Town Square

Post a New Topic

PUSD summary of board actions on June 3

Original post made by Sandy, Mohr Park, on Jun 4, 2009

I just received an email via the district's e-connection, which briefly summarizes the action taken at last night's board meeting. I wanted to repost it here since not all parents (and I imagine very few citizens without kids in school) are signed up for district emails.

This story contains 215 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (3)

Like this comment
Posted by Mike
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 4, 2009 at 11:19 am

I’m concerned that they have chosen to cancel tomorrow’s meeting. It would seem that with the challenges the district faces, more time, not less, is needed in order for the board to work with the administration AND the public.

Like this comment
Posted by hard head
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 4, 2009 at 12:09 pm

what challenges? It's business as usual at PUSD. All the gloom and doom prior to Measure G were just show to get more money. We have the NO voters to thank for saving out butts.

Like this comment
Posted by Sandy
a resident of Mohr Park
on Jun 4, 2009 at 2:10 pm

This is *not* the same thing as what would have happened if measure G had passed.

If measure G had passed, over 65 additional positions could have been reinstated to keep class sizes at 20 instead of raising them to 25.

Strings and band for 4th and 5th graders would have been reinstated.

8 FTE custodians who have been laid off would have been reinstated.

7 counselors would be saved, not just 4.

Out of the 11.5 technology and library staff pink-slipped three months ago, only 3 were reinstated last night. 8 more would still be working for our children and teachers if measure G had passed.

I want to say this firmly. The board did not "find" $4.58 million in next year's budget. They found a way to make use of options they did not know they would have, when they put measure G on the ballot, to postpone about $1 million of the $9.7 million in cuts. For one year.

Next year, when the stimulus money is spent, another $8 million in cuts will need to be made.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

ValleyCare closes Livermore thrift store
By Tim Hunt | 0 comments | 1,354 views