Investigators: Obama using Connecticut Soc. Sec. Number State, National, International, posted by Wow, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on May 11, 2010 at 8:17 pm
Our Fraud in Chief has some 'splaining to do! "Two private investigators working independently are asking why President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state."
One investigator said "It is a crime to use more than one Social Security number, and Barack Obama had to have a previous Social Security number to have worked at Baskin Robbins," she insisted. "Under current law, a person is not permitted to use more than one Social Security number in a lifetime."
Let's see this SnakeOil Salesman wiggle out of this >>> Web Link
Posted by anti-stupid brigade, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on May 11, 2010 at 9:08 pm
You birthers are getting more and more pathetic every day. He's president. Get over it already. 2 minute google search turns up this:
"If there is any clear evidence of fraud, it is the 1890 date that Taitz flouts. First, if the SSN was really for a person born in 1890, that person would be dead. The Social Security death index doesn’t list this number, so we can presume that the 1890 date is bogus. However, there is more direct evidence that it’s wrong and Taitz knows it. In her own court filing in Barnett v. Obama (page 5) she shows where the 1890 date comes from. The document says:
Dates of Birth Associated with SSN:
Obviously the third is a typographical error on the correct date (the second) and 1890 is just database garbage. Which is the more likely date of birth from the preceding list? If you are convinced that everything Obama does is a fraud, then the first entry is the one to pick. If you’re looking for the real answer, you pick the one that makes sense, the President’s actual date of birth.
While Taitz claims that the SSN Obama uses “was issued to another individual”, she never says who that individual is, and this is because the record for that SSN belongs to none other than Barack Obama himself, as we see from Orly’s own filing.
What about the Connecticut number series? It’s an interesting question, but there’s no law that says you have to get your SSN from a Social Security office in the state where you reside. Nowadays, they are all processed centrally and the assignment is based on the zip code of the return address. My guess (and that’s all it is) is that Obama got his SSN as a child living in Indonesia and the application was just processed in Connecticut. What it most certainly does not mean is Taitz’s surprising conclusion: “foreign birth and lack of proper citizenship status.” (Connecticut is not a foreign country either.)"
Posted by Rat Turd, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on May 11, 2010 at 9:17 pm
I have absolutely no idea where the guy is from nor do I care. I do however believe he is without question the most inexperienced and to date the most incompetent President we have had and that unfortunately includes Jimmy Carter. We are in deep trouble. Now he wants congress to give him $29,000,000 for oil well inspectors..............geez!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Cindy B., a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on May 12, 2010 at 8:46 am
You need to seriously get some help. You have major league hate issues. Utilize you right to free speech and allow others to do so without put downs and you will be taken seriously. Without this in place you will just be disregarded as just another liberal who offers nothing but negatives and no solutions to problems.