Town Square

Post a New Topic

Battling a new Wal-Mart concept

Original post made by Tim Hunt, Castlewood, on Feb 16, 2012

This story contains 508 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (10)

Like this comment
Posted by Stacey
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on Feb 16, 2012 at 9:47 am

Stacey is a registered user.

Two things:
- Fresh 'N' Easy is run by Tesco, one of the world's largest retailers.
- The City should create a new law preventing similar anonymous applications.


Like this comment
Posted by SteveP
a resident of Parkside
on Feb 16, 2012 at 10:04 am

SteveP is a registered user.

Good write up. No doubt you'll receive lots of flak from the organized mob, but there's no arguing the points you made about the planning commission's responsibilities. Matt Sullivan's attempts at social engineering our out of place and unwelcome in a free society.


Like this comment
Posted by SteveP
a resident of Parkside
on Feb 16, 2012 at 10:09 am

SteveP is a registered user.

If, as has been said many times before in the numerous topics posted about Wal Mart, the filing is a like-for-like business, why should it matter who files the application, an agent or the CEO of the company?
Unless you're planning on promoting Matt Sullivan's 'discretion' in the planning process, we don't need yet another law to govern what should be a very straight forward process.


Like this comment
Posted by Stacey
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on Feb 16, 2012 at 12:19 pm

Stacey is a registered user.

I agree that the process should be very straight forward, which is why I think it wrong to allow such anonymous applications. The ability to create an anonymous application is clearly being used as a government-supported competitive business tactic by Wal-Mart. A more level playing field would be to have either all anonymous applications or require more transparency in the application process.


Like this comment
Posted by franco
a resident of Vineyard Hills
on Feb 16, 2012 at 8:24 pm

franco is a registered user.

Transparency is always a good thing. However, what evil is created by anonymous applications that substitute one grocery store for another previous grocery store where no substantive changes are requested? If this is a business tactic, then it is available to all applicants on an equal basis. Why make a law against it? In fact one could argue that all such applications should be anonymous in order to prevent discrimination against applicants, such as is occurring in this case.


Like this comment
Posted by Stacey
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on Feb 16, 2012 at 9:33 pm

Stacey is a registered user.

"If this is a business tactic, then it is available to all applicants on an equal basis."

Yes, I had considered that the anonymity is equally available. If one business is doing it (and they're doing it nation-wide really) to gain an advantage over competition, others will too. "A more level playing field would be to have either all anonymous applications or require more transparency in the application process." Is anonymity the right direction to go in?


Like this comment
Posted by Sherryg
a resident of Ponderosa
on Feb 17, 2012 at 12:41 pm

Sherryg is a registered user.

If the applicant would have remained anoymous, everyone would have been thrilled that a new grocery store was going in to replace Nob Hill. There would have been no protesting.
Now that everyone knows it's Walmart, people crawl out of the woodwork to protest.


Like this comment
Posted by franco
a resident of Vineyard Hills
on Feb 18, 2012 at 5:40 pm

franco is a registered user.

My key point is freedom of choice, not creating a law that says everyone must apply anonymously or everyone must identify themselves in a zoning application. Not unlike posting on the these blogs. You have the freedom to be anonymous or you can identify yourself. You choose the tactic to suit your purpose. For example, if you fear your children may be discriminated against if you criticize the teacher's unions in a PW blog, you will most likely choose to go anonymous. This is no different than what Walmart is doing. They know they will be discriminated against, which is now happening before our very eyes.


Like this comment
Posted by Stacey
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on Feb 19, 2012 at 9:30 am

Stacey is a registered user.

It's an interesting discussion. The anonymity didn't really prevent discrimination. Like on this blog, where anonymous posters can still be identified through their writing, Wal-Mart's tactic of applying anonymously for grocery store permits (and then revealing themselves later) is a sign the opposition looks for. The OurPleasanton (Saint Consulting) group sent out anonymous flyers to the neighborhood containing factual inaccuracies well in advance of anyone else having a clue. I would argue that transparency would not necessarily have increased discrimination, but the average citizen would have had a clearer picture.


Like this comment
Posted by franco
a resident of Vineyard Hills
on Feb 19, 2012 at 5:37 pm

franco is a registered user.

So, the average citizen would have a clearer picture of what? The unions are hunting for Walmart to keep them out, and Walmart is using various tactics, including temporary anonymity, to put stores in target locations. I think at this point the average citizen has a pretty clear picture of what is going on. And no change to zoning application requirements was needed. All parties had freedom of choice to pursue their agenda in their own way.

In fact, the present case exemplifies how far some of our elected officials will travel to use their governmental powers to discriminate against those whom they have prejudice. Whether the greater public good is served is not really considered by them. They seem to serve at best a narrow base of the citizenry from whom they are assured their vote.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


To post your comment, please login or register at the top of the page. This topic is only for those who have signed up to participate by providing their email address and establishing a screen name.

Pleasanton Costco appears headed to crowded November ballot
By Tim Hunt | 11 comments | 1,432 views

Bikes and Cars don't mix
By Roz Rogoff | 6 comments | 348 views