Town Square

Post a New Topic

Reclaiming Our Basic Freedoms: Property Rights Against Encroaching Demographic Groups

Original post made by Mad as heck!, Another Pleasanton neighborhood, on Jul 10, 2013

We have long passed the tragic decade of the 1960s in which liberal social engineering was forced down the public's throat at the expense of individual liberties. These include, to name only a few, the Voting Rights Act, Civil Rights legislation, and laws that tolerate women murdering their babies, which has since guaranteed that nearly 1/3 of women in the United States are murderers.

The Supreme Court recently showed rare courage in rolling back parts of the Voting Rights Act. The court decision reflects what we are now beginning to realize: the federal government was wrong to step into the affairs of the freedom-seeking states, and continues to be wrong today.

The decision should be a source of encouragement for all decent Americans. Using the same logic, it is now time for the courts to revisit unjust Civil Rights legislation of the past. How the liberal 1960s court could have ruled that restaurant owners and hotel proprietors must serve 'everyone' is beyond me. Are we not a nation of freedom? Why should I be forced to share my toothbrush with some neighbor with a decayed mouth down the street? Well, fortunately we're not there yet. But we're moving in that direction.

So, why should a hotel proprietor be forced to open his rooms to dirty and unkempt people who are more than likely to repel decent people and scare them off the premises? Why should a restauranteur be forced to serve hamburgers to uncivilized people who will intimidate everyone else in the restaurant?

This is the nub of our great nation's libertarian revolt against the forces of socialist engineering. Our Founding Fathers had no intention to make us share our toothbrushes. Nor did they want to make us sell goods, whether hamburgers or houses, to those from undesirable demographics.

Our country is entering a new phase, and the recent Supreme Court decision suggests that we may be able to do what decent people have wanted to do for a long time: Preserve our liberty by keeping the undesirables at bay.

The money saved by home owners would be enormous. The federal government forces us to sell our homes to undesirables, and it has a negative effect on all home values in the neighborhood. Surely this is not what our Founding Fathers wanted.

Friends and neighbors, we have so much to gain, so much money to keep in our pockets if we can only keep certain people in the demographic groups and areas in which they belong. We can do so as morally principled peoples who realize that our greatest freedom is that of keeping our hard-earned investments and inheritances in our own pockets where they belong.

The Supreme Court, with the exception of the gay perversion ruling, is moving in the right direction, and with God willing, will continue to move in that direction. But it cannot be fast enough. Please write your Congressional representative, urging them to consider writing up and passing legislation that will repair the damage that was done by the liberal socialist engineers over the past decades.

Beyond that, join your local TEA Party group of loyal and patriotic Americans. We're talking basic freedom here.

Comments (10)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by B. Rodriguez
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jul 10, 2013 at 9:30 am

Troll much?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Cholo
a resident of Livermore
on Jul 10, 2013 at 9:33 am

Your speech is sooooo inspiring! Where can I go to jump on the bandwagon!

VIVA AMERICA! VOLVO AMERICA!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Cholo
a resident of Livermore
on Jul 10, 2013 at 9:36 am

this article is copied from another web page...tee hee hee

b u s t e D!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Cholo
a resident of Livermore
on Jul 10, 2013 at 9:39 am

The USA is already a Third World Nation!

VIVA!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Cholo
a resident of Livermore
on Jul 10, 2013 at 9:47 am

The above article is a perfect definition of RACIAL PROFILING: Web Link


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Smiley Face
a resident of Castlewood
on Jul 10, 2013 at 1:29 pm

LMAO! What a looney.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Cholo
a resident of Livermore
on Jul 10, 2013 at 4:02 pm

Volvo America! VOLVO!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by deek
a resident of Amador Estates
on Jul 10, 2013 at 7:48 pm

I guess I need more info. Who are these undiserables? 20-30 something year olds who cant afford the lifestyle of the rich and the famous? Gays? Im confused and would be interested in clarification.

Best

Deek


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ah Geez
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jul 10, 2013 at 10:45 pm

"This is the nub of our great nation's libertarian revolt against the forces of socialist engineering."

Ah Geez, libertarians have a problem... they have little control over their life and project that outwards.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Cholo
a resident of Livermore
on Jul 11, 2013 at 11:31 am

lives!


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Vote YES on Measures 45, 46, & 47, NO on 48
By Roz Rogoff | 30 comments | 2,172 views

Prop 47: not perfect, just preferable.
By Tom Cushing | 2 comments | 869 views

The Vranesh situation heads to court
By Tim Hunt | 7 comments | 678 views