Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Jul 25, 2014
The print edition of this opinion piece showed pictures of two addresses: one with a brown lawn and one with a green lawn. Having identified these residences, the article leaves to the reader the conclusion. How grossly unfair! Two points: 1. where does it is it written that a brown lawn is a requirement or that a resident did not meet the 25% reduction because the lawn is still green? 2. The golf course uses recycled water - who is to say the address shown in the print edition did not use water picked up at reclamation plant to water the lawn.
And what was the purpose to list the addresses in the print edition? What was the point? To single out personally someone and slam him unfairly?
Have new hookups been halted due to this 'crisis'? No? Then, how bad can it really be? Not bad enough for our politicians to act on behalf of all of us existing water customers.
I have to agree with Franco regarding the posting and addresses on conditions of lawns. Who knows the conditions regarding both situations. It is indeed disingenuous for the Pleasanton Weekly to post addresses without taking the time to find out the conditions surrounding each case. Regardless, how would either Jeb or Gina feel if their address and picture of their home was posted in any local paper with an implied negative slant?
I also agree with Franco. My lawn is a case in point. We water our small lawn by hand once or twice a week. The lawn remains a bit greener than others in my neighborhood. Although the minimal watering helps a little, it isn't the main reason it stays alive. There are two bigger factors. My house faces east and I have a big tree in the middle of my yard. What that means to my lawn is that when the sun burns the hottest, noon to evening, my yard is completely shaded.
Many of my neighbors, especially those across the street, do not have trees in their yards, or trees planted that can shade their yard, and so get the full effects of the afternoon sun on their lawn.
It looks like the house pictured with the green lawn is also mostly shaded at whatever time the picture was taken. Food for thought.
I logged on to make a comment and read Franco's, Daveg's and Billie's comments. Amen. Yes, my lawn is greener than most for many reasons, some stated in the previous comments. By the way, I have reduce usage by 33% from last year. The Pleasanton Weekly would be looking at a slander law suit from me if that was my address in the article with the green lawn. I think an apology to those residents is in order.
One cannot count on what is published on this blog by certain folks.
i rest my case...
Cholo, truer words were never spoken by you, ever. Thanks for finally outing yourself.
I'm watering 50% less but my lawn is twice as green, probably because my lawn benefits from spilloff water from a nearby golf course. You people must realize that all of this is a hokes. Perpertrated by our Dear Leader and his minions. In LA Story it showed how government can control the spigots to create a false crisis. Here we are with Moonbeam marching in lock step with the global warming alarmists. Makes me want to gag, having this stuff rammed down my throat.
Hokes? Stuff rammed down your throat? You are only posting as 'Right'. Only mittens would advocate for what you are suggesting. (Gagging))
FRANCO is completely correct. Where does the PW get off publishing actual addresses and photos of people's homes? Who appointed them as the water police or gestapo? The City tracks water useage of households and will issue notifications if necessary, not the media, and the editors should be ashamed of themselves and apologize. A green or brown lawn itself is NO indicator of how much water a home is using. The brown lawner could have water wasting toilets and a low efficiency clothes and dishwasher (?) While the green lawner could have efficient fixtures and low water useage so they opt to keep the front turf healthy. Not a bad neighbor policy in my mind. We use 225 g/da which is low, have a very small backyard with mostly pavers, drought-tolerant plants, and we fine-tuned our irrigation to keep the lawn just green enough. Plus being in the shade doesn't hurt either.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
An estate for dog lovers
By Tim Hunt | 0 comments | 1,674 views
What’s in a label?
By Tom Cushing | 8 comments | 221 views
Wiped off the Map!
By Roz Rogoff | 0 comments | 68 views
Home & Real Estate
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
© 2017 Pleasanton Weekly
All rights reserved.