Posted by freida, a resident of the Downtown neighborhood, on Apr 24, 2009 at 10:07 am
What's the difference between Bart employees and the bank CEO's?
gimme, gimme, gimme. Bart employee's with their huge salaries and fat benefit packages should, like the rest of us, take a pay cut and be damned glad they have a job. So many people are unemployed and if they do have a job can't afford to get to it. Transportation costs are going up faster than child care and housing. Hey! I'd be happy to take one of those Bart jobs for less money. I can stand and be rude to riders and I could do it without the smug attitude.
Posted by DB, a resident of the Kottinger Ranch neighborhood, on Apr 24, 2009 at 11:42 am
I work at SFO. I know that hundreds of SFO workers take BART to work and many of them have jobs that don't pay alot. These people will be adversely effected by BART charging a surcharge to SFO. I'm sure the fat cats on the board couldn't care less. I for one will be getting back in my car. IT's a shame because I like riding BART, but I will be done, It will no longer be cost effective for me.
Posted by Qwerty, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Apr 25, 2009 at 11:30 am
I'm tired of seeing costs passed onto the individuals instead of the organizations in question controling costs and making cutbacks. Before BART even THINKS about raising fares they should tell us what they are doing to control their budget. Forget BART! I'll drive my Prius and listen to audio books in the car if I have to drive into the city.
Posted by Qwerty, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Apr 25, 2009 at 12:59 pm
Another thing that bothers me about the proposed increases will be the effect it has on people who have NO OTHER CHOICE but to take BART. I'm fortunate in that I have a nice car to drive that gets great gas mileage. What about those that don't have a car? Or who share a car with a spouse/partner and have no alternatives. They are FORCED into paying higher fees, which I think is absolutely unfair.
Posted by AV, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Apr 25, 2009 at 2:49 pm
Wow, lots of interesting points of view.
At first I was going to say that at least BART is dealing with its budget problems by asking those who actually use BART to help solve their budget problems.
But Qwerty has a good point and I'm reminded that I've seen many people exiting the BART station in Pleasanton and either walking home, or taking a bus home. Increased fares will be hard on them, and does seem unfair since they're actually using public transportation and reducing their carbon footprints.
It just seems as if every aspect of the economy has imploded in the last few months.
Posted by Libertarian, a resident of the Castlewood neighborhood, on May 5, 2009 at 1:26 pm
Sell BART (and WHEELS) to a private corporation. Let it make it or break it depending on the market. I never take BART so I don't want my (local, state, and federal) taxes supporting somebody else's transportation welfare. We should all be driving single occupancy autos anyway to stimulate the economy (global warming is an Al Gore hoax, BTW).
This is America! If you can't afford a car, then get a better job so you can! How hard is that to understand?
Posted by Sue, a resident of the Downtown neighborhood, on May 6, 2009 at 11:03 am
They ripped out the carpeting because they could not keep it clean or did not want to routinely clean it and did this to reduce cost. They put down a solid floor covering which they can just wash with soap and water which they also do not do as it also is filthy. You should ask Scott Haggerty our county supervisor or Mr. greed and graft about why it is not into Livermore. Maybe the money was spent to settle some of his sexual harrassment cases out of court.