Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Jul 30, 2012
Hum, the article did not mention that Erlene actually worked (works?) for James Tong/Charter Properties, one of the people trying to get the Oak Grove houses built and suing the city and residents left and right. Having Erlene on the Council will result in a green light for all James Tong's projects. You can be sure that Tong will be a big finance-er of her campaign as if she gets in, Tong can make Pleasanton look like Dublin with all the homes that Tong built in Dublin. You can go through the archive of city minutes of different commission meetings and seeing here speaking with Tong on all his projects (Oak Grove, Vintage Hills Shopping center (when he intentially made the center look bad as he wanted the center removed and replaced with high-density housing)).
To that end, from the May 6, 2004 Pleasanton Housing Commission minutes, in order of speaking:
Erlene Demarcus, 4542 Mohr Ave., Pleasanton, addressed the Commission. Ms. Demarcus spoke in favor of the Vintage Hills project. She supports 100% affordable senior housing and feels the project needs to move forward to be able to get bond financing. Ms. Demarcus stated that the shopping center has been vacant for 15 years and has been unable to attract an "anchor" in that area. This is an infill project and she feels it fits perfectly within the City.
James Tong, Charter Properties, 4690 Chabot Dr., Suite 100, Pleasanton, addressed the Commission. Mr. Tong gave an overview of the "Vintage Hills" proposal. Currently he is proposing a 188-unit senior housing apartment that is 100% affordable. The ratio will be 10% of the units at rents affordable to households at 50% of the Area Median Income (AMI). The other 90% of the units will be at 60% AMI. The project consists of 8,500 sq. ft. of neighborhood-oriented retail space. Mr. Tong stated that currently interest rates are favorable. He urged the Housing Commission to recommend expedited processing to move the project forward. Mr. Tong showed conceptual plans to the Commission.
Oh goodie, another tax, buy a bond, and spend Democrat.
And here's a letter to the editor from DeMarcus to the Pleasanton Weekly supporting the Lin/Tong Oak Grove project and their competing measure to PP:
Opinion - Friday, May 14, 2010
Letter: Voters OK'd Oak Grove as residential
Don't be misled by the reasoning used to support No on D arguments. The facts on the Oak Grove development and its potential impact are readily available and should ease any concerns of any Pleasanton resident. I have lived here almost 40 years and know firsthand that every project is fully vetted before it is approved.
Pleasanton voters approved the General Plan that designated the Oak Grove property as residential. The proposal that we'll uphold on June 8 comes as the result of two years' collaboration between Oak Grove and Pleasanton neighbors. They worked to create a plan Pleasanton would support, a plan that included a reduction of Oak Grove's housing development plans by half and multiplied the benefits Pleasanton will receive. School systems will receive millions, alongside significant sums for traffic improvements and city services.
The ridgelines won't be compromised. Ninety percent of the property will be donated, serving as open park space to protect the ridgelines and permanently prevent further development. Home designs for the mere 51 homes requested must following strict guidelines and receive approval from the city before they are built. The mega-mansions some fear will not be prolific, and our views will not be meaningfully impacted.
We need to remember that our Pleasanton neighborhoods have shared in this entire process. The plan we're voting on is a plan we helped create, and a plan that will benefit Pleasanton tremendously. Vote Yes on D on June 8.
Erlene DeMarcus Former BART Director
I did not know about her connection to the Lin/Tongs, but BART can't manage security officers like Mehserle, they overpay their drivers in the range of $100K a year, they wanted to force BART to Livermore, shall I go on? Save Pleasanton now - send her to Dublin.
Some lady named Jan B is throwing a party for her. I guess they both want Pleasanton to be run like BART, over paid and under served.
I guess that will be her campaign slogan, "I want the City of Pleasanton to be run like BART." She did such a fine job with the union contracts there.
DeMarcus was BART director prior to the Pete Snyder-Zoyd Luce era, so your criticism of recent BART actions means you agree that things were better back when she was helping lead BART?
Not all bonds are created equal, especially 8 years ago. Pleasanton, like everyone else, was drinking the Redevelopment koolaid. When you take Redevelopment money, the state requires that you spend a portion of it building affordable housing. If we have to build more affordable housing, building housing for seniors, where they can downsize, still be independent, and afford to stay in the community they love is the way to go. Housing Setaside Bonds are ok, since the money can't be used for anything else. They just need to offer a local purchase option, so we can benefit from the higher interest rates.
Why is it all of the local Democrat politicians are in bed with unions and developers? Unfortunately the voting public is so ignorant, they can pretty much be out in the open with their graft and corruption. Some people get it, but most people vote for the person who spends the most.
Pleasanton never had a redevelopment agency. What do you mean we took redevelopment money? That's false.
BART has had problems for a long time going back to DeMarcus. DeMarcus era was just as bad as the Pete Snyder-Zoyd Luce era. However my biggest concern is she works for James Tong (convicted on money laundering and other FPPC offences). If you love how BART has been managed and you want Pleasanton to look like Dublin with all of their housing, you will like DeMarcus.
Are you saying Erlene DeMarcus was the person responsible for the work force/low income housing near BART Dublin station that is such a sham they can't even rent it out? Shame on her and a total waste of funds redevelopment or otherwise. And no one wants to put their businesses on the first floor. A total waste of taxpayer money! And the tiny strip of grass was the only couple of square feet that could be called a park. When the Dems suport a candidate they support what she stands for = a BIG waste of money.
As a Jerry Thorne supporter, I'm assuming Cook-Kalio will not be Mayor, but still be on the council. Since I'm voting for Jerry Pentin, I'm puzzled.
I do not want to risk a Cook-Kalio & DeMarcus council and no Pentin ! Gambling is a dangerous strategy. Remember about 8 years ago, the first-time candiate pretender, that screwed up the entire lineup, as they planned, and we're still suffering. What guarantee do I have this isn't a plot to keep somebody off. I'm not for Brown, but she does have a block of followers. Elections don't come with guarantees. Sometimes meddling strategists really botch the outcome.
A Pentin-Demarcus council would be fine, but I'm not willing to risk musical chairs would be as wanted....then we'd be really stuck with major burdens that have not yet been fixed, and I don't think Demarcus with help us with our largest battle.
I liked DeMarcus on BART and she did a great job...BUT, our city has OTHER, different, forever issues that are looming.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Obama's Executive Order on Gun Control
By Roz Rogoff | 7 comments | 793 views
L.A. court decision has San Ramon ties with national implications
By Tim Hunt | 3 comments | 530 views
Colleges You Ought to Know
By Elizabeth LaScala | 0 comments | 440 views
Home & Real Estate
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
© 2016 Pleasanton Weekly
All rights reserved.