early on, thereby creating the false narrative that Harmer was ahead (and which the so-called liberal media uncritically accepted, without so much as a peep of healthy skepticism). So, too, the mularky about being outspent. If outspending one's opponent is to be a criterion for winning, as Harmer seems to be claiming, then Meg Whitman should have won by 6 million votes. No, the enthusiasm of the people was clearly behind McNerney, from start to finish. I was at the forum when the two (three, if you want to include the goofball) candidates debated. McNerney's supporters outnumbered Harmer's supporters by two to one. The impassioned voices from the sea of blue-clad college kids and young workers and people of color drowned out the desperately dying squawks coming from the island of red oldsters.

Posted by Arroyo, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Dec 7, 2010 at 6:10 am

McNerney is a nice person, but I believe is very lucky to have retained his job, regardless of how many supporters attended the Forum.

Now, please compare the tone of the comments above from Jane and Mickey. One is a dignified analysis, one is an undignified rant. You decide.

Posted by Arroyo, a resident of Pleasanton Valley
on Dec 7, 2010 at 7:04 am

Yes arroyo good call. Ecen in victory Jane is just another angry liberal. The amount of anger in liberals always amazes me.

Posted by Vincentia, a resident of Downtown
on Dec 7, 2010 at 9:05 am

I disagree with the Arroyos. Jan and mickey seem to be offering analysis, backed with passion, while the Arroyos offer no analysis at all. I'm also surprised no one has jumped to the defense of mormonism, giving its shining history of polygamy and treatment of children like sexual chattel until that darned intrusive regulatory state intervened. Or its current history of anti-gay zealotry, appealing to that darned intrusive regulatory state for protection against gay 'persecution' in the form of loving gay couples wanting to marry and be treated equally.

Posted by Marvin, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Dec 7, 2010 at 11:12 am

Vincentia, why don't mention how the religion seen blacks as stained by the devil.

Posted by Vincentia, a resident of Downtown
on Dec 7, 2010 at 1:22 pm

Marvin, I think Karl Malone changed that, though you'd never know it by looking at the BYU sports teams.

Posted by dublinmike, a resident of Dublin
on Dec 7, 2010 at 9:36 pm

Finally. What a waste of donations and tax dollars.

So, Jim01, you folks lose this round.

Posted by SteveP, a resident of Parkside
on Dec 8, 2010 at 8:55 am

SteveP is a registered user.

No, dublinmike, we all lose because we're stuck with the same old crap that isn't working now. This state is a mess and it's not because of the folks running in the elections that want to make changes---it's the incumbent Dems who maintain the status quo and refuse to run the state within it's means.

Posted by Patriot, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Dec 8, 2010 at 9:27 am

"This state is a mess ..."

Harmer wasn't running for state office. At the federal level, Democrats and Republicans got us into this mess. Harmer was just one more crony capitalist "Republican". No different from Obama or Bush.

Posted by dublinmike, a resident of Dublin
on Dec 9, 2010 at 10:36 pm

dublinmike is a registered user.

Next Time, SteveP, et al, grow up. Your person lost. Stop whining.

Regarding "it's the incumbent Dems" is such a hypocrisy on your part. Self-serving is more like it

Face it, all sides are dirty. The difference is that I recognize it, and you don't. What have you said about the self-serving Republicans? Probably not much. I challenge all sides, including Representative Jerry McNerney, to work for us.

Posted by Chet, a resident of San Ramon
on Dec 10, 2010 at 9:47 pm

The right man won this election for all the right reason. Jerry McNerney is a fine hard working congressman. Jerry is a terrific rep for all of us in Washington D.C.

If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Understanding Early Decision in College Admissions
By Elizabeth LaScala | 1 comment | 1,901 views

New heights for NIMBYs
By Tim Hunt | 29 comments | 1,227 views

When those covering the news become the news
By Gina Channell-Allen | 1 comment | 903 views

Earthquake Insurance
By Roz Rogoff | 2 comments | 733 views