Soccer Mom Preditor Around Town, posted by Discusted, a resident of the Downtown neighborhood, on Aug 10, 2010 at 7:19 am
(08-09) 18:46 PDT LIVERMORE -- The 42-year-old Livermore mother accused of sexually assaulting two teenage boys first made an advance at one of them when he was 14 and was dating her daughter of the same age, authorities said.
After the incident in December 2008, authorities said, Christine Hubbs sent sexual text messages to the boy and gave him cash, expensive gifts and cellular telephones to maintain contact with her.
The allegations, contained in a police affidavit, were revealed Monday as Hubbs appeared in an Alameda County courtroom in Pleasanton to face charges that have stunned her suburban city.
The mother of three was arraigned on 67 felony counts, including unlawful sex with a minor and exhibition of lewd material to a minor.
Wearing a jail-issue jumpsuit, she flashed a quick smile at her husband - who waved at her from the second row - but cried as the hearing wore on and a judge ordered her bail set at $4.3 million. She did not enter a plea.
About a dozen friends showed up to support Hubbs and her husband of 20 years, Tim Hubbs, a well-known dentist who attended high school in the area.
Christine Hubbs' attorney, Jules Bonjour, asked that the media respect the family's privacy. A friend of six years, Robyn Azevedo of Oakley, said a tight group of friends was surrounding the family.
"This goes against everything we know about Christine and Tim," Azevedo said. "Tim asked us to support him and the family and we're giving it to him."
The jammed courtroom, though, took on a tabloid atmosphere as producers from TV newsmagazine shows passed out business cards. One family friend snapped "Vultures!" at the six camera crews.
Others who know Christine Hubbs said they were in shock.
"You could push me over with a feather right now," said Janice Grant, a Livermore resident who said her children played soccer on the same team as one of the Hubbses' daughters.
Grant described her friend of three years as the ultimate team mom, shuttling her kids to various sporting events and volunteering to make a shopping trip or host a team barbecue.
"I don't know how she could have had any time for this," Grant said.
Hubbs, who was arrested Thursday at her Livermore home, took one alleged victim to a local motel for intercourse, police said. They said she had sex with the second boy, who was 14, at least 15 times in the past eight months.
Police said Hubbs drove the boys around town in her black Hummer H2 - which had a personalized plate reading, "HUMDNGA" - sometimes engaging in sex acts in the vehicle.
Police said they learned of the crimes on July 27, when a mother of one of the alleged victims reported finding a nude photo of Hubbs on his phone.
In a separate misdemeanor charge, authorities allege that Hubbs recently bought pellet and water guns for several boys ages 9 to 14, then drove the boys around Livermore residential neighborhoods - at speeds up to 80 mph - as they fired at bystanders from the windows.
Posted by Sara, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Aug 10, 2010 at 9:32 am
In case you did not see my main post on this topic, I am reposting it here.
McNerney voted "YES" to protect pedophiles like our alleged pedophile "Hummer Mom" (H.R. 1913)
Doubt me? Here is info about this bill which passed. Tho it is called a "Hate Crimes" bill (Democrats are always deceptive in naming their bills), it specifically protects pedophiles...like our alleged pedophile Livermore "Hummer Mom."
The bill was introduced on April 28 in the U.S. Senate as S. 909. Violating equal justice under the law, the bill adds "sexual orientation" to a list of extra-protected groups under federal law.
Seem ok thus far? Well read on...
Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, offered this very simple amendment to H.R. 1913 in the House Judiciary Committee:
"The term sexual orientation as used in this act or any amendments to this act does not include pedophilia."
It was rejected by Congressional Democrats.
Info about the Pedophile Protection Act >>> Web Link
To summarize, pushing away an unwelcome advance of a homosexual, transgendered, cross-dresser or exhibitionist could make you a felon under this law. Speaking out against the homosexual agenda could also make you a felon if you are said to influence someone who pushes away that unwelcome advance. And pedophiles and other sexual deviant would enjoy an elevated level of protection, while children, seniors, veterans and churches would not.
McNerney...a typical democrat protecting the criminals over the victims.
Posted by what's up Gina?, a resident of the Downtown neighborhood, on Aug 10, 2010 at 9:55 am
Why did the Pleasanton Weakly (sic) lock comments on the original article? You allowed virtually limitless commenting on the tennis coash fiasco but when it's a "respected member" of the (allegedly) Mormon community you lock out comments. What's up with that?
Bigger question for me is with all of the evidence so far, and this is just the start, why is the husband protecting her? Protect your kids, yeah, but protect a wandering wife who gets it on with underage kids? Yes, I know, it has not been proved in court so I'll save my question to ask after the trial is over.
Check back here to see Gina lock this thread any minute.
Posted by colette, a resident of the Del Prado neighborhood, on Aug 10, 2010 at 11:05 am
I, too, was wondering why the Weekly locked out comments on the original article. Maybe because she is innocent till proven guilty? I don't know...with a nude photo of her on the boy's phone, seems like it will be a tough one to prove innocence! Pathetic! Good thing that mom was smart enough to check out the son's phone! We are living in a crazy world these days. Combine technology with sickos, and it is pretty dang scary.
Posted by lido, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Aug 10, 2010 at 11:15 am
Yes, the censorship amazed me ... in SF Gate the article states that people are protecting the family from intrusion and telling the media to respect the family. Now! This just doesn't seem logical or fair. This is a pedophile regardless. Yes she is Mormon and yes she is a woman, but protected from the media. She abused kids. What gives Pleasanton Weekly?
Posted by No Propoganda, a resident of the Canyon Meadows neighborhood, on Aug 10, 2010 at 12:56 pm
"I've written extensively about how this bill would criminalize Christianity and turn those who disagree with the homosexual agenda into felons, but criminalizing Christianity is just the beginning of what this bill would do."
Come now, please educate yourself and stop turning any subject into PROPAGANDA! What you posted simply is not true, however any "true Christian" will buy it hook, line and sinker cause this RAG said it was so!
Posted by June, a resident of Livermore, on Aug 10, 2010 at 10:53 pm
Lido, I can understand where you are concerned as stated in your comment about why should she be protected, however I believe that her minor children and husband, a.k.a. her family, that are not accused of the said crimes do deserve to be respected and not harassed by the media and community alike.
Posted by June, a resident of Livermore, on Aug 11, 2010 at 7:34 am
Cholo, I agree that the PW is not protecting the accused.
To make my original comment more clear, I was referring to an earlier posting that stated, "in SF Gate the article states that people are protecting the family from intrusion and telling the media to respect the family. Now! This just doesn't seem logical or fair."
Posted by Me, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Aug 11, 2010 at 7:50 am
What does her faith have to do with the fact she was abusing these boys? Her husbund should open his eyes and see what the heck she was doing. What about her children, the poor things, will be the subjects of all the fall out.
Posted by VC1461, a resident of Livermore, on Apr 24, 2011 at 11:47 am VC1461 is a member (registered user) of PleasantonWeekly.com
The whole thing is DISGUSTING!! She is a monster and I pity all children involved including their own. They have a child molester for a mother and a lunatic for a father! He is going to let the children around this registered sex offender, this child rapist?? The children should be taken away from the both and put in a safe environment. the families of the victims should sue the Hubbs for their house on Ruby Hill, the Hummer, and any other assets. She is a PEDATOR and changed the potential these boys had in life and this cannot be given back. She ruined the lives of her victims and her own children and is a disgusting human being. I will never return to Dr Hubbs office and truly pity all children involved. Hope she gets what's coming to her in Prison from the guards & other inmates!