Case in Point. Posting critical of Pete Stark and his less than honorable dealings was removed from the postings although the posting was factual. When question was raised to Jeb Bing asking for an explanation, he had to admit that there was no valid reason and it was reposted, however so far down the list of postings that nobody would notice.
Case in Point. Letter published in the Pleasanton Weekly was complementary towards Pete Stark; however my letter pointing out the discrepancies in the letter was never published. Requested via e-mail an explanation from Jeb Bing for the apparently selective publishing of letters to the editor. Guess what? No response
This story contains 121 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.