Can the Weekly get rid of Kendall the space-waster? Around Town, posted by Annoyed, a resident of the Vintage Hills Elementary School neighborhood, on Oct 9, 2009 at 9:48 am
He's obviously shilling whatever drivel that he's trying to sell via his website. His posts aren't funny, don't add anything to the community, and make it even harder to find posts of value amid all the political stuff.
Posted by I agree, a resident of the Downtown neighborhood, on Oct 9, 2009 at 10:03 am
I cancelled my subscription due to his prolific no-talent threads. Yeserday there were 8 or more of his "stories" or whatever he calls that crap, on the first page alone of the forum. Every time he decides to spew his drivel it creates a new thread. Dear Gina and Jeb, dumb idea.
Posted by Original Joe, a resident of the Downtown neighborhood, on Oct 9, 2009 at 1:05 pm
He has a right, even if it is annoying. I just put him on my SKIP LIST along with cholo, Patriot Liberal, and so many others. I used to read 90% of these posts, now I skip 90%. Hard to find real substance anymore, but I still look.
Posted by Stacey, a resident of the Amberwood/Wood Meadows neighborhood, on Oct 9, 2009 at 2:03 pm Stacey is a member (registered user) of PleasantonWeekly.com
It's like throwing out the best part of a newspaper; the funnies. Sure, The Family Circus has been unfunny for most of its five decades, but children everywhere would never have known the joy of dotted lines.
Posted by M., a resident of the Downtown neighborhood, on Oct 9, 2009 at 5:05 pm M. is a member (registered user) of PleasantonWeekly.com
Little m it would seem that some of our loyal Pleasanton Weekly members do not understand what free speech is, nor the meaning of prattle, or tattle for that matter.
You want him banned because you do not like his posts?
They are mainly in the "prattle And Tattle" section.
Please look up the meaning of the word Prattle, and the word Tattle.
Why do you guys insist on calling for the banning of members, and flagging posts that are not offensive, or in any way a violation simply because you do not like them? If you want a a forum that only has content that you want to read go make your own.
Posted by little m, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Oct 10, 2009 at 8:16 am
First I want to note the use of the little "m" versus the the big "M" ... Big M is a very good poster and I do NOT, repeat, DO NOT want to disrupt his posts. So with that said ... Cholo ... all I said is that your wisdom is overshadowed at times by "te he's" et. al. Look at it as a literary critique not a personal criticism. I am attempting to enhance your literary quest not squelch it. So, with that said ... onward posters ... there are many fish to fry!!!!
Posted by Db, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Oct 21, 2009 at 9:29 pm
Pleasanton Parent: Don't be a JERK! Leave him alone and just stop reading them. Why do you have to be so mean? Why can't you just agree that you don't have to like everything you read? Are you so arrogant that you have to be in control of everything here in the forum that you actually have to FLAG every post he adds? I don't think everything is funny either...I don't read all of it.
Ahhh...it must be jealousy. You guys that are so angry and have so much time on your hands to slam bloggers are really truly sad...
Posted by Stacey, a resident of the Amberwood/Wood Meadows neighborhood, on Oct 21, 2009 at 10:09 pm Stacey is a member (registered user) of PleasantonWeekly.com
“well by golly it musta been one o’ them Martins just a chirpin’ and hopin’ an’ poopin’ all over the place -- sorta reminded me o’ the Mayor’s pet buzzard, er hawk er whatever that bird is. An’ sorta reminded the wife -- says she -- o' the Mayor herself.”
C'mon. Who doesn't think that was funny, especially the last line?