Town Square

Post a New Topic

Measure B Perpetual Tax

Original post made by Bill, Another Pleasanton neighborhood, on Jul 26, 2012

In 2000 Alameda County voters approved a 1/2% sales tax to fund transportation related projects. The revenue from this was projected to be 1.4 billion dollars over 20 years.

The 2012 Measure B perpetual tax states that it will generate 7.8 billion dollars over 30 years. Measure B is combination of adding the previous tax of 1/2% and Measure B 1/2%.

So lets say the 2000 measure was taken out to 30 years. Instead of 1.4 billion it would have generated 2.1 billion. Doubling this number gives 4.2 billion.

Where does MTC get that Measure B will generate 7.8 billion dollars, especially when sales receipts have actually fallen?

Comments (7)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Not again
a resident of Pleasanton Valley
on Jul 26, 2012 at 1:16 pm

The current Measure B does not expire until 2022. Web Link

Basically, this is an attempt to double tax the electorate with a permanent tax with no accountability by authorizing a new tax that does not expire ON TOP of the old tax that again does not end until 2022.

Crooks! I'll be voting NO!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by no checks and balances
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jul 26, 2012 at 5:43 pm

Always vote no on a permanent tax.

Taxes we vote on should have expiration dates and the agency can always put back on the ballot to extend and they will pass if the public fees the agency is using the money wisely. If there is no expiration date, even the legislature could not stop this tax (not that they would ever try to stop a revenue stream).

I don't care if they say there is an "independent oversight committee". Those committees are always appointed by the agency so there is really no independent oversight.

Vote No on any permanent tax.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Been There
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jul 26, 2012 at 11:36 pm

I'm in the mode of voting NO on all taxes because I just don't think the tax money is used with care. It seems to be squandered. I'm not a tea-party person...I'm just myself...and I think we need to reel in the heavy spenders in government. So, it's no on this Measure B tax for me too.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Elaine Scagliotti
a resident of Castlewood
on Jul 27, 2012 at 8:43 am

I vote no on any tax without an ending date and NO on anything that goes into the State General Fund.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Dorene Paradiso
a resident of Country Fair
on Jul 27, 2012 at 10:08 am

I agree and say vote NO. We need accountability etc.. They always try to convince or deceive you into believing, that there is accountability. Unfortunately, there is only waste. Besides the government being wasteful; just look at what happened to many non-profits. Tax grants went into them as well.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Taxpayer
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jul 28, 2012 at 12:08 am

It's just another slush fund to fill other gaps that wouldn't be popular if known. So they just call it transportation, which is something working taxpayers usually approve because they can see and always needs repairs or additions. (except you notice we haven't had much of that in a long time.)
Actually, this would be to fill in for public union excesses that take from our services and expenses in other areas. Not that I'm for growing welfare state, since social services for all our new world residents (carefully read residents,not taxpayers) plus our own generational users of free services. but when those 'social services' need trimming, there is such screaming about more money needed, when there is plenty of money already in the money pot, but public unions are sucking it all up and out. Choices have to be made... support the welfare state/public services or public unions. Taxpayers are usually not the ones using public services, welfare, or union services.
I'll be voting NO. However, I do prefer sales taxes over other taxes (not in addition to). Sales tax does gets world 'perm' visitors and the cash under the table crowd...cheaters in the systems, etc. rather than just the usual wage slaves.
But just because it might be easy to 'get more' doesn't mean it's right or justified, with NO up front budget.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Tim H
a resident of Castlewood
on Jul 28, 2012 at 7:22 am

I answer to a higher calling. As such, iAt's all Big Brother as far as I'm concerned.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Martin Litton, force of nature. An appreciation.
By Tom Cushing | 3 comments | 736 views

Where's the wind?
By Roz Rogoff | 2 comments | 732 views

What to do with your buckets of water
By Tim Hunt | 2 comments | 424 views