Posted by dogfish, a resident of the Highland Oaks neighborhood, on Oct 8, 2010 at 8:47 am
Why would you recommend a 6 year incumbent. Hosterman never was any good with her ideas and I feel Pleasanton will be better off with a new mayor and new ideas to continue to improve one of the best places to live.
Posted by Fact Checker, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Oct 8, 2010 at 9:09 am
Good job weekly! You endorsed people with vision and who are more than one issue candidates. Yes, the three council incumbents were endorsed by the Chamber of Commerce but to some degree all were also endorsed by labor and the firefghters. I think that demonstrates what the weekly said about Cook-Kallio could be applied to Thorne and Hosterman also, they represent the diverse stakeholders that make up Pleasanton. The current council has done a great job. Pleasanton is a wonderful city and we need people in office who see the big picture not one issue candidates.
Vote Hosterman Cook-Kallio, and Thorne for Pleasanton City Council
Posted by Salsa, a resident of the Downtown neighborhood, on Oct 8, 2010 at 10:00 am
The Pleasanton Weekly is right on target as to why it is endorsing these candidates. We don't need to go experimenting with unknown candidates at this time. We need people with a wide range of experience who have convictions, a sense of fairness and are able to lead our city into the future.
Posted by Tonya "Clubber" Harding, a resident of the Downtown neighborhood, on Oct 8, 2010 at 10:17 am
Hurray! If Hosterman gets another term, Pleasanton is sure to get an ice arena! If she can't put one in downtown, she'll put one in the Staples Ranch property. If she can't get one built there, she'll get the Lin's to build it and donate it to the city in return for more housing. She might not do anything else for the next couple of years, but by God Pleasanton is going to have an ice rink!
Posted by Chamber Stooges, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Oct 8, 2010 at 10:49 am
No surprise here. The Chamber Mouthpiece endorsing the Chamber Stooges. Let's just hope the voters see this for what it is: an incestuous orgy of corruption designed to benefit the narrowest of special interests and gut what we have left of local democracy.
Posted by 40 year resident, a resident of the Pleasanton Heights neighborhood, on Oct 8, 2010 at 10:57 am
Congradulations Pleasanton Weekly. You are supporting the team that best represents the majority of the residents. Cindy and Karla are just rubber stamps for Kay Ayala and have cost Peasanton dearly with legal fees and the opportunity for a 500 acre park and trails and preservation of the ridge. Also denying the owners of the property their rights to develope their land.
Posted by Roberto G., a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Oct 8, 2010 at 10:59 am
OMG! This is a stunner! NOT!!!!
Did anybody expect the Weekly to endorse anyone other than these three? The only question is rather they did it as a locked-step left-wing loon endorsement, or rather they were following instructions of the big kahuna, Scott Raty, CEO of the Pleasanton Chamber of Commerce. Keeping these three in office automatically lets Raty control a majority of the council.
Come on Pleasanton, we can no longer put up with the Hippie Mayor and her two side-kicks. They are at the beck and call of the Chamber and the developers and they have been very harmful to Pleasanton. ITS TIME TO GIVE THEM THE BOOT!
Jeb, if you already haven't you can also go ahead and endorse Jerry Brown, Barbara Boxer and Jerry McNerny - the Loon Trifecta!
Posted by Barry, a resident of the Stoneridge neighborhood, on Oct 8, 2010 at 2:05 pm
I want an investigation into the Chamber of Commerce. I read where the National Chamber of Commerce is taking millions of $$$$$ from FOREIGN interests and co-mingling it with US funds and spending to influence the continuation of shipping our jobs overseas!
How connected is our local CoC to the national?
Why are local employment figures not discussed? Why are the RISING business vacancies not being addressed?
Hosterman just says that we just have to ride this out and see what happen!
I think we need new blood in our local government. We need another Measure "D" upset this November to combat this creeping CofC power that is being fueled by the US Supreme Court corrupt decision to give corporations a free for all channel for millions and millions of $$$$ to subvert, pervert, and influence our lcal lives.
NO on D! NO on Hosterman, Cook-Kalio, and Thorne!!
Like Measure D, the ONLY power We The People have is our vote. Let's do it again this November!
Those who are unsure of the CofC, please research our National CofC's efforts to help China and India keep stealing our jobs! They are funnels for a crap load of funny money from overseas!
Posted by GX, a member of the Foothill High School community, on Oct 8, 2010 at 4:20 pm
Good thing I'm an independent thinker and don't rely on biased publications like Pleasanton Weekly to make up my mind.
Of course the Pleasanton Weekly, Business Chamber of Commerce the Pleasanton City administration will always fight for candidates that will enable their development gravy train. Average citizen's needs and desires be damned.
Posted by Arroyo, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Oct 8, 2010 at 7:22 pm
GX -- Development is not a bad word. Ken Mercer, our last great mayor, understood planned progress and the benefits available for the citizens of Pleasanton. Too bad that we don't have another Ken Mercer on the horizon.
Okay, now, all you anti-ice rink, Oak Grove, and Stoneridge extension people, join hands and sing a couple of verses of Kumbaya just to get your political juices flowing....!
Posted by Eddie, a resident of the Birdland neighborhood, on Oct 8, 2010 at 11:07 pm
Already cast my mail-in vote. Those three DID NOT get my vote. No surprise that this liberal mag recommends them though. But if you are not informed and vote strictly by what the liberal newspapers and mags recommend, then you get what you deserve; tax and spend, comments of 'it's someones else's fault' and complete stupidity and ignorance.
Posted by Really., a resident of the Downtown neighborhood, on Oct 11, 2010 at 10:21 am
I do have to crack up at all of the comments regarding developer gravy train etc..... Guess how many building permits were pulled for an entire year last year? 41..... yes 41.......
To imply that any candidate is under the influence of development interest is absurd at this point, and frankly an old and tired and inaccurate argument.
For all those running on a "slow growth" agenda. Do you really think we can get slower than 41?
We are lucky to still be in a position to have a balanced budget with adequate city resources given the current economic crisis.
Time to get realistic no growth Pleasantonian's. With development at a stand still developer fees are GONE. How will we pay the bills for all of our expected services without revenue? The Chamber sees the writing on the wall and wants candidates that will bring business (tax revenue), to town to maintain our quality of life.
Clorox relocating to the Washington Mutual property is a big step in the right direction! Thanks for leading the effort to make this deal and others like it happen Mayor Hosterman. You have had and will always have the best interests of Pleasanton in your heart!!
If people want to consider good business a "special interest" I guess I'm for special interest.
Posted by Nomad, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Oct 11, 2010 at 10:48 am
Regarding Councilwoman Cheryl Cook-Kallio, Jeb Bing writes "While she doesn't wear any party affiliation on her sleeve, ..."
This is blatantly false - as Jeb Bing (PW 11.27.09) stated that Cheryl was the campaign coordinator for Alberto Torrico's run for Attorney General. A google search shows multiple cross-endorsements with Democrat candidates for office.
Posted by Nomad, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Oct 11, 2010 at 10:53 am
As Really. says, developer fee revenue is minimal. This has forced PUSD to *again* borrow from the Sycamore fund to cover the COP payments. I agree, if good business is a 'special interest', I'm all for it.
Posted by Mark, a member of the Walnut Grove Elementary School community, on Oct 15, 2010 at 9:23 pm
Who is Karla Brown and what has she done? She has no track record and her own real estate peers do not endorse her. She's had her head filled with Kay Ayla's nonsense. She needs to go back to her little fiefdom in Kottinger Ranch and try to figure out another way for the Lin's to not build on their property.
McGovern? Please! Another Ayala puppet. She can't hold a candle to anything Hosterman has accomplished during her tenure as mayor. McGovern opposes anything Hosterman favors. She has been an impediment to growth in this city. Send her off into the sunset!
Posted by Karla & Cindy Fan, a resident of the Bonde Ranch neighborhood, on Oct 17, 2010 at 10:01 am
What have Karla & Cindy done for us you ask? They represent the voters of Pleasanton - a welcome change! Jerry, Cheryl and Jennifer have been the talk peices for the Chamber for too long now. Cut off ridges, push through roads, put houses on ridges. That is what the chamber wants. Very suspicious how the incumbent's goals align with the Chamber's own 2015 plan to build this city which includes forcing Oak Grove and Staples ranch through before the process has been finished.