Town Square

Post a New Topic

PLEASANTON CITY COUNCIL CANDIDATE PROFILE: Erlene DeMarcus

Original post made on Oct 4, 2012

Erlene DeMarcus is a recognized transportation expert who has spent a career working for the betterment of our community.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, October 8, 2012, 6:56 AM

Comments (24)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by What ever
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Oct 4, 2012 at 7:57 am

Union stooge - be aware


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Dave
a resident of Birdland
on Oct 4, 2012 at 8:20 am

Where do ridiculous statements like What ever's posting come from? Do you have any basis for such statements?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Diane
a resident of Pleasanton Valley
on Oct 4, 2012 at 8:52 am

The council does not add stop signs or lights around town. Is she applying to be a traffic engineer because she has no education or college degree in traffic solutions or civil engineering.

We have a great traffic engineer in Pleasanton named Mike Tasano who does a wonderful job.

Can she negotiate city contracts and make the tough decisions needed to fix our finances? No. The fire and police are supporting her in hopes that she will give them a better contract than the other candidates.

She supports perpetuity taxes for our grandkids, with no clear idea where the money us going. She scares me with her tax and spend policies.

Sorry, there is no way


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Voter
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Oct 4, 2012 at 8:52 am

According to her statement, she is committed to "and more dollars for public safety".

Aren't much of our current budget challgenges because of high police/fire costs?

I don't hear any of the other candidates pushing for more money for fire/police.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Thomas
a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on Oct 4, 2012 at 9:10 am

Not very deep reporting by the PW. They completely skipped the part about how Erlene worked for James Tong, the developer for the Lin Family that lives in Taiwan, during the Oak Grove project in the hills. They both wanted to jam that awful development into Pleasanton. I remember the 50 plus homes up to 12,000 square feet that were going to sit right on our south ridgetops, after they cut them off. Then Tong also wanted to convert our Vintage Hills shopping center to high density housing. The vineyard area has more than its share of apartments and condos.

I voted against Oak Grove and I am going to vote against Erlene D.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by justwondering
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Oct 4, 2012 at 10:53 am

Erlene is the ONLY council candidate listing both Police and Fire endorsements on her web site. I think that's pretty telling about her positions related to issues they'd be interested in. She is also supporting Cheryl for Mayor--again telling about her positions on union issues.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Toss her back
a resident of Bridle Creek
on Oct 4, 2012 at 11:31 am

Look at what a mess BART is in. They can't stay on budget and are continually asking for more taxes to pay their bills. She was on their board 20 years ago, and has done little since.

NO thanks.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by beware of the naysayers
a resident of Birdland
on Oct 4, 2012 at 11:56 am

The people who comment here are consistent, they attack those they disagree with no matter what the article says. DeMarcus brings accomplishments to the table, she wants to improve our quality of life. The ridicule by people with obvious agendas is unwarrented and cruel.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by What ever
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Oct 4, 2012 at 12:31 pm

Yes, I have a very simple agenda here - make it well known who the unions are supporting. I believe it is very important that the public understands this as public union controlled elected politians have demonstrated over and over again that they don't have the internal fortitude to stand up and do what is right for all citizens.

It is quite telling that DeMarcus wants to funnel more money to safety when safetly already commands a huge percentage of our budget and is crowding out other services.

It would be great to have DeMarcus explain the reasons why she believe safety should get more money.

Her "union stooginess" is extremely transparent.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by really?
a resident of Amador Valley High School
on Oct 4, 2012 at 8:44 pm

dear whatever, i hope you never have an emergency which requires a police or fire response. our public safety personnel put their lives on the line everyday despite people like you.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by To: really
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Oct 4, 2012 at 9:14 pm

The days of public safety HERO worship only lives on in your own mind. The days of leveraging your inflated sense of self-worth has led to increasing demands on the general fund and rapidly increasing pension liabilities that will be paid for by my children, for services we can't afford today but are consuming. My kids can't vote but I can, and I'm voting for both responsible government and responsible candidates. If the candidate has a union endorsement attatched to their name they won't get my vote! Just the way I feel.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by What ever
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Oct 4, 2012 at 11:01 pm

Stop fooling yourself with your own BS and trying to use this as justification even more money. Fire and police jobs aren't nearly as dangerous as many of the others in our community. They like to pretend that they are so they can justify high unjustified compensation. Look up the BLS stats if you don't believe me.

DeMarcus was naive to be talked into being the unions' tool for this election. To make one of her election planks to get more money for safety shows how clueless of a tool she is.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Concerned
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Oct 5, 2012 at 8:25 pm

I will vote against anyone that is endorsed by the unions. We have some major negotiations coming up and we should not have anyone on the council with a conflict of interest. The council should be representing the taxpayers and not the unions. This is the reason for the current mess we are in at the city,county,state and federal levels where the legislators are controlled by the unions. The taxpayers have finally woken up.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by ??
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Oct 5, 2012 at 9:57 pm

Not only is Erlene endorsed by police and fire but the union rep for non-safety employees has Erlene's sign in her front yard as well.
And by the way, take a look at the latest campaign finance discloures posted on the City web site today. Not only do you have Erlene supported by the unions but look at how much Tong, his family and his minions donated to Erlene's campaign.

Makes sense though, we'll have massive development from Tong ( think Oak Grove) to pay for increased pay and benefits for the union employees. Brilliant!!!. . .


 +   Like this comment
Posted by L Fran
a resident of Pleasanton Valley
on Oct 11, 2012 at 3:32 pm

Has anyone seen her home off Mohr, what a sight. Small home business owner or not, the mess is in the front driveway. I been a voter here for 25+ years. Looking at it over time, now time for action.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by She has no Integrity
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Oct 15, 2012 at 8:07 am

Amazing that I got a flyer on my door step about Erlene that has the word "Integrity" in capital letters. I know her personally and she has ZERO integrity.

For example, she is taking more than 1/2 of her campaign funding from her past employer and huge developer James Tong's and the Lin Family's rich family coffers. Each time there is a TV forum she says nothing about their relationship! This developer has one goal and that is to put her on the council to approve projects like the multi-story condos in Dublin! Erlene, tell the people the truth! You are bought and paid for by developers.

Then she says she is a transportation expert. NO WAY! She has zero education in transportation, None. She is dangerous, and she lost her re-election campaign to the Bart board because she is an "expert" but the people were not fooled. One term on the Bart board 20 years ago is not an expert.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jim D
a resident of Downtown
on Nov 1, 2012 at 6:21 pm

You people should thank your stars that someone as dedicated as Erlene is willing to serve. She is a true public servant.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Janey
a resident of Danbury Park
on Nov 1, 2012 at 11:30 pm

I don't know all of the background between the 3 candidates, but I will thank my lucky stars when she is safely tucked away from the chance to spend my hard earned tax dollars on rich union contracts in exchange for deep pocket donations to her campaign.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by question?
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Nov 2, 2012 at 9:37 am

Can anyone help me, if Erlene is elected, would she have to recuse herself for all projects that are related to Tong or the Lin family, or any other developer that helped fund her excessive $30,000 donation pile?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Vote NO for Erlene
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Nov 5, 2012 at 6:12 am

Did anyone see the mailer from Erlene showing her sitting on a bulldozer? At least she is honest in her message to flatten the town and start mass construction on thousands of homes for the Lin and Tong families.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Pentin's the ONE !
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Nov 5, 2012 at 6:34 am

It would be funny, if it wasn't so tragic. Karla and Erlene clawing each others eyes out. Easy solution...just vote for Pentin only. Pentin has actually SERVED Pleasanton continuously for two decades. Parks and Rec Commission, President of Rotary (as a Pls small business owner), currently on Planning commission, plus in many other volunteer activities.
He understands everything about Pleasanton.
For me it's Jerry Pentin Council, Jerry Thorne Mayor.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Concerned voter
a resident of Parkside
on Nov 5, 2012 at 5:11 pm

I just got a flier today from Erlene DeMarcus. She is backed by every union in the region. NO WAY!

Our pension bill will rise and my kids will have to pay for it.

Anyone but ERLENE!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Question
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Nov 5, 2012 at 5:15 pm

I thought it was just the Thorne people, but now the Pentin people are acting rude.

What is up with this? Don't you guys get it, Karla has a lot of followers, including me, and you are losing them as the second votes.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by to Question
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Nov 6, 2012 at 2:41 pm

I guess the Pentin people don't care if they are rude and mean - that is their strategy.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Moving to Maine, Maybe
By Roz Rogoff | 3 comments | 875 views

Measure BB could pay to connect Dublin Boulevard to Livermore
By Tim Hunt | 5 comments | 833 views

“…and all I ask of dyin’, is to go naturally” *
By Tom Cushing | 8 comments | 383 views