Town Square

Post a New Topic

Just say No to Measure B3

Original post made on May 20, 2012

If you like higher taxes, stay here. You're in the right city, the right county and the right state for paying more, and probably forevermore.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, May 4, 2012, 12:00 AM

Comments (17)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Andrew L. Jones
a resident of Las Positas
on May 20, 2012 at 8:54 pm

I certainly agree Pleasonton Weekly's May 4th opinion piece pointing out the dangers of Proposition B3. A permanent one cent sales tax in perpetuity?! From what planet did the drafters of this open check book Proposition come? Do they really believe that the voters of Alameda County would entrust their elected and appointed officials with billions of new tax dollars without recourse for 20 years, and then another 20 years, and another, and another? Measure B3 does not make officials accountable to the voters and therefore should be decisevly voted down.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Smokescreen
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 20, 2012 at 10:47 pm

As with most of these fees, taxes, measures, the supposed purpose is a covere of smokescreen that is easier to sell. They have lots of money, but often it goes to things voters would not vote for, so money is used for those, telling use money is 'needed' for what we would want. We just have to say no, work out the budget and do some shifting.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Bill
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on May 21, 2012 at 12:33 pm

Still waiting for Cheryl Cook-Kallio to identify which transportation projects were completed 10 years ahead of time.

How about the north bound carpool lane on I680? That is 10 years behind schedule! The MTC and Alameda County Transportation in all their wisdom instead gave us the I680 Express Lane which is a misuse of taxpayer money as well as a failure at mitigating traffic congestion. This 200 million dollar mistake is enough proof not to approve this measure.

At least 2 out of 5 Pleasanton council members can engage in critical thinking.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Travis
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 21, 2012 at 12:45 pm

Any plans to improve 580W to 680? That is one big mess in need of improvement that is way overdue.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Bill
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on May 21, 2012 at 5:49 pm

Travis - there is a flyover planned for 580WB to 680SB as Cheryl Cook-Kallio wrote in her opinion piece. What she failed to mention was that this flyover is only for HOV vehicles.

The whole 580 680 intersection was poorly designed to begin with. It has ranked in the top tier troublespots for Bay Area freeways since it was built in the 1960s.

The new flyover just added insult to injury as all the commuters knew that a i580wb to i680 sb flyover was needed. But Alameda County transportation commission and Caltrans decided that there would be much more traffic headed northbound than southbound. Boy they really screwed that up. Another reason not to vote for this measure. People on these transportation boards and commissions have no clue as to what needs to be done to mitigate traffic congestion.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by hmmm
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 21, 2012 at 8:30 pm

@Bill

Why don't you call Cook-Kallio and ask her instead of cherry picking projects. That's what I do when I have a question of a council member.


Web Link


 +   Like this comment
Posted by local
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 21, 2012 at 10:04 pm

The politicians just want more of our money. They are addicted to OPM (Other People's Money). They collect our taxes, some of the highest sales tax in the state with one of the highest state taxes in the country, and then tell us if we want any of our infrastructure projects completed, we need to pay more. No worthwhile projects were finished 10 years ahead of time. Just another lie from a local politician. If the projects were completed that far ahead of time, they would have saved a ton of money, enough to finish the rest of the projects on the list they want more money for.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Arnold
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 21, 2012 at 10:42 pm

Just say No to Measure B3

If you like higher taxes, stay here. You're in the right city, the right county and the right state for paying more, and probably forevermore.

Pleasanton City Council members Cindy McGovern and Jerry Thorne, voted against the proposed ballot measure last Tuesday. Theirs were gutsy votes that astonished Mayor Jennifer Hosterman, who helped draft the proposal, and Council members Cheryl Cook-Kallio and Matt Sullivan who endorse it.

No surprise here.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by a reader
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 21, 2012 at 10:48 pm

A parcel tax would be a better choice for a new tax. I already voluntarily pay far more than required. But that isn't enough. You need to pay more too.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Arnold
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 21, 2012 at 10:48 pm

I forgot the quotation marks.

"Just say No to Measure B3

If you like higher taxes, stay here. You're in the right city, the right county and the right state for paying more, and probably forevermore."

"Pleasanton City Council members Cindy McGovern and Jerry Thorne, voted against the proposed ballot measure last Tuesday… Theirs were gutsy votes that astonished Mayor Jennifer Hosterman, who helped draft the proposal, and Council members Cheryl Cook-Kallio and Matt Sullivan who endorse it."

No surprise here.

Web Link


 +   Like this comment
Posted by annonymous
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 22, 2012 at 8:53 am

Apparently none of you actually drive on any of the roads in this state or use any transit. . .

BTW 1/2 % tax is a continuation of a tax you already pay. 1/2% is a new tax to fix existing road and to replace infrastructure. Maintenance is cheaper than letting it all fail and then having to replace it.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by a reader
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 22, 2012 at 9:01 am

I will not support this measure until Pleasanton passes a substantial parcel tax. First things first.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by annonymous
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 22, 2012 at 9:24 am

Two different pots of money. . .one city and one county. . .


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Smokescreen
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 22, 2012 at 11:31 am

Travis, it is truly amazing that the 580 - 680 interchange is allowed to exist as it is.
W580 to 680 has accidents every SUNday 3p - 7p. True, they are unfamiliar SUNday drivers, the very worst period (clueless everywhere + unfamiliar with 580-680). Mix BOATS, bigrigs, talking kids, and cheaters who think they'll speed on freeway to last inch and just cut-in when there is no merge left...no matter how congested.
If you listen, you'll here it live almost every Sun 3-7...often deadly.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Bill
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on May 22, 2012 at 12:42 pm

hmmm- why would I want to talk to a person who advocates a perpetual tax? Hopefully Cheryl isn't feeding this hogwash to her Civics students. It would be nice if she supported her statements with facts. Without facts her opinion is her opinion and is not worth a hill of beans.

As far as cherry picking projects - I do not care much about footpaths under freeways or bicycle trails along former railroads, and whether these projects are finished on time or not. What I do care about is not having to worry about my car being damaged driving on an interstate freeway. CalTrans has identified 56 slabs (not little potholes but entire freeway sections) that are in dire need of replacement between Bernal and Sunol exits on SB i680. Large trucks drive on the shoulder rather than risk damage to their undercarriage on lane 3.

How come the politicians can find 200 million dollars to install a worthless Express Toll Lane that is absolutely not needed but cannot find the money for upkeep on a freeway that is essential for commerce? Where is the accountability?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by a reader
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 22, 2012 at 3:16 pm

It may go to different pots of money, but it all comes from my one pot of money -- my tax dollars. Not one penny from me to this measure or any other until we adequately fund Pleasanton schools.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by hmmm
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 22, 2012 at 7:46 pm

@ Bill. . .much more important to spout your opinion and accusations here rather than engage in a dialogue. . .must NOT want the answer to your questions!

I am worried about the perpetual pot holes in Alameda County!


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Prop 46: Two Bridges Too Far
By Tom Cushing | 21 comments | 1,855 views

The valley loses a distinguished and humble leader
By Tim Hunt | 3 comments | 1,282 views

My secret identity is revealed!
By Roz Rogoff | 2 comments | 1,078 views