I received Superintendent Casey’s campaign letter from three PUSD school sites.
Ironically John Casey acknowledged that the first statement in the document was true. That statement is, “It is possible to balance the school’s budget without imposing a parcel tax on Pleasanton homeowners.”
Every one of his rebuttal statements is disputable but no one else will be given the use of the district e-connection communication system to disseminate a response to his statements.
That is exactly why this is illegal campaign activity.
Given Jeb and Crew closed the related thread, I thought I'd open a new one to enable me to comment. In regard to "That is exactly why this is illegal campaign activity" -- That is exactly why we voters should vote NO.
This story contains 150 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.