Pleasanton Weekly..unbiased editing? Around Town, posted by Truth, a resident of the Birdland neighborhood, on Jul 27, 2012 at 9:18 pm
How does the public feel about the editing being conducted by Pleasanton Weekly staff? Do you think it is fair to edit comments based on an unknown set of rules? Are they doing a good job? What are your thoughts?
Posted by Pete , a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Jul 27, 2012 at 10:21 pm
Look at it this way...they are a business,first. Reporting can be a thankless job...so most(journalists) should feel what they are doing is important...which it is. Because the Independent newspaper has never found an affordable housing project it didn't endorse, within Pleasanton...it continued to provide thought provoking writing to their readers, and promote participation. So...what's the fuss? Thank you, Pleasanton Weekly, for giving me my say. Bottomline...this is their newspaper, their blog, their money and their time. If the Pleasanton Weekly could share again... what they represent to Community...it might go a long way to this subject matter, posted by Truth, to answer her/his question to themselves.
Posted by Doug Miller, a resident of the Country Fair neighborhood, on Jul 27, 2012 at 10:58 pm
I am all I favor of PW editing comments IAW published rules. Too many comments are in the form of personal attacks or go off topic. The Belmont Club published under the auspices of pjmedia.com has the following rules that work well:
PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at email@example.com.
Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger, a resident of the Vintage Hills Elementary School neighborhood, on Jul 28, 2012 at 8:15 am Kathleen Ruegsegger is a member (registered user) of PleasantonWeekly.com
Last updated: Thursday, November 13, 2008 11:57 AM
You agree to be respectful of others, be truthful and be solely responsible for all postings you make.
You agree not to use any profanity, nor post any information that is hateful, libelous or obscene, or that is threatening, abusive or offensive to any individual, group or class of person.
You agree not to post comments under multiple names. Postings within a single topic from the same IP address made under different names will be deleted.
You agree not to disclose personal information about another person, nor post anything that misleads others as to the source of the posting.
You grant to Embarcadero Media a nonexclusive license to republish in its newspapers or in other media formats, at its sole discretion, all or portions of the content you post on PleasantonWeekly.com.
You agree not to post anything on PleasantonWeekly.com that is not your original work, unless you know with certainty that it is legally in the public domain and permissible under U.S. copyright laws.
You agree not to make posts that are primarily intended to promote, or create links to another Website.
You agree not to make posts of a commercial nature that promote a business, product or service.
You agree not to republish in any form the posts that others make on PleasantonWeekly.com.
PleasantonWeekly.com is hosted on servers located in California and is intended to be viewed primarily by residents of California. In the event of any dispute arising out of or relating to this site, you agree that the exclusive venue for litigating disputes shall be in state or federal court in San Jose, California.
Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger, a resident of the Vintage Hills Elementary School neighborhood, on Jul 28, 2012 at 9:44 am Kathleen Ruegsegger is a member (registered user) of PleasantonWeekly.com
There were good discussions out here prior to the arrival of simon/steven/whatever. Make it personal; I'll respond. And here, all I posted was the current rules from the PW. I must be some kind of threat to y'all; otherwise why spend so much time on personal attacks rather than the topic.
Posted by Pete , a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Jul 28, 2012 at 10:12 am
Rules of enagement change all the time...outdated and require to be revised. Having won a breakfast on the over/under who might answer the initial question..."If the Pleasanton Weekly could share again" no disrespect intended.
Posted by whatever, the Golem, a resident of the California Reflections neighborhood, on Jul 28, 2012 at 12:46 pm
The hypocrisy coming from the right is a laugh; the censorship coming from PW is sad.
Yes, Staceleen, it's all about you. And, yes, that discussion you willingly participated in with steven@stoneridge re. auto taxes and tracking devices wasn't very good at all. It was terrible. People citing J.S. Mill and actually dissecting another's arguments. Gasp. Terrible. Yes, because you're such a threat to us all, despite the content of your ideas carrying no force whatsoever.
I do agree with Staceleen. Whatever happened to the good old days when rightwing racists could post here and not be challenged by the diseased lefty loons?
Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger, a resident of the Vintage Hills Elementary School neighborhood, on Jul 28, 2012 at 1:34 pm Kathleen Ruegsegger is a member (registered user) of PleasantonWeekly.com
No more than pondering the over the top vitriol. Mill was noted to be flawed by "steven". If the comments are based on a flawed Mill, there is no need to respond.
The attempts by anyone to put other posters into presumptive boxes (rightwing racists, lefty loons) does not contribute to the discussions. Yes, I would lament that people can't agree to disagree and let it stand.
Posted by Arnold, a resident of the California Somerset neighborhood, on Jul 28, 2012 at 1:41 pm
So true. I miss the good ol days when Kathleen and Stacey, Uncle Homerrr and Cholo, Dark Corners of Town and jimf01 would roam the plains of the Pleasanton Weekly forum like delusional gazelles in some sort of open-air mental hospital. Now, some have been cured, one or two have made real-world friends and joined the living, and too few remain to compulsorily post their screeds on whatever thread they shuffle haphazardly into. Now Steve, Mittens, Nurse Shark and other voices try to bring rationality to the asylum, disturbing the inmates and frightening them into ever more strident and frequent jeremiads. Can't we just go back to irrational times, when people believed in trickle-down economics, the Bush Doctrine, Death Squads, Terror Babies, deregulation, and austerity? Remaining inmates: retake the asylum before it's too late!
Posted by New Jersey Vinnie, a resident of the Civic Square neighborhood, on Jul 28, 2012 at 2:20 pm
Here we have little Ms. Ego backtracking on Mill: He's flawed, so why comment? I mean, why not stop to see whether my perceived 'flaws' are the same as yours? Well, because little Ms. Ego hasn't actually read the book. It's one thing to simply not be an intellectual. I can understand that. But to be too insecure to own up to the truth of the matter is a bit sad and pathetic. Does she truly expect anyone, with the exception perhaps of the unstable guy whose always yelling about liberals being diseased, to believe her? Speaks to the fantasy world a rigid ideology puts one in.
Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger, a resident of the Vintage Hills Elementary School neighborhood, on Jul 28, 2012 at 2:39 pm Kathleen Ruegsegger is a member (registered user) of PleasantonWeekly.com
I'm not the one saying Mill was flawed. There is no path to reasoning with steven. And then, NJV, has to include several presumptions.
I find that there are works (or parts of them) which resonate and those to leave behind--doesn't make the author or the reader flawed. Not everything applies to each individual's experiences or thought processes.
Posted by Stacey, a resident of the Amberwood/Wood Meadows neighborhood, on Jul 29, 2012 at 12:21 am Stacey is a member (registered user) of PleasantonWeekly.com
The good old days was back when we used to argue about the merits of Oak Grove and the Stoneridge Dr. extension and Nimby was the worst accusation. Then Casey wrote that begging letter to the community while refusing to make proactive changes. Someone got their panties in a bunch when the parcel tax was voted down. Now they just spend all their time on a personal crusade to shut down conversation here by even attacking people who campaigned FOR the parcel tax. No thread is too sacred for the person behind the attacks, not even the mother-daughter tragedy. The PW seems to think it's an appropriate use of their website.
Posted by New Jersey Vinnie, a resident of the Civic Square neighborhood, on Jul 29, 2012 at 7:02 am
Staceleen makes a good point. She knows what's appropriate so much better than do PW editors or anyone else for that matter.
Discussing local issues, such as her apparent fear that Foothill is going to be shut down, is good. Questioning the moral or ideological presumptions of discussants, or their premisses, is baaaaaaaaad.
Posted by New Jersey Vinnie, a resident of the Civic Square neighborhood, on Jul 29, 2012 at 8:20 am
... and rather than confronting another's argument, showing where it might lack merit, I'll just call it inappropriate and plea for PW editors to censor it. And if show effectively the lack of merit in so many of my own mushy claims, I'll go running to editors with my cry wolf victimization card. Oh, they're being soooooo PERsonal in attacking my ideas! Whine, whine, whine, lots of posturing, and more whine, whine, whine.
Posted by New Jersey Vinnie, a resident of the Civic Square neighborhood, on Jul 29, 2012 at 9:43 am
Staceleen, you're being disingenuous again! Shame on you! Your alter ego, Staceleen, has stated several times that she/you are very much opposed to parents being govt mandated to place their kids in cars without restraint. Are you now saying you disagree with yourself? Kindly please elaborate!
Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger, a resident of the Vintage Hills Elementary School neighborhood, on Jul 29, 2012 at 11:01 am Kathleen Ruegsegger is a member (registered user) of PleasantonWeekly.com
[Kath]leen said . . . I don't think it needed to be mandated. I have/will use all safety options available to me. I don't automatically assume the majority of the population is too stupid to keep their children safe.
Posted by steven, a resident of the Stoneridge neighborhood, on Jul 29, 2012 at 1:29 pm
Staceleen, who cares sooooo much about children states: "I don't think [child safety seats in cars] needed to be mandated. I have/will use all safety options available to me. I don't automatically assume the majority of the population is too stupid to keep their children safe."
Well, Staceleen, how many kids will have had to have died to convince you that there are lots and lots of parents out there who ARE too stupid to keep their children safe? Oh, oh, quick! Turn away. Change subject! Change subject! Call in your Stacey persona!
You see, Staceleen's ideology covers EVERYBODY (provided they are just like her), but it excludes kids and can't come to grips with how sometimes the govt must step in to protect children from bad parents. And that so doing is not Big Brother at all, but a benevolent democratic and enlightened state that has actors acting in the service of the people, not some little, pin-headed, rightwing ideology that Western civilization saw fit to reject 150 years ago.
Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger, a resident of the Vintage Hills Elementary School neighborhood, on Jul 29, 2012 at 7:42 pm Kathleen Ruegsegger is a member (registered user) of PleasantonWeekly.com
Well, if I'm going to be perfectly honest, I do think there is at least one stupid person. My remaining comments are on the actual thread about tracking devices to collect yet another never ending tax.
Posted by New Jersey Vinnie, a resident of the Civic Square neighborhood, on Jul 30, 2012 at 7:02 am
Yes, Staceleen refuses to address the question about the likelihood of kids dying if parents are not mandated to use car safety seats. If she cared about kids, truly, she'd address it. Ah, but to honestly confront it would mean her rigid ideology would have to be cast by the wayside as it has been cast by Western thought, some 150 years ago, onto the trash heap of ideological rubbish.
What stands out here, even more than the paucity of Staceleen ability to think independent of ideology, is her dishonesty.
Posted by liberalism is a disease, a resident of the Birdland neighborhood, on Jul 30, 2012 at 9:34 am liberalism is a disease is a member (registered user) of PleasantonWeekly.com
steven: 'Well, Staceleen, how many kids will have had to have died to convince you that there are lots and lots of parents out there who ARE too stupid to keep their children safe?'
Please tell me you don't have kids. Or, are you one of those 'lots and lots of parents' you were referring to?
In any case, you guys should either get a room, or meet at a neutral site and hash out your differences. Your constant sniping at one or two women on these posts is only serving to publicly embarass yourself.
Posted by New Jersey Vinnie, a resident of the Stoneridge neighborhood, on Jul 30, 2012 at 4:23 pm
Care to say anything of substance? Or is hate all you have? Thought so. Of course, you child haters like to flock together.
Looking for something to do while you stew at everything under the sun? Try learning how to spell. Your spelling is almost as appalling as Staceleen's inability to reason outside right-wing ideological recipe boxes.