GOP's Harmer issues concessionary statement in loss to McNerney in 11th Congressional District race State, National, International, posted by Editor, Pleasanton Weekly Online, on Dec 6, 2010 at 3:38 pm
San Ramon attorney and Republican David Harmer has conceded defeat in his bid to unseat Congressman Jerry McNerney (D-Pleasanton) as the 11th Congressional District representative.
Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, December 6, 2010, 8:58 AM
Posted by Next Time, a resident of the Pheasant Ridge neighborhood, on Dec 6, 2010 at 3:38 pm
You came close David. But it is only a little ironic that this is published by the PW who not only endorsed your opponent, but activlly campained against you by pulling down any blog thread with neagtive comments about Pelosi's lap dog McNerney. The liberals who publish the PW will probably pull this down before you see it. But if you check back first...best of wishes to you and your family and good luck in your future endeavors.
Posted by Jane Hull, a resident of Livermore, on Dec 6, 2010 at 7:07 pm
In that forthcoming "more detailed report" that is being promised, I'd like to hear how Harmer got by receiving unemployment benefits for all those weeks without looking seriously for a job other than politician. Kind of smells like arriving at the welfare office in a Cadillac to me. But, no matter, his supporters were okay with him being an unemployed carpetbagger, and they got all that they deserved.
Posted by Arroyo, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Dec 6, 2010 at 10:24 pm
Jane, the man only lost by 2,500 votes -- not exactly a resounding endorsement of Mr. McNerney's illustrious career(?) in Washington. But, keep on spewing the bile. Maybe they'll redraw the district and then he won't be a carpetbagger, plus maybe he'll find a job. What next? I suppose you want him to change his religion?
Posted by Jane Hull, a resident of Livermore, on Dec 6, 2010 at 10:49 pm
I'm not so sure, Arroyo, that he wouldn't change his religion if he thought it could maybe get him elected. Former credit card debt collector, two-faced stimulus critic who took stimulus money, unemployed deadbeat who collected unemployment benefits while spouting Republican line about the 'virtue' of not extending benefits to those in need, proponent of denying affordable health care to impoverished parents and their children. Called out dems for being 'arrogant' in wanting to spend ("his") money on govt'l programs, while he had no qualms about using unemployment compensation to supplement the bail-out bonus money he received. Please! This isn't a problem of his religion. It's a problem of being two-faced and his followers willing to forgive him for it. Dream all you might for redistricting, which I'm beginning to think is nothing more than tea party code for wishful gated communities that lock the you-know-who people outside the gates.
Posted by mickey marcuse, a resident of Dublin, on Dec 7, 2010 at 12:08 am
Really can't agree with the assessment of why he lost. Harmer's never was a 'winning campaign' as he attests. There was only the illusion of being a 'winning campaign' after a right-wing pollster fudged some numbers early on, thereby creating the false narrative that Harmer was ahead (and which the so-called liberal media uncritically accepted, without so much as a peep of healthy skepticism). So, too, the mularky about being outspent. If outspending one's opponent is to be a criterion for winning, as Harmer seems to be claiming, then Meg Whitman should have won by 6 million votes. No, the enthusiasm of the people was clearly behind McNerney, from start to finish. I was at the forum when the two (three, if you want to include the goofball) candidates debated. McNerney's supporters outnumbered Harmer's supporters by two to one. The impassioned voices from the sea of blue-clad college kids and young workers and people of color drowned out the desperately dying squawks coming from the island of red oldsters.
Posted by Vincentia, a resident of the Downtown neighborhood, on Dec 7, 2010 at 9:05 am
I disagree with the Arroyos. Jan and mickey seem to be offering analysis, backed with passion, while the Arroyos offer no analysis at all. I'm also surprised no one has jumped to the defense of mormonism, giving its shining history of polygamy and treatment of children like sexual chattel until that darned intrusive regulatory state intervened. Or its current history of anti-gay zealotry, appealing to that darned intrusive regulatory state for protection against gay 'persecution' in the form of loving gay couples wanting to marry and be treated equally.
Posted by SteveP, a resident of the Parkside neighborhood, on Dec 8, 2010 at 8:55 am SteveP is a member (registered user) of PleasantonWeekly.com
No, dublinmike, we all lose because we're stuck with the same old crap that isn't working now. This state is a mess and it's not because of the folks running in the elections that want to make changes---it's the incumbent Dems who maintain the status quo and refuse to run the state within it's means.
Posted by dublinmike, a resident of Dublin, on Dec 9, 2010 at 10:36 pm dublinmike is a member (registered user) of PleasantonWeekly.com
Next Time, SteveP, et al, grow up. Your person lost. Stop whining.
Regarding "it's the incumbent Dems" is such a hypocrisy on your part. Self-serving is more like it
Face it, all sides are dirty. The difference is that I recognize it, and you don't. What have you said about the self-serving Republicans? Probably not much. I challenge all sides, including Representative Jerry McNerney, to work for us.