Post a New Topic
Democratic Party strategists launch ads targeting GOP's Meg Whitman
Original post made
on Mar 1, 2010
A group of California Democratic strategists have launched radio ads charging that Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman is using her personal wealth to avoid traditional campaign scrutiny.
Read the full story here Web Link
posted Monday, March 1, 2010, 6:20 AM
Posted by Don't fire til you see the whites of their eyes
a resident of another community
on Mar 2, 2010 at 10:37 am
Ptown mom, just know we're not opponents. I'm an avid gun advocate, which is why I go under the moniker gunslinger most of the time. I'm an extreme pro-life advocate and especially despise partial birth abortion. I love my country, would fight again for it at a moments notice, if the war was a proper one. Ah, but there's the rub...
The misuse of war is the number one way the traitors, who have infected both parties, can destroy a nation. Look at how war destroyed Europe. Europe had control of 80% of the planet before their nationalism was misused by traitors in their leadership, causing them to fight amongst themselves, destroying themselves and their empires and countrys, until now they and indeed the entire western peoples are now second class citizens in their own countries, invaded by en masse by the very third worlders that were once their colonial subjects.
The Bush administration placed us in a false war. True conservatives like pat Buchanan and Ron Paul know that. There was no reason to oust saddam. He was keeping the lid on the bunch of lunatics in his country. It was a liberal agenda to free the Iraqi people. A conservative would say, "what the heck do I care if Iraq is oppressed? That ain't my problem. As long as they're not making problems for us.". And they weren't. The only one who feared Iraq was Israel, who coincidently provided all the false evidence that Iraq had WMD.
Toruting terrorists and locking them up without well established reason might seem all well and good, and I certainly supported it at first, but you need to understand how quickly that mantra can be turned on everybody. As many a conservative pundit has quoted, "first the government breaks their laws going after those everyone can agree is evil, but then they break their laws going after me." The constitution was created for a reason. There's a reason we have due process. The founding fathers knew that, sure it would be nice to not have due process when it comes to terrorists, which thy had back then, but once you get rid of due process for one person, you set a precedent to go after anyone without due process. Believe me, there are evil ones in our government who would happily throw gun advocates and rightwingers in general in guantanamo bay. That is actually the end game. You might think that's silly, but that's why it works, because many patriots don't see that trick until they themselves are locked up.
Bush and especially McCain fought hard for amnesty, far harder than Obama. Bush and McCain are neocons, a far cry from a conservative. They wanted a north American union, which basically wouldve made Mexico a 51rst state. And with that we wouldve been that much more overwhelmed by third worlders. So why want it? They were preparing for their end game- a war with the European union and Russia, which they wouldve provoked. Recall how anti-Europe Bush was. Recall how anti-Russia McCain was. Look to some of his speeches during the elections, where he talked about war with Russia if they ever did something so evil again as their I vasion of Georgia. Who the he'll were we to get upset at someone invading another country? Georgia had provoked Russia a thousand times more than Iraq provoked us. It was BS. McCain is an Cold Warrior who never let go of the past. He wanted to beat down the pinkos once and for all.
The wrong war is the true destruction of a great civilization. Hitler rose to power claiming he wished to save the white race and bring the Germans to glory. What does he do? He kills more white people than anyone. He kills thirty million Slavic people, many of them Nordic as can be. He get 8 million of his Germans killed, most being the selected nordics he chose as his warriors. He destroyed europe and all European power, the aftermath of WWII being the collapse of all European empires. The aftermath of Hitler was the temporary annihilation of the very people and culture he claimed to want to protect.
All other things are secondary to stopping the wrong war. So yes, Obama has done some things to appease his base, all for the primary goal of preventing the wrong war. But you must understand that there's a difference between actually doing something and pretending you're doing something. For instance, while he may claim to be anti-gun to appease the liberals, has he taken our guns away? Has he overturned the federal ban on partial birth abortion? Has he raised our taxes? No, no and no.
However, he is forcing the public education system to overhaul itself Ina conservtive manner. Do some research on that. And so what if he's taken over GM? It was always kept afloat by the government. It's long been a socialist endeavor in this sense.
Bush and McCain fought harder than anyone for the bailout of the banks and federal reserve. Is that not socialist? Too big to fail? Please. Meanwhile obama is putting the banks in their place, making them fight for whatever money they receive from the government and attaching restrictions that makes them quickly pay the money back. The monetary system should not be entirely private. It produces nothing. It does nothing but cause problems, especially the Federal Reserve, which is the den of evil ones who rule the world. But that's another discussion
No which leaders to trust. The evil ones are smarter than to wear their intentions on their sleeves, and to choose one party to infect so that everyone knows which is the evil party. Both parties are infected. Both parties have good people.
Lou Dobbs was a true conservative, which is why he was cancelled. The rulers ofthe world tried to supplant Beck for Dobbs. Why? Because Beck is a neocon. He's a corporatist, a warmonger, and many other nonconservative things. He touches on key issues like the Fed and illegal immigration only enough to bait true conservatives into thinking he's legit. But he's not. It's patently obvious that he's a corporatist, always bringing on the center for consumer freedom, which is a euphemism for corporate oligarchy. Remember, it's the corporate oligarchs who fight harder than anyone for illegal immigration, whih is why Bush and McCain were both for amnesty. And they all fight hard for a war with Iran, which serves no one but Israel. Iran is no threat to our country. They will never be. If you would like me to elaborate on that I will.