Town Square

Post a New Topic

Call Jerry McNerney's DC office at (202) 225-1947 to VOTE NO on JOBS KILLING CAP & TRADE BILL! He's voting today...and will likely vote YES!

Original post made by Amy, Downtown, on Jun 26, 2009

Congress will vote on cap and tax today- call Jerry McNerney’s DC office at (202) 225-1947 and tell him to vote against this jobs killing, national energy tax bill

This story contains 864 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (15)

Like this comment
Posted by Cholo
a resident of Livermore
on Jun 26, 2009 at 9:19 am

oh my...


Like this comment
Posted by I like air
a resident of Southeast Pleasanton
on Jun 26, 2009 at 11:19 am

Thanks, I will make sure to phone McNierney today and tell him I support clean energy and to vote FOR the cap and trade bill. Stop the scare tactics--the time to change is now.


Like this comment
Posted by mary
a resident of Birdland
on Jun 26, 2009 at 11:34 am

Do you realize this bill will result in a doubling (at least) of our electric bills and will eliminate literally over a million jobs in the US...to China? This bill is the LARGEST TAX in US history...over the masquerade of JUNK SCIENCE. It is really about total control of government over our lives.


Like this comment
Posted by Stupid is as Stupid does
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 26, 2009 at 11:55 am

Besides loosing jobs, and increasing taxes, the real goal is to REDISTRIBUTE WEALTH.

I called and got right through but we all know how he is voting.


Like this comment
Posted by Yo Stupidis as Stupid does
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 26, 2009 at 12:39 pm

"the real goal is to REDISTRIBUTE WEALTH"

Oh Republicans never do that. $750 Billion TARP giveaway to wealthy investment bankers. If that isn't wealth redistribution, I don't know what is.

Republican:

Long definition: Welfare for the rich
Short definition: Loser



Like this comment
Posted by Stupidis as Stupid does
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 26, 2009 at 2:09 pm

Yo says "Oh Republicans never do that"

YO: I gotta believe you have more depth to yourself that.Please tell me you do. You present no insight. You make it a Republican vs Dem issue? Why not just look at the bill (last I checked we were commenting on Cap n trade not TARP...but for the record I did not support that.)

I am against Gov re-distribution of wealth. Period.

Look at the OUTCOME of this bill vs trying to link "catchy" definitions to political parties.

It will affect you and your family. It will affect the poorest of people(look at the WV/PA coal industry) as well as the people you want to "label" losers.

It a tax. Period. And by definition of a tax, it raises money to finance government programs and services. It will redistrubite wealth under the guies of "saving the enviornment" It does NOTHING for the environment, as its proponents claim. I repeat: It is a TAX, period.

Like most TAXES, it confiscates wealth and seeks to redistribute it. Under this scheme, companies who overproduce (emissions) will pay for the privilege in the form of "Carbon Credits", on an exchange based in Chicago (where else?). These credits will be awarded by the government, but "traded" on this exchange like a commodity. Under producers can "sell" their "credits" to the over producers, thus effecting a wealth transfer from the "haves" to the "have nots", meanwhile, the "emissions" are not reduced!

BTW, India and China are NOT SUBJECT to this plan! Another facet - the over producers will be penalized, in the form of a tax, including having to buy the "credits" - more transference of wealth!

This entire bill of goods does NOTHING to reduce emissions, and will wind up costing BILLIONS of DOLLARS, and exploding utility costs and by admsiion of this white house, loose jobs! Did you know that have a built in "insurance policy" for those who the WH knows will loose thier jobs???

Everyone will pay more becaue we are a country that depends on energy and a country that depends on the productivity of people.

Follow the MONEY - Obama sat on the board of the Joyce Foundation when the funding to create the "Chicago Climate Exchange" was approved, along with funding for "Chicage Schools Initiative" - John Ayers project (sound familiar - William's brother). Chicago Climate Exchange board members include Maurice Strong (involved in the "Oil for Food" UN scandal) Mayor Richard Daley, the largest shareholder is Goldman Sachs - can you remember what happened to Goldman Sachs?

This link explains more:
view link

and Al Gore hyping "Carbon Credits" - available from whom? Why Al Gore's company - here is the quote:

Gore buys his carbon off-sets from himself--the Generation Investment Management LLP, "an independent, private, owner-managed partnership established in 2004 with offices in London and Washington, D.C." of which he is both chairman and founding partner.

So, YO, I wish it was simple as "Republicans never do that". But like most issues, step back and study the details. Don't be so simple minded as to hide behind the political party of your choice. You only position yourself to see no evil, hear no evil but quick to label!




Like this comment
Posted by stupid is as stupid does
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 26, 2009 at 2:14 pm



sorry here is web link for above link I cited.

hope it works.

Web Link


Like this comment
Posted by I like air
a resident of Southeast Pleasanton
on Jun 26, 2009 at 4:39 pm

Way to go Jerry--he just voted yes on cap and trade.
"Junk science?" Indeed. Thank God Obama is listening
to the scientists. Cap and trade will NOT "double our electrticity bills", "eliminate jobs and send them to India or China", or even,
"redistribute wealth"...you people are nuts, honest to God.
It's sad that you're so scared of progress. We need to move forward
and protect our air, our land, our water, and thus, ourselves.


Like this comment
Posted by Oh, Crap
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 26, 2009 at 5:55 pm

Web Link


Like this comment
Posted by It IS junk science
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 26, 2009 at 6:38 pm

Hey "i like air"......what are you smoking?????????????

Just like all those "other" jobs that did not leave" when the Gov/union started forcing regulations on them.

Whats that sound I hear??? Jobs leaving while your electricity, gas and energy etc bills going up but getting less.

wish I could be a fly on the wall @ your house when the ____hits the fan.

Its people like you who will cry the loudest.

Like I always say: be careful what you pray for....you just might get it!


Like this comment
Posted by Stacey
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on Jun 26, 2009 at 7:18 pm

Stacey is a registered user.

"Junk Science"

That's exactly it. This is just another thing government found to tax, regardless of whether the science is sound or not. Let's ignore evidence that Mars is going through a period of global warming too, believed to be due to the historic low sunspot activity. Let's cherry pick our evidence so that we can influence a populace that doesn't understand science into paying more taxes.


Like this comment
Posted by Stacey
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on Jun 26, 2009 at 7:21 pm

Stacey is a registered user.

But my above comments aren't to suggest that "business as usual" suffices. Didn't Mother teach us to keep our homes clean? Global warming is not a reason to start cleaning up. Only that we shouldn't allow government to burden us with new tax based upon fuzzy-thinking.


Like this comment
Posted by Stacey
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on Jun 26, 2009 at 7:21 pm

Stacey is a registered user.

Global warming is not a reason to start cleaning up. We should be keeping clean already.


Like this comment
Posted by Stacey
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on Jun 28, 2009 at 10:51 am

Stacey is a registered user.

Web Link

"E-mails indicate EPA suppressed report skeptical of global warming"


Like this comment
Posted by Amy
a resident of Downtown
on Jun 28, 2009 at 4:07 pm

Thank you for posting this link about the EPA suppressing info that refutes global warming. I believe this report should be a separate topic on this PW forum. Otherwise this info will likely not be seen.

Also, I believe from most of your postings that you lean liberal, if I am not mistaken. However, I want to commend you for posting this article which supports many conservatives who profess that hard science does not support global warming theories.

Al Gore and his movie, along with the MSM and pseudoscientists and the democrat party are promoting the biggest scam on global citizens. The Cap & Trade Bill must be rejected in the Senate.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

President Trump
By Roz Rogoff | 42 comments | 2,620 views

State budget hinges on earnings of the 1 percent
By Tim Hunt | 3 comments | 627 views

Admitted Early Action? Congratulations! And Next Steps
By Elizabeth LaScala | 1 comment | 252 views