Town Square

Post a New Topic

School board looks at locations for new elementaries

Original post made on Jan 30, 2014

With the need for two new elementary schools and hundreds of millions of dollars in repairs to existing facilities, the Pleasanton school board is once again talking about a bond measure.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, January 30, 2014, 7:37 AM

Comments (20)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Upcoming Kindergartener
a resident of Downtown
on Jan 30, 2014 at 11:23 am

This story mentions that within PUSD, First Grade will have a "continued" ratio of 25:1, and that the goal is to extend this up through the grades. However, it does not mention the current ratio for kindergarten. Does anyone know what the current ratio is in Kindergarten for PUSD, or what the anticipated ratio is for next year?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jill Buck
a resident of Del Prado
on Jan 31, 2014 at 8:20 am

Years ago, I had the privilege of talking with Dr. Rice who was the Superintendent who shepherded the Measure D bond that made Pleasanton school facilities what they are today. His strategy for involving the City, Rotary, the Chamber, and parent groups was brilliant, solid, and tremendously effective. A roadmap for bringing the community together around this issue exists, and I would love to see this approach applied once more.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jill Buck
a resident of Del Prado
on Jan 31, 2014 at 8:23 am

It was Dr. James - Lori Rice's dad. :)


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Reduce Class Sizes
a resident of Birdland
on Jan 31, 2014 at 12:19 pm

Kindergarten currently has a 30:1 ratio. First grade is currently the only grade with "class size reduction".


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Bond measure? Yeah, that's the ticket!
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Feb 1, 2014 at 5:25 am

No one will vote for another Bond Measure. PUSD owes $68.3 million in principal alone for bonds from Measure A/B. PUSD also owes $25.6 million principal and interest to pay back certificates of participation loans.

Plus they have Ahmadi+Cazares. No one will vote for anything until they resign or are fired and are long gone.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger
a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on Feb 1, 2014 at 10:44 am

Kathleen Ruegsegger is a registered user.

"The district has also floated the idea that the developers of homes in the East Pleasanton Specific Plan set aside land, and possibly build a school in the area." Because this worked so well with Signature?

". . . moving the district offices to somewhere in the Hacienda Business Park and selling the land that houses the district's administrative offices, a maintenance facility, Village High School and an adjacent ball field." This has been on the table before, but at least part of the Bernal site makes it a difficult property and the cost to build new facilities in Hacienda are likely far more than you would get for Bernal.

"pointing out that Pleasanton would need to be involved in infrastructure, such as roads," If I remember, the City was great in giving us the bill for infrastructure to the tune of $4 million for straightening Vineyard already. Why swap that land and pay another bill for infrastructure?

As to Leadership Pleasanton, "Bowser said the program could be viewed as an advertisement for the school district." It's a public school district; why would it need to advertise? There are many ways, already ongoing, to work with the City and business community. I think Hintzke's suggestion makes the most sense.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Schools
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Feb 1, 2014 at 3:11 pm

I do not see any mention about Middle & High Schools? They are already over crowded, and with plans to add over 3000 new housing units in Pleasanton, is the assumption there will be no impact to these schools?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jake
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Feb 1, 2014 at 8:36 pm

"It's a public school district; why would it need to advertise?"

Are you crazy? Public entities need to advertise, just like private entities. That's the whole idea. Public entities need to be run like business. Business advertise. Public school districts advertise.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger
a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on Feb 1, 2014 at 9:03 pm

Kathleen Ruegsegger is a registered user.

Maybe you can explain. We have a district that is impacted by growth, that is talking about bonds to build capacity to house that growth. What is it we need to advertise for--to attract more students? Families already find us by reputation and sites like greatschools.org


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jack
a resident of Downtown
on Feb 2, 2014 at 10:09 am

I find it hard to take PUSD seriously after following the Neal School situation:
PUSD gets a site on Vineyard Ave. Signature Properties agrees to build a school on the site. All the homes in Ruby Hill provide huge fees in the name of building the school. PUSD never gives Signature the "go ahead" to build the school. Instead they sue Signature. They lose the suits. The people of Ruby Hill never get their school. Their kids are doing just fine at Valley View and Vintage Hills. Where did the money go? (Probably north of 20 million) And now that PUSD is "exploring new sites," they will sell off the Neal site to some home builder, and pocket the money. Where will that money go? It is a total Double Dip. They collect fees and land sites in the name of building new schools, but then never build the schools?
You can shear a sheep a hundred times… You can skin him once...


 +   Like this comment
Posted by local
a resident of Birdland
on Feb 2, 2014 at 10:44 am

Is Bowser nuts? Advertising our school district? Our school district complains already that we do not receive an adequate amount of funding per student to run the programs we want. That is why they tried for a parcel tax, twice. If we really do not receive enough from the state for our operations, like the district administration says, adding more students make the problem worse! Think of it this way, if it costs you $2 to produce a widget and you get paid $1 for it, making more widgets gets you further in the hole. It is obvious there is a basic misunderstanding of math at our administration/board level. Even our forth grade students could figure out this math problem.

The district has already squandered the money it has received from the taxpayers. We have two bonds we are still paying for. They were refinanced so we will be paying for them longer that we should have. They also did an illegal cash-out, at the taxpayer expense, and have squandered that money. They took out COPs (Certificates of Deposits), another loan type, to build things like the daycare center on the district property and to build projects they did not have money for but a COP was easier than a bond since it does not require voter approval. The COP interest for the last many years is being paid for by the developers fees which are supposed to go towards the new facilities needed for new development.

It is time to take our district back and restore it to the prestige it once was. We need to remove much of the school board that is in place as well as the top administration. It saddens me to see how this current administration has ruined one of the best things in Pleasanton.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by local
a resident of Birdland
on Feb 2, 2014 at 10:46 am

Jack, don't forget that the district had an option on the east side, Ponderosa Plan, but they made a deal with the developer to eliminate the option on that land for a cash payout to the district. That money was squandered and we no longer have that land. How can we trust the school district to spend any more of our money. It is like giving a drunk more alcohol.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jake
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Feb 2, 2014 at 2:06 pm

"What is it we need to advertise for--to attract more students? Families already find us by reputation and sites like greatschools.org"

What is the need? Why stop at "great" when we can be extra-great or super-great. We need to run the schools like a business. Of course we need to advertise.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger
a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on Feb 2, 2014 at 2:16 pm

Kathleen Ruegsegger is a registered user.

Cute, "Jake." We can send you the bill, for the promotion and facilities and staff.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jake
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Feb 2, 2014 at 2:57 pm

"Cute"?

The bill will go to me, you, and anyone else who owns a house in Pleasanton. That's "Cute" or something? I think I don't get your humor.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger
a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on Feb 2, 2014 at 4:15 pm

Kathleen Ruegsegger is a registered user.

Gonna disagree with you Jake. No need to advertise. It would be money wasted; better spent in the classroom.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Advertise
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Feb 3, 2014 at 2:22 pm

The only advertising should be for a new Superintendent...


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Cholo
a resident of Livermore
on Feb 3, 2014 at 3:21 pm

Can we all get along...there'S clearly no need to trash the sup...she's supposed to be doing a fine job...or so I've heard on BART!

If advertising is part of it what do you say in the add...STAY AWAY?

i'm so tickled by all the conflict...what's a person to believe?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by local
a resident of Birdland
on Feb 3, 2014 at 4:41 pm

Advertising is the first and foremost way to show the community that a parcel tax is not needed and donations to PPIE are not needed as your money would be wasted in advertising instead of programs that help our students. This is a governmental agency and they will be judged on their output. There seem to be quite a few people upset with the current board and administration and the best thing that can be done is to get engaged to replace the board and direct them to make changes in the administration all before you will give them more money.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Cholo
a resident of Livermore
on Feb 3, 2014 at 5:11 pm

If you tax Massage Parlors in the Tri-Valley but mostly in Plutonia you can raise enuf $$$$$ to fund 30 new schools! COOL OR WHAT?



Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

A second half of life exceptionally well lived
By Tim Hunt | 1 comment | 687 views

Vote YES on Measures 45, 46, & 47, NO on 48
By Roz Rogoff | 9 comments | 414 views