Town Square

Post a New Topic

Any Update on Double Shooting?

Original post made by anon, Nolan Farms, on May 16, 2012

So about a week and a half has passed since this tragedy, are they authorities any closer to answers?

Comments (8)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by may
a resident of Canyon Meadows
on May 16, 2012 at 5:11 pm

I've been wondering the same thing. The silence has led me to believe it was a murder/suicide since there seems to be no urgency in updating the public which I think they would have done if it were anyone else just as a safety thing if they thought there was a murderer walking among us. Very sad situation and I am praying for the family. I do hope PPD provides an update soon. You can't help but wonder since this happened so very close to home.

RIP.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Homer
a resident of Downtown
on May 18, 2012 at 8:33 am

S C O T T P E T E R S O N


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Don
a resident of Bridle Creek
on May 18, 2012 at 4:56 pm

Whatever happens, its important that all you geniuses who want to blame matters on guns remember something: Guns don't kill people, people do. Its just as easy to strangle someone with your own hands than to shoot them. And, also, think about all the accidental stranglings that far outnumber accidental shootings. Just think about it, geniuses.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by anon
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 21, 2012 at 12:11 pm

@ Don

It is not "just as easy to strangle someone with your hands as it is to shoot them with a gun". Strangulation requires personal contact, and the possiblity that the victim could defend themself. With a gun, the aggressor could be any size, small or large, against a victim or multiple victims, of any size, small or large, and win with a shot. Just like you don't bring a knife to a gun fight, you don't bring your bare hands to a gun fight either. And to the contrary of all the movies and tv shows that depict otherwise, once you are shot, you aren't in a fighting mode any more.

Also, unless you are a regular handler of weapons, whether in your job or as a hobby where you train for hours, most people who own guns wouldn't be able to access it and use it fast enough to shoot or disarm an assalaint anyways. If you keep a loaded gun in your nightstand drawer (hoping you have no children in the house) and you are awaken from a sound sleep with someone standing over you with a gun, your not going to be quick enough to shoot them first, they are already in offense mode, you are still hazy. And if you keep it in a lock box on the closet shelf, well do I need to go further. If you look at the statistics you will find that more gun owners are accidentlly injured from their own weapon than they are using it to deter a crime or criminal.

And, is there really any reason for any private citizen to have the need for an assualt rifle (AK-47, etc.). These weapons were designed for combat, to be able to take out many in a short time. They are not used in target practice, competiton, or hunting. So why should a private citizen have the need for one? The only need is for criminal activity, and isn't that who we are trying to take the guns away from?

The argument that "guns don't kill people, people kill people"; isn't quite true. There are many reports where guns have accidently discharged and injured or killed people. And that was without intent from any person.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by brian
a resident of Val Vista
on May 24, 2012 at 4:40 pm

Anon
Read the second amendment and you will get your answer why law abiding citizens should be able to have an AK-47. Gun laws only hurt good people. Criminals dont care about gun laws. Not sure why people dont understand this.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by David
a resident of California Somerset
on May 24, 2012 at 4:48 pm

My neighbor's boy, 8 years old, got hold of a .44 magnum and blew a hole in his friend's chest. I guess the 2nd amendment didn't help either of the kids much. Guns don't kill people, 8 year-olds do.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by brian
a resident of Val Vista
on May 26, 2012 at 4:00 am

@ David
I am suppose to get all emotional now? Dont blame the gun or the second amendment, blame the dumb gun owner on that one. If the second amendement falls, so will the rest.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Don
a resident of Bridle Creek
on May 26, 2012 at 8:17 am

That's right, Brian. It's important that we continue to put guns in the hands of dumb clucks like yourself so that after yet more avoidable tragic violence you and me can trot out the 2nd Amendment defense. Regarding David's example ... you know, that kid could just as easily have died from toxic waste. Toxic waste dumps don't kill people, people do.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Duck!
By Tom Cushing | 25 comments | 1,419 views

The Giving Season
By Roz Rogoff | 3 comments | 942 views

Thanksgiving Transfer Fever!
By Elizabeth LaScala | 0 comments | 605 views

Thankful season for ValleyCare
By Tim Hunt | 0 comments | 480 views