Town Square

Post a New Topic

Government Service Union (SEIU) wants more of your money

Original post made by mk, Birdland, on Jun 10, 2009

SEIU drops a mil for new taxes campaign.

The California State Council of Service Employees International Union launched a $1 million statewide advertising blitz today with a television commercial calling for new taxes to help balance the state budget.

Some of the text from their ad:
"In Sacramento ... a budget crisis. To solve it, we need balance ... cooperation ... common sense. The politicians propose cuts that hit families ... with no sacrifice from the special interests. "

SEIU is one of the largest special interests in the State. They just want more of your tax money to protect their pensions. What is interesting is they have a lot of money to burn. $1M on this campaign alone.

Comments (22)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Burn baby Burn
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 10, 2009 at 3:04 pm

I hope the SEIU keeps dropping their cash until they are out of it. We'll keep voting down their taxes.

Keep it up, SEIU, we'll keep using it in our tax coffers for education.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by More Taxes Please...
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 10, 2009 at 4:31 pm

We need to raise the taxes for individuals and families that make more than $100,000 per year. That would help our politicians balance the budget and fund the necessary programs for the majority of Californians.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Freddie
a resident of Danbury Park
on Jun 10, 2009 at 4:35 pm

More taxes please, great idea if you are making less than 100K how about taking 30% of what everyone makes regardless of the amount?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by More Taxes Please...
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 10, 2009 at 4:35 pm

In addition, we need a wealth tax to tax people who have $1M or more in assets. Luxury tax should also be applied to all vehicles > $25K and homes > $1M. We need the wealthy folks to start funding essential programs in this great state.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by More Taxes Please...
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 10, 2009 at 4:38 pm

Freddie - we need to reduce the tax burden for those making $100K. People who make less than $100K are more likely to spend their money and help our economy. We should reduce the tax burden for these folks while raise the taxes for the wealthy to bridge the gap.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by What?
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 10, 2009 at 4:46 pm

Yo More Taxes Please...

Your theft by tax premise got us into the mess we're already in. You voted in tax policies, ran up the bill, the people with money bailed CA, and now we're stuck without revenue.

How's that working for us?

Next you'll say that we should handcuff people to the state so that no matter what we do, if they are rich, they can't leave.

Call it what you want, but until you and others like you figure out that you can't keep stealing from productive members of society to give to more people that aren't productive and won't get productive, the same problem remains.

You can either, cut programs, cut taxes, or take a hike. You pick.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by mk
a resident of Birdland
on Jun 10, 2009 at 4:58 pm

The reason we are in the current situation is a majority of the tax income comes from the "wealthy" and they did not make money in this economy, so the state receives less in taxes.

We need a fair tax system that taxes EVERYBODY. A wealthy person is not using the government services anymore than somebody who is not wealthy (probably the opposite). EVERYBODY needs to pay so the government can provide us the services that government is supposed to (safety, infrastructure, education).

Personally I think the legislature should automatically be paying the highest tax bracket, no matter how much they make. That might make them think twice by taxing the "wealthy".


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Freddie
a resident of Danbury Park
on Jun 10, 2009 at 5:31 pm

More taxes please,

I am speechless.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Pleasanton resident
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 10, 2009 at 6:49 pm

I call sarcasm. Along similar lines, we need to confiscate the homes and assets of Hollywood fat cats to help balance our budget. After all, we all know they flit around on private jets and hide their wealth in tax havens...Californians deserve better!!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by stupid is as stupid does
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 10, 2009 at 6:52 pm

Lets just hate the people who make more than 100,000.....and while we are at it, lets stone them too. We could post their name on this forum, along with the car they drive etc. Damn rich people.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Big Poppa
a resident of Del Prado
on Jun 10, 2009 at 7:39 pm

It's the high income taxpayers who alredy pay for all of the hand outs CA is giving. We need to deprot ALL Illegals immediately as they cost the State anywhere between 5 to 15 billion dollars. It may seem mean but that's life.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Frank Lee
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 10, 2009 at 7:49 pm

Big Poppa, I hear ya but it'll never happen. Loons won't be happy 'till our quality of life is truly 3rd World-like.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by More Taxes Please...
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 10, 2009 at 8:55 pm

Illegals are not as much of a problem as the wealthy who hide their money in tax havens and their offshore accounts. The state needs to crack down on these tax cheats.

Raising the taxes for people who make $100K or more will bridge the budget gap. People who make that much won't even feel a pinch and funding would be available to help the needy. Everyone win.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Freddie
a resident of Country Fair
on Jun 10, 2009 at 9:13 pm

More taxes please,

The budget deficit is now 21.4 billion and is growing each week. California has 50 days to fix it or doomsday by the state treasurers estimate today. Not enough money to tax. What would you do? tick tock the clock is ticking Cinderella


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Frank Lee
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 10, 2009 at 9:47 pm

How about this: Illegals AND tax cheats are BOTH a huge problem. And guess what, we have a lot more problems. Hint -- we can't spend more than we bring in. ;)

Here's a list of tax cheats in California, well over $100,000,000 at stake. Web Link


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Me Too
a resident of Canyon Creek
on Jun 10, 2009 at 10:07 pm

We need to drop income tax and have a national sales tax. A national sales tax of 15% would currently match or exceed income tax. The more you spend, the more you pay.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Me Too
a resident of Canyon Creek
on Jun 10, 2009 at 10:14 pm

Frank Lee - thatnks for the link - this list should be made much more public. As many of those are the list are businesses, I would definitely not visit those establishments and I hope other would would concur. While most are in SoCal, there are few out this way including a Top 20 in San Ramon (Wells Interior) - so please avoid this company (if they are still around)


 +   Like this comment
Posted by mk
a resident of Birdland
on Jun 10, 2009 at 10:23 pm

To More Taxes Please, you are invited to send in all your money. Donations to the government are accepted.

One of our biggest problems is there are legislatures that feel we can fix every problem. We can't! We have to cut back on expenses including programs. Yes, when you cut a program somebody will be affected. But remember there were times when we did not have all of these programs. Even if everybody gave 100% of their income to the government, the legislatures would say they need more money to help people in need. This is just like a budget you do at home. You look at your income and you plan your expenses accordingly. You can't do everything you want so you have to prioritize.

In addition to all these programs we can't afford, many/most cost too much the way they are structured now; especially because of the powerful employee unions. If the unions will not renegotiate, our best bet will be for bankruptcy, just like the auto companies. We could then have a judge undo these unfair labor contracts. As "unfair" I mean the government employees have benefits that WAY exceed those in the private sector (and paid by the taxpayer).


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 11, 2009 at 12:34 pm

Why don't they donate that million dollar? It's not much, but it's a start, and maybe they have more to give. Unions must end, that is the only solution to all this budget crisis.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Informed
a resident of Downtown
on Jun 11, 2009 at 11:07 pm

Okay, so what would you cut? Cal Grants, State Parks, Healthy Families, education, UC/CSU, hiv/aids funding, police, fire, funding for local governments? All of these are part of the Governor's proposals.

$24 billion (the current deficit) is 26% of the general fund. Can we cut our way out of the problem? Think you have all the answers? Take the budget challenge at www.nextten.org
You will find it is not that easy!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Frank Lee
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 12, 2009 at 12:14 am

Informed, here are my cuts to what you asked:

Cal Grants- cut 50%
State Parks- Close 25% of parks for the next two years.
Healthy Families- cut 25%
education- cut 5%
UC/CSU- raise fees approx. 10% - just done.
hiv/aids funding- cut 25%
police- cut administration 50%, elimniate 3 point retirement system.
fire- same as police, above.
funding for local governments- cut 10% but make strong law to never allow state to raid local revenues ever again.

/////////////

Informed, I just took the challenge. My goal was to reduce taxes and reduce government mandates and regulations (green house gas mandates, for example) in order to attract business formation and expansion and protect current businesses from panicking and either reducing labor and labor costs, leaving the state or going out of business. Using my plan, I was not able to balance the budget (I ran a $21b deficit). The problem with the challenge was that it did not calculate the positive impact of my collective strategy. Examples internationally and in much lower taxed other states bares great evidence that my strategy will re-ignite the California economic engine and wipe out the deficit in a few years. The challenge is biased to have participants want to reflexively increase taxes. Fascinating and frightening!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by 12.9B
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 12, 2009 at 12:24 am

Informed,

I also took the challenge and I got us down to 12.9B. I cut every expense I could. I couldn't get it any lower because I ran out of options. The problem with your site is the options are too limited. I would've cut more and had a surplus.

We basically need public services for those that cannot care for themselves or need to be kept away from society. There are so many options to get rid of it is ridiculous.

I would LOVE to cut away that budget's expenses and slash the taxes at the same time. Oh, to dream!

I'm off to bed now and I am certain to have sweet sweet dreams!!

Thanks for that fun!


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

CIA’s Five Stages of Woe
By Tom Cushing | 32 comments | 1,635 views

Where's the wind?
By Roz Rogoff | 2 comments | 684 views