Continued -- "Dirty Politics in a Community of Character"
Original post made by Another Gatetree Resident, Pleasanton Valley, on Apr 3, 2009
djohns is a member (registered user) of Pleasanton Weekly
I received Superintendent Casey's campaign letter from three PUSD school sites.
Ironically John Casey acknowledged that the first statement in the document was true. That statement is, "It is possible to balance the school's budget without imposing a parcel tax on Pleasanton homeowners."
Every one of his rebuttal statements is disputable but no one else will be given the use of the district e-connection communication system to disseminate a response to his statements.
That is exactly why this is illegal campaign activity.
Given Jeb and Crew closed the related thread, I thought I'd open a new one to enable me to comment. In regard to "That is exactly why this is illegal campaign activity" -- That is exactly why we voters should vote NO.
Good news for downtown Livermore and the performing arts
By Tim Hunt | 3 comments | 1,075 views
November Ballot Prop 2 – Devils or Angels in the Details?
By Tom Cushing | 2 comments | 983 views