Post a New Topic
Original post made
on May 6, 2014
And this is from the same city council that is approving multiple new housing units. When they are built, will we be restricted to 50% less water?
Could it be that Pleasanton used more water in February, 2014 than 2013 because we did not have any rain.
The rain came later.
Susie had a good point - maybe all new building should be delayed.
Gee with the new multiple units being built and what you use for the public golf course, soon there will not be any water for residents...
First of all 'Potable' water is a bit of a stretch with Zone 7....I don't know anyone who doesn't filter the bejeezus out of it before drinking.
Second, I use very little water, and hope that any surcharges for not reducing will be on a relative scale of some sort. Someone using 10 units a month v. someone using 2 units shouldn't be held to the same standard. Some of us reduce as a general rule, drought or not.
Most of the new apartments are asphalt, concrete and building, almost no grass or trees.
Apartment dwellers using water- absolutely. Normally their is no water meter on each unit so they can take showers all day long if they want to.
To meet this 25% reduction, most residents will have to cut their outdoor watering by 50%. Is the City of Pleasanton going to cut their watering of golf courses, sport parks, and street landscaping by 50%? When in the hell is the City Council going to get with it and water these things with recycled sewage water?
I absolutely agree that no new construction should be permitted until this drought is over, and until the City has purchased the additional water rights needed to support those additional residents.
When is Pleasanton doing to get different water sources than the State water that was cut to zero deliveries this year?
People should show up at this meeting and bitch like hell about the lack of foresight demonstrated by the City Council on water supplies.
Whomever uses water should and must be subject to the same restrictions. Swimming pools included, golf courses included, city parks included, unless it is recycled water.
While mandating a percentage reduction is the easiest way to implement a water savings plan, it is certainly not the fairest way. For example, let's say that the average per capita water use is 100 gallon a day. For a family of four, this would be 400 gallons. Last year family "A" practiced water conservation and cut their water usage to 300 gallons. Family "B", however, was not concerned and actually used 500 gallons a day. Under this new mandatory 25% reduction plan, family "A" will have to cut their usage to 225 gallons a day, while family "A" to 375 gallons. Family "A" will really have to sacrifice, while family "B" will do almost nothing just to get down to the average water usage.
The fairest way is to provide water per capita and let the residents decide how they want to use it. If they want to water their massive water-soaking lawns, let them, but they will not have any left to shower with. Those people who landscape with native plants will have plenty of water for personal use.
This plan is certainly harder to implement, but far fairer.
I agree with Al P. Not all users should be held to the same standard. My family and I already use as little water as we can, conserving as much as possible. I don't think it fair to view me as equal to my neighbor who waters their lawn every afternoon, rain or shine. A 25% reduction would be devastating to us, not to him.
With 2 kids away at college this year, it'll be no problem cutting back 25% or more. Therein, lies the problem with these bureaucrats enforcing the lazy man's guide to a reduction in water use. Obviously, no new water hookups should be allowed and water allocations should be based on how many people live in the house full time. Of course, this would require a little effort and planning, but that would get in the way of all this hand-wringing.
This is why many people don't conserve water on a full time basis...it's times like these were you get doubly punished whee they base your usage on your already prudent use of water in the past.
The way mandatory reductions are meted out is unfair, but it's easier to do it on a percentage basis so that's what happens. It's ALWAYS about taking the easiest way out.
We always practice conservation regardless of the amount of rain and water storage, so mandatory cutbacks really hurt. Added to that, we recently had 2 of our children move back home and the City does not honor a per/person water use schedule or have provisions for changes to the number of people in a household. All the while the water runs freely down the gutter from the City median and landscape overwatering. At least we get to look forward to higher rates when the City doesn't make as much revenue due to the cutbacks!
Until Pleasanton stops watering the golf courses and parks with drinking water they have no right to demand any reduction at all from the rest of us.
Lead by example idiots.
The new development should be restricted to 75% of last years usage. If those pieces of land were using 0 gallons, this year they get 0 x .75 = 0.
The city MUST reduce be at least 25% but you are right it should be more since almost all of the city water usage is outdoor usage. I think a 40% reduction for the city is fair.
If you need to wash your car just drive down hop yard when then center divider strip has their sprinklers on, plenty of water shooting out all over the place!!! Yep, I also see the city as the biggest abuser of wasting water, let's start at the top and quit passing the buck down to the homeowners. Oh yeh get ready for higher water rates, happens every time, usage go down, profits go down, spending stays the same, rates go up.
We moved into a house without rear landscaping, and we were going to landscape this year. Can we write to the water agency to point this out for an exception? Otherwise anyone who installs landscaping will be penalized.
I strongly recommend a rock garden.
Pool covers are good. Just get the cheapest and lightest bubble wrap offered on amazon. Heavy blankets don't insulate any better than thin, and are a pain to get in and out. It cut WAY down on my evaporation, and kept my pool nice and warm. Just be sure to toss a bag of shock in every week. The superheated surface water goes through free chlorine FAST.
In what little rain we had last month, I was able to turn off my sprinklers at that time. The city landscaping sprinklers were on full blast while it was raining. Good job.
Your vote really matters. Over many decades we in Pleasanton have elected the politicians who failed to plan the necessary infrastructure (water, roads, etc.) to accommodate existing and expansionary growth--Growth that continues to this day. Based on other Bay Area communities, I see us moving to the Monterey Peninsula model where NO watering of yards is allowed. I will cut back my usage when I see the approval to build new reservoirs, deliver necessary water by rail tanker, or whatever is feasible. We all allowed this mess to come about, now we need to work to fix it.
Vote them out, Please they approved housing on east
Drinkable water from human waste: Web Link
one thing is for sure: no matter abundant rain or not, the district will demand price increases but will never cut their expenditures.
Central planning doesn't work. They should raise the price of water until the usage drops to the required level. The invisible hand of the market will decide where the water will be used and where it will be reduced. Econ 101: Price goes up, demand goes down.
Yes, we know that the market plays no favorites. Same with food, housing and you name it. If the food becomes too expensive, then some poor people can't afford to feed their kids, which is just too bad, you know? And the same with housing. It warms my heart to see the market doing its job with entire families standing on freeway exit ramps.
I never had to take beyond Econ 101, because once you know price goes up demand goes down what else is there to know?
So nice to see our local leftist troll providing relevant commentary on our water control issue. Time for you to get back to the street corner with your sign proclaiming the wonders of socialism and that a fee market society will end the world as we know it. Oh, woe is us......
Last year Pleasanton Water increased our fees twice because they said we were rationing so much they couldn't make any money and they publicly posted it in the Newspaper. Now they have found another reason to increase our fees. What a Joke!! Their moto is "Screw the consumer!" . Thanks for nothing.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: *
- Amador Estates
- Amberwood/Wood Meadows
- Another Pleasanton neighborhood
- Apperson Ridge
- Beratlis Place
- Bonde Ranch
- Bordeaux Estates
- Bridle Creek
- California Reflections
- California Somerset
- Canyon Creek
- Canyon Meadows
- Canyon Oaks
- Carlton Oaks
- Carriage Gardens
- Castlewood Heights
- Charter Oaks
- Civic Square
- Country Fair
- Danbury Park
- Deer Oaks/Twelve Oaks
- Del Prado
- Foothill Farms
- Foothill Knolls
- Foothill Place
- Foxborough Estates
- Golden Eagle
- Grey Eagle Estates
- Hacienda Gardens
- Happy Valley
- Heritage Oaks
- Heritage Valley
- Highland Oaks
- Jensen Tract
- Kolb Ranch Estates
- Kottinger Ranch
- Laguna Oaks
- Laguna Vista
- Las Positas
- Las Positas Garden Homes
- Lemoine Ranch
- Lund Ranch II
- Mariposa Ranch
- Mission Park
- Mohr Park
- Nolan Farms
- Oak Hill
- Oak Tree Acres
- Old Towne
- Pheasant Ridge
- Pleasanton Heights
- Pleasanton Meadows
- Pleasanton Valley
- Pleasanton Village
- Remen Tract
- Ridgeview Commons
- Ruby Hill
- Southeast Pleasanton
- Spotorno Ranch
- Stoneridge Orchards
- Stoneridge Park
- Sycamore Heights
- Sycamore Place
- The Knolls
- Val Vista
- Valley Trails
- Vineyard Avenue
- Vineyard Hills
- Vintage Hills Elementary School
- Walnut Hills
- West of Foothill
- Willow West
- Alisal Elementary School
- Amador Valley High School
- Donlon Elementary School
- Fairlands Elementary School
- Foothill High School
- Hart Middle School
- Harvest Park Middle School
- Horizon High School
- Lydiksen Elementary School
- Mohr Elementary School
- Pleasanton Middle School
- Valley View Elementary School
- Village High School
- Vintage Hills Elementary School
- Walnut Grove Elementary School
- another community
- San Ramon
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Martin Litton, force of nature. An appreciation.
By Tom Cushing | 2 comments | 959 views
What to do with your buckets of water
By Tim Hunt | 2 comments | 625 views
Chanukah & The Bill of Rights
By Roz Rogoff | 0 comments | 457 views
How Many Colleges Should I Apply To?
By Elizabeth LaScala | 0 comments | 145 views
Home & Real Estate
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
San Ramon Express
© 2014 Pleasanton Weekly
All rights reserved.