Town Square

Post a New Topic


Original post made on Aug 4, 2014

Shame on you, Weekly

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, August 1, 2014, 12:00 AM

Comments (7)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sandy Salem
a resident of Del Prado
on Aug 4, 2014 at 4:21 pm

I was also disappointed in the "Drought keeping the pressure on water cutbacks" editorial, especially if there was any backlash that resulted from it.

I hope that people take the time to gather facts before casting aspersions.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by PW
a resident of Mission Park
on Aug 4, 2014 at 4:38 pm

It is very possible to have a green lawn and be far below the 219 gallon per capita usage average for Pleasanton listed by Tim Hunt in his column. Hunt also pointed out that the average per person usage for Livermore is 161 gallons and Dublin is 120 gallon per person average. This is a much better way to look at the problem. .75% of the per person average for Pleasanton is just over 164 gallons a day per person. We have been able to maintain an almost green lawn at a per person average below 150 gallons per day, 32% below the average per person usage in Pleasanton. Should we really expect more from the Pleasanton Weekly other than making assumptions based on one factor - in this case, the color of the lawn.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Damon
a resident of Foothill Knolls
on Aug 4, 2014 at 9:18 pm

I couldn't believe that anyone who calls him or herself a journalist would exercise such poor judgement as to print actual addresses with photos of brown and green lawns while implying that the homeowner with the green lawn was not doing his or her part in complying with drought restrictions. So when I read some of the posts on this subject I was in disbelief. I thought that the posts must be wrong. Nobody at the Pleasanton Weekly could be idiotic enough to print actual addresses with the pictures and the editorial, could they? No one could actually be that STUPID, right? Well, I looked up the print edition in question and discovered that, to my amazement, yes, somebody at the Pleasanton Weekly IS that stupid! Actually, make that two people: The person who wrote the editorial and the editor of the newspaper who gave the OK on the pictures and the editorial. Dunce caps to them both. Make that a double cone-head dunce cap if the writer and the editor are one and the same.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Looky Lou
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Aug 4, 2014 at 9:33 pm

The owner/editor of the newspaper doesn't know the difference between objectivity and playing to demand. The owner/editor censors peoples' posts not based upon any well-defined set of working principles, but rather only based upon one sick poster's repeated "flagging" efforts to get certain messages censored, while owner/editor is so stupid as to think the one complainer represents more than one sick individual.

Why should it surprise anyone when the newspaper commits the obvious moral transgression of revealing home owners' homes and addresses?

The only thing missing at this point is that we haven't yet heard from the owner/editor's loyal attack dogs -- aka bloggers -- who are duty-bound to spring to owner/editor's defense. Yokel rag. Nothing more. At times amusing, but a rag nevertheless.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Small Rations
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Aug 5, 2014 at 1:45 am

According to my brother, Dublin allows 19,200 gallons per month for a single family residence (about 4800 gallons per week). He and his wife have averaged 6500 gallons per month. He said the person he talked with said they have nothing to worry about based on their usage, although common sense requirements apply. That means only watering lawns twice per week and only using a hose with a nozzle that shuts off when released if watering plants, etc... But, interestingly enough, while you can only water lawns twice per week they don't have restrictions on the amount of minutes you can set your sprinkler timer.

The Dublin San Ramon service district allows Dublin residents to track their water usage (monthly, weekly, daily, hourly) on-line. Can we do that in Pleasanton?

 +   Like this comment
Posted by So wrong
a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on Aug 5, 2014 at 9:00 am

Was so surprised to see actual photos AND addresses! If I were the homeowners I would be absolutely furious with PW. Irresponsible journalism and unprofessional. What did you set out to prove by listing addresses?

 +   Like this comment
Posted by HA
a resident of Del Prado
on Aug 7, 2014 at 11:39 pm

That's great people are starting to see what a joke this town is and how the Pleasanton Weakly covers everything up for them.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Baker bill targets BART strikes
By Tim Hunt | 2 comments | 1,309 views

The House of Representatives performs history’s first repeat hara-kiri
By Tom Cushing | 10 comments | 1,161 views

Old Memories and iMemories
By Roz Rogoff | 2 comments | 647 views

Net Neutrality a win or loss for open Internet and First Amendment?
By Gina Channell-Allen | 2 comments | 515 views