Town Square

Post a New Topic

BART directors appear likely to raise fares on July 1

Original post made on Apr 24, 2009

BART directors signaled Thursday that they probably will raise fares by at least 6 percent on July 1 but they backed away from a staff proposal to raise fares by 10 percent across the board.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, April 24, 2009, 6:27 AM

Comments (9)

Posted by freida, a resident of Downtown
on Apr 24, 2009 at 10:07 am

What's the difference between Bart employees and the bank CEO's?
gimme, gimme, gimme. Bart employee's with their huge salaries and fat benefit packages should, like the rest of us, take a pay cut and be damned glad they have a job. So many people are unemployed and if they do have a job can't afford to get to it. Transportation costs are going up faster than child care and housing. Hey! I'd be happy to take one of those Bart jobs for less money. I can stand and be rude to riders and I could do it without the smug attitude.


Posted by DB, a resident of Kottinger Ranch
on Apr 24, 2009 at 11:42 am

I work at SFO. I know that hundreds of SFO workers take BART to work and many of them have jobs that don't pay alot. These people will be adversely effected by BART charging a surcharge to SFO. I'm sure the fat cats on the board couldn't care less. I for one will be getting back in my car. IT's a shame because I like riding BART, but I will be done, It will no longer be cost effective for me.


Posted by Qwerty, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Apr 25, 2009 at 11:30 am

I'm tired of seeing costs passed onto the individuals instead of the organizations in question controling costs and making cutbacks. Before BART even THINKS about raising fares they should tell us what they are doing to control their budget. Forget BART! I'll drive my Prius and listen to audio books in the car if I have to drive into the city.

poo on you BART! You stink!


Posted by Qwerty, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Apr 25, 2009 at 12:59 pm


Another thing that bothers me about the proposed increases will be the effect it has on people who have NO OTHER CHOICE but to take BART. I'm fortunate in that I have a nice car to drive that gets great gas mileage. What about those that don't have a car? Or who share a car with a spouse/partner and have no alternatives. They are FORCED into paying higher fees, which I think is absolutely unfair.


Posted by AV, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Apr 25, 2009 at 2:49 pm

Wow, lots of interesting points of view.
At first I was going to say that at least BART is dealing with its budget problems by asking those who actually use BART to help solve their budget problems.
But Qwerty has a good point and I'm reminded that I've seen many people exiting the BART station in Pleasanton and either walking home, or taking a bus home. Increased fares will be hard on them, and does seem unfair since they're actually using public transportation and reducing their carbon footprints.
It just seems as if every aspect of the economy has imploded in the last few months.


Posted by Libertarian, a resident of Castlewood
on May 5, 2009 at 1:26 pm

Sell BART (and WHEELS) to a private corporation. Let it make it or break it depending on the market. I never take BART so I don't want my (local, state, and federal) taxes supporting somebody else's transportation welfare. We should all be driving single occupancy autos anyway to stimulate the economy (global warming is an Al Gore hoax, BTW).

This is America! If you can't afford a car, then get a better job so you can! How hard is that to understand?


Posted by Sue, a resident of Downtown
on May 5, 2009 at 1:48 pm

I don't even bother with BART anymore as it is filthy and some pretty unsavory characters hang out on it. Many of the seats are stained and honestly the cars smell of urine.


Posted by Bart is also Noisy, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 6, 2009 at 10:45 am

Apparently BARTD, which promised comfortable seats, and quiet cars, is now installing noisy floor coverings, which amplify the track and motor noise. It is really loud!
If they must remove the carpet, couldn't they install some sort of underlayment to cut down on noise?

They also promised to run the train to Livermore.
Those people have been forced to pay BARTD Taxes for over 25 years, but have no station, and nearly no way to get to BARTD, yet BARTD has money to build a second station for Dublin.

What ever happened to integrity?


Posted by Sue, a resident of Downtown
on May 6, 2009 at 11:03 am

They ripped out the carpeting because they could not keep it clean or did not want to routinely clean it and did this to reduce cost. They put down a solid floor covering which they can just wash with soap and water which they also do not do as it also is filthy. You should ask Scott Haggerty our county supervisor or Mr. greed and graft about why it is not into Livermore. Maybe the money was spent to settle some of his sexual harrassment cases out of court.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Moneyball, the Sequel: Billy Beane for President!
By Tom Cushing | 6 comments | 953 views

Spedowfski Announces run for Livermore City Council
By Roz Rogoff | 1 comment | 854 views

Planning the "Pleasanton way"
By Tim Hunt | 8 comments | 802 views

Take Full Advantage of Free Standardized Testing Opportunities
By Elizabeth LaScala | 0 comments | 299 views