Town Square

Post a New Topic

Another Alameda County Superior Court Frank Roesch Decision overturned

Original post made by First Amendment, Downtown, on May 30, 2012

Looks like another California Appeals Court has thrown out a Frank Roesch verdict. In this case, the Appeals Court ruled that a defamation lawsuit filed by a bank had no merit and was actually protected free speech.

Wonder what would have happened had three city council members actually appealed the Frank Roesch Urban Habitat decision?



Court dismisses Oakland bank's libel suit over Craigslist rant

Bay City News Service
Posted: 05/30/2012 09:27:41 PM PDT
Updated: 05/30/2012 09:27:42 PM PDT

SAN FRANCISCO -- A state appeals court on Wednesday dismissed an Oakland bank's libel lawsuit against a former executive who posted derogatory comments about the bank online in the "Rants and Raves" section of Craigslist
....
The bank sued him for defamation in Alameda County Superior Court, claiming the comments were false and libelous. Rogers contended in pretrial proceedings that his posts were protected free speech.
In today's decision, a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeal in San Francisco ordered dismissal of the case and overturned a 2010 ruling in which Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch declined to toss out the lawsuit.

Comments (1)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Stacey
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on Jun 15, 2012 at 4:20 pm

Stacey is a registered user.

Compares with the brilliance of the Oak Grove judge who dismissed the Lin lawsuit against the City for the poison pill language: Web Link

"The panel said it had decided to act despite being "ordinarily reluctant to interfere with a decision of this type.""


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Vote YES on Measures 45, 46, & 47, NO on 48
By Roz Rogoff | 30 comments | 2,167 views

Prop 47: not perfect, just preferable.
By Tom Cushing | 2 comments | 863 views

The Vranesh situation heads to court
By Tim Hunt | 7 comments | 676 views