Town Square

Post a New Topic

Harmer, happy with GOP lead for 11th Congressional District nomination, calls it a night

Original post made on Jun 9, 2010

Although Congressman Jerry McNerney (D-Pleasanton), facing no opposition for the Democrat Party nomination for election to a third term in office, left town at 7 a.m. yesterday to return to Washington, it was quite a different story for the Republican candidates vying for their party's nomination.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, June 9, 2010, 8:05 AM

Comments (31)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Dee
a resident of Del Prado
on Jun 9, 2010 at 8:52 am

Harmer took government bailout money when he got fired from his last job and he doesn't even live in the 11th District. Hypocrite and carpetbagger alert!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by jimf01
a resident of another community
on Jun 9, 2010 at 9:34 am

jimf01 is a registered user.

Well, I hope David Harmer could sleep, because I could not. The candidate best equipped to defeat McNerney and grab the gavel from Pelosi won!

Jerry McNerney will need to answer for 24% unemployment in CD-11, $13trill Obamacare, staunch support of cap & trade, the Democrats failure to act on illegal immigration, and voting with the Pelosi, Reid, Obama agenda better than 95% of the time.

Jerry McNerney couldn't even answer a Tea Party constituent question last week in Danville on his standing ovation for Mexican President Felipe Calderon
Link to MP3 --> Web Link


 +   Like this comment
Posted by jimf01
a resident of another community
on Jun 9, 2010 at 9:36 am

jimf01 is a registered user.

should have been $13trillion deficit, Obamacare


 +   Like this comment
Posted by SteveP
a resident of Parkside
on Jun 9, 2010 at 9:36 am

SteveP is a registered user.

Dee, you're a liar. You obviously did not read the article in the Times last Saturday debunking the same myths you're trying to propogate here. Nice try, loser. Go look up the article and quit the false propaganda.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Amy
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 9, 2010 at 9:51 am

Jim01, You are soooo correct. Thank you for your very good posts.

By the way, let me add a couple additional items that McNerney should answer for...

- Like a good socialist, he voted AGAINST the 1st Amendment of Free Speech ... when he voted against Mike Pence's petition to permanently dispose of the "(un)Fairness Doctrine" which would, in effect eliminate conservative talk radio.

- He also voted AGAINST a republican's amendment to the Obamacare bill which would have required Congress to have the same healthcare that they are proposing for ordinary Americans. So the Obamacare that McNerney forced upon us is not good enough for him!

He is a loathsome pathetic socialist.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Dee
a resident of Del Prado
on Jun 9, 2010 at 10:18 am

Nice to see all the usual Tea Party zealots (Jimf01, SteveP, and Amy) have shown up to comment here. You Tea Party people sure seem to have a lot of time on your hands! Good luck trying to defend Harmer, a smarmy career politician that hops from district to district looking to get elected. He is all for small government except when he uses government bailout money to fill his bank account. He is a true hypocrite, but since when did hypocrisy ever matter to you conservative ideologues.

Also, if any of you conservatives have trouble understanding big words, I'll write my next comment using those simple-minded, bumper sticker slogans that you people adore. Maybe I can use the word "socialist" over 50 times in my next post just to make Amy happy.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by dublinmike
a resident of Dublin
on Jun 9, 2010 at 11:03 am

dublinmike is a registered user.

Amy, you wouldn't know a socialist if they stood in front of you. McNerney a socialist? Yeah, right. Go study the history of western democracies and socialism as I have, and to get some accurate information lay off watching Beck for awhile.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by jimf01
a resident of another community
on Jun 9, 2010 at 11:38 am

jimf01 is a registered user.

The more appropriate term is progressive. The McNerney agenda is the progressive agenda is the Pelosi Reid Obama agenda. We've been over this, the evidence is the lawmakers own words, watch the videos.

Pleasanton Weekly - Town Square Topic: Web Link

Web Link

Cap & Trade, Obamacare, increase in entitlements, increase in federal employment, GM takeover, I could continue.

It is a path to socialism ala Western Europe, where we are beginning to see the walls come down, riots in Greece, similar failures coming in Spain, Ireland, Portugal, Hungary.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by jimf01
a resident of another community
on Jun 9, 2010 at 11:44 am

jimf01 is a registered user.

What CD-11 voters need to understand is unseating Jerry McNerney in November is the important role they play in changing the course of our economy.
If by some miracle, the GOP can take the gavel from Pelosi's hands, and then set us on a course toward smaller government and lower taxes (I don't have a lot of faith the current GOP will do this, but I am sure the Democrats will not), then the US can lead the world out of the recession.
Lower corporate taxes and a friendlier business environment will move investment out of Europe and to the US. It is still possible to GROW our way out of the economic problems we face.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Gine
a resident of another community
on Jun 9, 2010 at 1:10 pm

Dee...David Harmer's home is less than one mile from the border of District 11. The term carpetbagger is a term originally used to apply to northerners who headed to the deep south after the civil war to take office and take advantage. It has no relevance here. David does know the area and its problems. He has lived here for many years. I'm sure even you would agree that a person who lives 1/2 mile outside of the boundary is not an "outsider" unfamiliar with local conditions. You are either ignorant, a disgruntled Goehring supporter (I won't mention the actual, as opposed to fabricated, skeletons in his closet) or a McNerney opperative.
The same could be said for your lame disinformation about David taking "bailout" money. He had a job with Washington Mutual in their credit card division (the only profitable division by the way) when that bank was taken over by JPMorgan/Chase. He, along with many others whose jobs were now duplicates, lost his job. He was given severance pay. Hardly sinister. That's what happens when people lose their jobs. Then JPMorgan/Chase got some bailout money, along with a lot of other banks. Morgan has paid that money back in its entirety. So the actual facts are that David got severance pay from a bank that received some federal money. So, uh, Dee, remind me again what's the big deal? Or are you just planning to appeal to ignoramuses who wouldn't know the difference between a bogeyman and the tooth fairy? Get your fact straight.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ron
a resident of Las Positas
on Jun 9, 2010 at 5:26 pm

The gang of four GOP lightweights slung all the mud they wanted at each other and at Congressman Jerry McNerney but at the end of the day we are going to elect Jerry McNerney. Harmer now the GOP candidate DOES NOT EVEN LIVE IN OUR DISTRICT. How can he even begin to be considered as our Representative. Jerry has been a fantastic Congressman and has done great and hard work for us all. His leadership in getting his two bills passed and signed into law to increase benefits and care for our soldiers, veterans and families is a huge benefit for us in District 11. We are proud to send Jerry back to Washington to keep up his good work. Thank you Jerry McNerney!!!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by dublinmike
a resident of Dublin
on Jun 9, 2010 at 5:53 pm

dublinmike is a registered user.

jim01, "The more appropriate term is progressive." is closer and thank you for pointing this out. But, I would still not associate him with Pelosi, et al.

I realize that this thread is about Mr. Harmer and Rep McNerney but I would like to add this, you will now find Ms. Whitman moving away from the right and towards the center and my money is that if elected she will be center-right.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Lisa
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 9, 2010 at 6:03 pm

What is this, the 1950's?
Who cares if you call people "socialists"?
Oh my...such a bad word....
You people pay into the Social Security system, you will collect Social Security, the Federal government, under a Republican administration, effectively nationalized the banking and mortgage industries.
It was under a conservative GOP administration that we enacted the largest expansion of the welfare state in 30 years.
Please , you are the same group who helped bailout the banks, and your friends in Big Auto...
Ronald Reagan is rolling over in his grave.
But it's only Socialism when it helps the little guy...not when we bailout the big guys...like it' ok if it's done in a suit.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by jimf01
a resident of another community
on Jun 9, 2010 at 8:17 pm

Hey "Ron" - If you are going to post the SAME comment as you did on the Tracy Press website as "ChetW", the same comment you post in Stockton and Lodi and everywhere else, at least own it!

Chester Wood's cut and paste --> Web Link


Your talking point is wearing a little thin, when Congress' approval is at an all time low, your man Jerry McNerney votes with Nancy Pelosi and the Democrat Caucus 95% of the time, and Jerry states we have near 24% unemployment in this district, yet he still backs Obamacare, cap and trade, and any other spending program he thinks can save his job, increasing deficits and increasing taxes.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by jimf01
a resident of another community
on Jun 10, 2010 at 8:16 am

There is the next phase of the argument, from leftists like Lisa. Why is socialism such a bad word? We all pay social security?! Now, I will assume the Lisa knows the difference between socialism and social security.

Lisa, would you agree with this statement?

"From each, according to his or her ability, to each, according to his or her need"


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Chucky Cheese
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 10, 2010 at 8:31 am

Good luck to Harmer. We really need to get McNerney, Pelosi's pimp, out of office.

BTW, Dee, I truly fell for you condition, and you should seek professional help. First read "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder".


 +   Like this comment
Posted by susan
a resident of Pleasanton Valley
on Jun 10, 2010 at 9:09 am

The purpose of this exercise is to DEFEAT MCNERNEY WHO NEVER SAW A BILL THAT NANCY PELOSI PUT IN FRONT OF HIM THAT HE DID NOT LIKE, EVEN THOUGH THE CITIZENS OF HIS DISTRICT OPPOSED THEM. OBAMACARE, AND TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF WASTED MONEY. The 11th district is so broken up by the Democratic party who knows whats in it. WE NEED HARMER TO WIN SO THE CITIZENS CAN GET REPRESENTATION.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by resident
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 10, 2010 at 9:30 am

Thank you for your post, Ron! McNerney has done a GREAT job! I would like to know if any of the "complainers" have a pre-existing medical condition and have tried to BUY health insurance prior to the health care reform. Or, have any of you been laid off after 20 years working for a company, no severance package and then watched your COBRA cost go up to unaffordable amounts? Thank God for Obama's plan which supplemented COBRA costs and helped my family and others survive until we could find employment again!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Gary Palmatier
a resident of Stoneridge
on Jun 10, 2010 at 11:17 am

man oh man, it is amazing to see the vitriol and opinionated disinformation and just plain meaness floating around out there in little ol' P-ton. I am amazed too by reading all these comments (for the most part a lesson in what not to do with my time) that all the commenters apparently comment quite often and seem to be familiar with their adversaries and seem to have a need to get into pissing contests with each other, for lack of a better description.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Lisa
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 10, 2010 at 9:30 pm

Yes I would, Jim.
Socialism, social welfare programs..same difference. Help people in need.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by jimf01
a resident of another community
on Jun 10, 2010 at 9:32 pm

jimf01 is a registered user.

Oh, I am so glad you came back while I was here tonight. Do you know who that comes from? Do you know who said that?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by jimf01
a resident of another community
on Jun 10, 2010 at 9:35 pm

jimf01 is a registered user.

In a higher phase of communist society, after the enslaving subordination of the individual to the division of labor, and therewith also the antithesis between mental and physical labor, has vanished; after labor has become not only a means of life but life's prime want; after the productive forces have also increased with the all-around development of the individual, and all the springs of co-operative wealth flow more abundantly—only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be crossed in its entirety and society inscribe on its banners: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!
Web Link


 +   Like this comment
Posted by dublinmike
a resident of Dublin
on Jun 10, 2010 at 11:18 pm

dublinmike is a registered user.

Yo, jimf01-bo, "enslaving subordination of the individual to the division of labor" sounds like subjecting the worker to the rental value of his/her labor, which is pure capitalism.

Now, if you copied & paste this from some Lenin-dribble, I surely hope you knew what you were doing... you got the best laugh tonight.

You were kidding, right? Seriously, you were kidding, right??


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Amy
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 10, 2010 at 11:36 pm

Hey DublinMarx,
You are wrong (yet again).

You Said "enslaving subordination of the individual to the division of labor" sounds like subjecting the worker to the rental value of his/her labor, which is pure capitalism.

It is NOT pure capitalism because with capitalism the individual has a CHOICE whether to be employed by this employer (vs. being enslaved which is characteristic of socialism>marxism>communism. )

With capitalism, the focus is on the individual and their freedom to choose (which is diametrically opposed by democrats who long to "control" others.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Janna
a resident of Dublin
on Jun 10, 2010 at 11:47 pm

Janna is a registered user.

Amy,

Do you actually believe that most people have a choice about who they work for in this economy? Please, most people are just happy to have a job if they actually have one in the first place.

Capitalism is like the bell curve except with most on the bottom. Some people will always be at the bottom, like 95% or so. Choice is only available to those who can afford it. That is not real choice.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by jimf01
a resident of another community
on Jun 11, 2010 at 9:11 am

Hand that bell curve off to the marxists, and it will soon be flat as a board


 +   Like this comment
Posted by DublinMarx
a resident of Dublin
on Jun 12, 2010 at 4:47 pm

Fascist Amy, let me give it a try to clarify what I mean in the earlier post.

Capitalism focuses on getting the most profit out of the least cost, which make sense. It inherently looks for the lowest costs often by bidding out to the cheapest vendor, in the case of labor it's people. We rent our time. It also seeks to keep associated costs, such as medical or providing a safe working environment, but that's another topic.

BTW, my liberal friends accuse me of being a business conservative. I guess I can't win when I go up people with anger issues, whether it's Amy or the liberals.



 +   Like this comment
Posted by DublinMarx
a resident of Dublin
on Jun 12, 2010 at 4:59 pm

DublinMarx is a registered user.

Hey, I'm the real DublinMarx...the alter-ego of Dublinmike (thanks Amy for the idea!).

Power to the people, down with capitalism.

Amy, why Socialism and Communism fails: people are greedy. As soon as Lenin, Stalin, Mao, et al along with fascists such as Hitler and Mussolini, come into power then it's all about THEIR power. At least Capitalism doesn't hide this: greed.

But every system has its weak spots. For Capitalism, it's greed and the disregard by many businesses for humans. That's why we have to have some safety protections.

You cannot me a Marxist or a socialist (you really should look up the definitions) just because I have, as you perceive, a different viewpoint. Capitalism made this country great but it is not a flawless system. If I thought it was that bad I would have left.

God Bless America.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Amy
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 12, 2010 at 9:26 pm

DublinMarx:
Sounds like you are very comfortable with your new name.

Regarding "greed," your views are very consistent with the majority of leftists. You confuse the term "self-interest" with "greed." Most honest business people act out of self-interest (vs. greed) to improve their products and/or services to meet or exceed their customers' expectations.

Also regarding the concept of "greed" here is a very short and enlightening youtube on this topic. As Friedman states, "greed" is also found very prominently in "government" especially totalitarian governments...like the one your idol Obama is in the process of creating.

Here is the clip >>> Web Link

(And BTW: I have a very hard time believing anyone would mistake you as a conservative...especially as you slober all over your boy- (or girl-) friend, Nancy McNerney...who votes with Nancy 98% of the time.)




 +   Like this comment
Posted by Amy
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 12, 2010 at 11:53 pm

[Post removed because the poster name was falsified]


 +   Like this comment
Posted by jimf01
a resident of another community
on Jun 13, 2010 at 3:10 pm

jimf01 is a registered user.

Looks like you are the new target Amy..

Mike - I will be a bit more generous with you, at least you can give that "Capitalism made this country great" even if we "have to have some safety protections". On that, you and I can agree.
At the level you describe any "system" is the same in that an economy depends upon efficiencies, achieving efficiency in our global economy becomes more and more critical, we are competing against China and India.
It is my view that our own government is hobbling the US economy; if we enact cap & trade and other regulation which doesn't allow us to compete as a nation for one.
Now, I am not spouting protectionism, but if we don't produce, we will die. If we shut off pumps in the delta because smelt populations are low, we do not produce food which is an export as well as feeding our country.
There are many more examples. I see the amount of "safety protections" needed differently than you do. We do need to remain an economic superpower.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Not Endorsements
By Roz Rogoff | 9 comments | 1,232 views

A second half of life exceptionally well lived
By Tim Hunt | 1 comment | 658 views