Town Square

Post a New Topic

Parcel Tax still needed?

Original post made by Carl, Country Fair, on May 9, 2009

Quite a few pro-G supporters claim that PUSD is a well managed public entity.

This story contains 228 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (9)

Like this comment
Posted by jay
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 9, 2009 at 11:03 pm

The lesson from this story should be that the district should have a higher reserve. Having a small reserve induces panic when changes, or unknowns, happen at the state level. If we had a higher reserve, being we thought there would be money coming in from the federal government to help us,we actually could have not panicked but rather see what the actual finances would be since the reserve could hold us over if the funding did not come in.

With that being said, the district has wanted a parcel tax so badly for years (who wouldn't want additional discretionary spending money) so they wanted this panic so they could scare the public into passing an additional tax now. It is actions like this that reaffirm why people generally do not trust their own government.


Like this comment
Posted by fact checker
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 10, 2009 at 5:21 pm

Anyone see the channel 5 CBS broadcast this weekend on home prices in Pleasanton. It stated that homes are being overbid because so many people from surrounding areas want to move to Pleasanton. It specifically stated the quality of schools as the most cited reason for moving here. It went on to say that, while other communities have seen their home values fall, Pleasanton has not.


Like this comment
Posted by mo money please
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 10, 2009 at 5:24 pm

People want to move to Pleasanton because we have great schools that do not require an extra payment on your property tax, unlike other districts.


Like this comment
Posted by Carl
a resident of Country Fair
on May 10, 2009 at 7:10 pm

Fact Checker - Do you have any data that supports the outlandish and misleading claims in that video?


Like this comment
Posted by Hmm
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 10, 2009 at 9:45 pm

I am on the Budget Advisory Committee and I must have missed the part of the district receiving $6.7M in new funds from the State let alone $4M more. The $10M in cuts are real and required to balance the budget. I not sure how this translates to greed. Measure G funds will be used to restore programs to benefit students. It’s about the kids and property values. Check out a CBS news story on Pleasanton property values Web Link.


Like this comment
Posted by Russell
a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on May 10, 2009 at 10:08 pm

@Carl

You can use Web Link

to check home prices normalized to square foot, and then look at the year over year change. It is far from perfect, if you take a running average of several consecutive months, you get a better picture. The results for the latest snapshot are below. First number is price decline (year over year per square foot). The second number is foreclosure rate. It is aggregated by zip code.

Pleasanton

-8.6%, 3 per 1000 for 94588
-11.2%, 2 per 1000 for 94566

Dublin

-18.7%, 11 per 1000 for 94568

Livermore

-16.9%, 10 per 1000 for 94550
-22.6%, 20 per 1000 for 94551

Just for grins, here's Antioch

-50.7%, 64 per 1000 for 94509
-40.5%, 75 per 1000 for 94531

These are MDA DataQuick numbers. You can dig in to and do averages for consecutive months, and Pleasanton looks even better.

There are plenty of other sites out there with this kind of information.



Like this comment
Posted by Pleasanton Resident
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 10, 2009 at 10:08 pm

To Hmmmm
Please visit
Web Link
and check the section on breaking news


Like this comment
Posted by Anonymous
a resident of Ruby Hill
on May 14, 2009 at 12:14 pm

Hopefully this will stop the parcel tax from passing. I think PUSD really jumped the gun by putting one on the ballot before all these grants showed up.


Like this comment
Posted by Ptown resident
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 14, 2009 at 12:36 pm

PUSD has been as quiet about the Federal Stimulus money as they can be. They posted info on their website - couldn't avoid it because they were specifically asked to do so and they commented on it at the School Board meeting on Tuesday.

But PUSD sent out an econnect to selected Pleasanton community members about ARRA funds - district employees and PTA leaders.

The chose not to send out a district wide econnect notifying the community about ARRA funds. It doesn't appear that they want Pleasanton voters to know that federal stimulus dollars came in at much higher amounts than they expected, and their arrival means PUSD can choose to not lay off any teachers or cut programs without a parcel tax.

They don't seem to want Pleasanton voters to know that the ARRA funds gives PUSD time to figure out next steps without layoffs, program cuts or a parcel tax.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Does Applying to More Get You Through the Door? Why More Is Not Better in College Admissions
By Elizabeth LaScala | 1 comment | 579 views