Town Square

Post a New Topic

Joan Laursen's sticker

Original post made by Cathy S., Laguna Oaks, on Oct 24, 2010

One thing I will give to Joan Laursen, she has a very WELL funded campaign. Did anyone notice Joan Laursen's sticker on the front of the Weekly? I hear that costs about $1500. She has ads and signs everywhere. Where is she getting so much money for to run her school board campaign? I hope it is not from promises made to the teacher's union.

Comments (22)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Devon
a resident of Apperson Ridge
on Oct 24, 2010 at 3:25 pm

Perhaps she's just good at raising funds. If I remember correctly, she spearheaded the "Save Pleasanton Schools" fund raising and raised quite a significant amount of donation for the school to put Measure G on the ballot. She is a strong supporter of the PUSD administration, so much so it worries me.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Anonymous
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Oct 24, 2010 at 5:24 pm

I don't think it's because of any promises made. In fact, Joan Laursen has been very consistent in her public statements at candidate forums, saying she will not make any "piecrust promises", those that are easily made and easily broken. She's a strong advocate for education, but also an independent thinker.

If you're really concerned about a candidate's source of funding, you can do the research. Candidates file fundraising reports with the Secretary of State's office in Sacramento, and they are a matter of public record. There are two links where you can look:

Web Link

(City of Pleasanton Portal)

Web Link

(Alameda County Registrar of Voters)

Or just call Alameda County's office -- (510) 272-6973.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Dark Corners of Town
a resident of Country Fair
on Oct 24, 2010 at 7:41 pm

Interesting that the Pleasanton Chamber's BACPAC report dated 10/5/2010 shows both Jeff Bowser and Darryl Laursen contributed to the Chamber's political action committee. (Web Link)

Is it a coincidence that Bowser and Laursen received the Chamber's BACPAC endorsement for School Board?

It would be more interesting to see if either of them had contributed to the Chamber's BACPAC prior to this.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Patriot
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Oct 24, 2010 at 9:33 pm

That link doesn't work.

Who is Darryl Laursen?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Dark Corners of Town
a resident of Country Fair
on Oct 24, 2010 at 9:45 pm

Use this link (Web Link) and put in the date range for 7/1/10 to today.

Darryl is Joan's spouse.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Another Parent
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Oct 25, 2010 at 9:03 am

Anyone who has been as actively involved with PTA as long as Ms. Laursen has knows a thing or two about fundraising. She also has an experienced campaign manager.
Ms. Laursen and Mr. Bowser may have more funds available to publicizie their candidates because they have accepted endorements and donations from specific groups. That was their choice and I don't think that should be held against them.
On the other hand, I admire Ms. Piderit's decision to not accept contributions or endorsements from any specific group. It means she has less funds to publicize her campaign, but she's also able to avoid any comments such as those stated above.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by annonymous
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Oct 25, 2010 at 12:06 pm

Often the reason a candidate has not accepted money from specific groups is because NONE has been offered. If the candidate attended the endorsement interviews and they were endorsed a small contribution usually followed. It has become common for candidates to claim they would not accept the money which is an lie of omission if they actually attended the interview. I don't know any candidate that has been offered a small contribution after an endorsement and refused it.

Influenced is not bought by $150 and $250 checks. Many of these groups are not necessarily on the same page so what they are contributing to are those people who they think actually will research the issue.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Luana
a resident of Harvest Park Middle School
on Oct 25, 2010 at 1:04 pm

I agree with "Resident". Sandy Piderit and Joan Laursen are what our community needs now. We need people we can trust to spend money on our children's education and who can think creatively and freely. While Laursen did accept money for her campaign from the teachers' union, she doesn't have a family member who is a union rep and teacher like Jeff Bowser. What is worse, California state law allows Jeff to vote on teachers' contracts even though his own wife is a teacher. He can also vote on other union-related issues that may/will come up. With his wife a union-rep and the resounding endorsement from the President of the local teachers' union, Trevor Nagy (see Nagy's letter to the editor in the Weekly last Friday), I think Jeff will find it difficult to vote any other way than pro-union! Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that we want someone who votes against the union every time. I'm saying we want school board members who can make decisions which are truly best for our students and not necessarily best for the teachers' union. As we've seen over the last few years, what is best for the students is NOT always best for the teachers' union.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Informed Voter
a resident of Pleasanton Meadows
on Oct 25, 2010 at 3:03 pm

So what if Jeff has union ties. He'll be able to negotiate better on behalf of the school district.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Anonymous
a resident of Birdland
on Oct 25, 2010 at 7:54 pm

LOL @ UN-"Informed Voter". And there are unicorns living among us.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by George
a resident of California Reflections
on Oct 26, 2010 at 10:22 am

I noticed Sandy Thorne also donated to the PAC. Isn't she Jerry's wife?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Elizabeth
a resident of Mohr Park
on Oct 26, 2010 at 11:34 am

@ annonymous

While that might be true for some politicians - Ms. Piderit, who is not a politician, specifically decided not to send in letters or attend interviews seeking endorsements. As her neighbor and now her friend, I know she can be trusted.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sandy Piderit
a resident of Mohr Park
on Oct 26, 2010 at 12:39 pm

thanks, Elizabeth!

To make sure my approach is described clearly and consistently -- I did accept invitations to interview with APT and CSEA, as well as with the Pleasanton Weekly and the Bay Area News Group (which publishes the Tri-Valley Herald and the Valley Times, among other papers. I submitted a written questionnaire to the Chamber, at their request, but did not receive an invitation to an interview.

Here's how I answered the question on the APT/CSEA questionnaire:

"14. Why are you seeking an endorsement from our association?

I accepted an invitation to meet with you because I believe that communication is valuable, and sometimes there's no substitute for being in a room together, face-to-face. I want to learn more about what you believe is important for our students.

I am not seeking, nor will I accept, donations from political action committees or political parties. I welcome support from individuals (including members of your organization) – especially offers to volunteer and to reach out to other community members."

This is the approach I described at my first campaign kickoff in August, and I have been consistent throughout.

FYI, I have not received any donations of more than $100 from any individual. My husband and I paid the fee to have a campaign statement published in the voter guide that is sent to registered voters ($1119) and we paid almost that much again into the campaign account.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Devon
a resident of Apperson Ridge
on Oct 26, 2010 at 6:31 pm

Ms. Piderit, you are clearly the breathe of fresh air we need in the board. You have my vote. I only wish there was another candidate not tied to the union. Thank you for tossing your hat in the ring.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Kathy
a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on Oct 26, 2010 at 9:50 pm

Sandy;

Both my husband and I voted for you too. Just one vote each - for you. Thank you for not being a sell out to the PAC groups.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Wondering
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Oct 26, 2010 at 10:18 pm

I would like to know how Sandy will be voting against the union, the teachers as so many are grateful for here? Sounds like a bias to me. How do you react to this Sandy? I would think a board member should be willing and able to work with all staff. What is it that this community feels Sandy will do that other candidates won't do? This us vs. them is certainly not the type of productive working situation that will help our schools, yet we are to vote for that? And Sandy is expected to follow this?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sandy Piderit
a resident of Mohr Park
on Oct 27, 2010 at 7:27 am

I deeply appreciate the work that teachers, staff, and managers do within PUSD. I am certainly willing to work alongside them in continuing to improve the educational experience for all students who attend Pleasanton's schools. The district cannot accomplish its mission without the skills and dedication that staff bring to their work each day.

I do not think of myself as pro-union or anti-union, but simply as an independent thinker. I recognize that the primary reason that unions were founded, historically, was to address the working conditions of employees and ensure that they are treated fairly. That is an understandable desire of a group of employees, and I do not have any agenda to undermine the union.

What I am committed to doing, if I am elected, is representing all the residents of Pleasanton, listening to their points of view, and using my best judgment to approach board decisions with the interests of our community's children foremost in my mind.

To get back to the original topic of this thread -- Joan Laursen chose a different campaign strategy than I did, in setting a different goal around fundraising. I don't think that tells the voters much about her commitment to put the interests of our community's children first. She's clearly committed to that. I believe that all three of the candidates share a desire to do what's best for children.

Voters consider many different issues when making their decisions. I hope that people who vote for me do so because of the particular strengths I can bring to the board.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by John
a resident of Danbury Park
on Oct 27, 2010 at 12:35 pm

Sandy is a teacher--although at the college level. She will have some understanding of the challenges faced in the classroom as well as empathy for the profession. She certainly isn't anti-teacher or union. What the above blogs are talking about is the conflict of interest presented when one's wife is a union rep and how that might bias Jeff Bowser's votes if elected to the board. Sandy comes from a more unbiased perspective and, I think, can represent her constituents better.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Wondering
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Oct 27, 2010 at 6:26 pm

Hintzke's brother worked at Amador, Kernon's daughters worked at the elementary level. To slander Mr. Bowser's ability to work on the board due to his wife's career is ridiculous. I am looking for a board member who understands a teacher's job, the role of administrators, how school financing works. Mr. Bowser has impressive qualifications:

"He knows how education works. He has a master's degree in Educational Leadership with a credential as a professional educator. He worked for 13 years as a teacher and an administrator at the school, district and county levels.

"However, he combines this experience with his expertise in business and management in the private sector, which gives him a unique perspective on education in our district."


I know Sandy and Joan have great qualifications as well. We are fortunate to have three candidates who are willing to give back to Pleasanton. But to discredit someone because the teacher's union has endorsed them or they are related to an educator is disingenuous. Hintzke was endorsed by the teacher's union, elected and practices "free thinking".

I am looking for a candidate who is NOT pursuing this us vs. them attitude that is common place here. I would hope for a candidate who is able to understand the needs of the community as well as the schools- not this faux angst towards our local union and teachers.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Stacey
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on Oct 27, 2010 at 7:50 pm

Stacey is a registered user.

Hintzke was NOT endorsed by the teacher's union. Web Link and Web Link

Also:
"Posted by Just the facts, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Mar 24, 2010 at 9:54 am

In the last school board election, only candidates Grant, Bowser and Arkin had APT endorsement.

Candidates Hintke and Grant were the only two candidates endorsed by school board members Ott and Kernan.

Candidate Arkin was the only candidate endorsed by school board member Kris Weaver.

Candidates Grant, Hintzke and Bowser were endorsed by the Pleasanton Weekly.

The www.smartvoter.org website provides more detailed information regarding the last school board election and its candidates."


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Wondering
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Oct 27, 2010 at 10:00 pm

Sorry, my mistake- even more telling though since Arkin is so often thought of as the independent thinker of the group.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Suzanne
a resident of Del Prado
on Oct 27, 2010 at 10:07 pm

Have you "goolged" Sandy Piderit? She has published two books. Organizational development and management.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

A fitting tribute to Ken Mercer
By Tim Hunt | 2 comments | 949 views

Lulu is back home!!!!
By Roz Rogoff | 7 comments | 786 views