Town Square

Post a New Topic

Election: Grant, Arkin, Hintzke win school board seats

Original post made on Nov 7, 2008

Chris Grant, Valerie Arkin and Jamie Yee Hintzke were elected to the Pleasanton school board Tuesday in what was the first time in years that three seats--or a majority on the five-member board--were up for grabs.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, November 7, 2008, 12:00 AM

Comments (12)

Posted by Beware of Stephen Page, a resident of Mission Park
on Nov 7, 2008 at 3:15 pm

This article states, "Commenting on the Pleasanton Weekly's website, [Stephen Page] said he didn't seek or accept money because he 'wanted to test the idea that a person could run on the value of his ideas, merit, dedication to citizen-service, and the value of one's experiences.'"

This sounds so noble, and the Weekly reporter is being kind to Page, because in other comments made by Page on November 5 on the Weekly's website (in response to the earlier online version of this article), he lists a series of "Corrupted Process Lessons" that chastize our school board and the Weekly itself for censoring him. He claims that government and the election process and ALL news organizations are corrupt. He writes:

"The election **process** at the local level of government in Pleasanton has been broken or corrupted for quite some time...."

"For the news organizations (all of them) to censor and mislabel a candidate as they have, censoring accurate information for their own purposes, it is simply an example of a fundamental corruption of government that any American citizen could imagine."

Page goes on a ramPAGE with a lenthy diatribe of sour grapes and paranoia to preach these Corrupted Process Lessons to readers.

You've got to click over to read this stuff. It's a powerful lesson that as voters we should ALWAYS do our homework before voting.

Thank goodness he wasn't elected.

Posted by Beware of Hintzke, a resident of Canyon Meadows
on Nov 7, 2008 at 9:43 pm

don't know about Page but i am SO SORRY Hintzke won a school board seat. I was going to vote for her until I saw her holding a NO on 8 sign at farmers mkt. You are right, we need to do our homework on all the candidates.

Posted by Karen, a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on Nov 8, 2008 at 8:39 am

Well I am glad Valerie Arkin Won! She is smart, well educated, articulate and a big volunteer in the school system. She does not work outside the home -other than volunteering, so she has the time to made a significant contribution the school board! Go Valerie. BTW, she was not recommended by the PW either, so I would not expect to see much written in support of her by the editors.

Posted by molly, a resident of Carlton Oaks
on Nov 8, 2008 at 2:32 pm

(Comment deemed inappropriate by Pleasanton Weekly Online staff)

Posted by Hintzke on Prop 8, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Nov 8, 2008 at 5:40 pm

Good to hear Hintzke supported Prop 8. We need leaders in our community who believe in equal rights for all: The same idea promoted in the Declaration of Independence--that all are created equal.

BTW, just because the Weekly didn't endorse Arkin desn't mean they don't like her. They just picked the top three in their opinion.

Posted by Louie, a resident of Walnut Grove Elementary School
on Nov 9, 2008 at 7:37 pm

Supporters of Prop 8 do indeed believe in equal rights for all. To color them otherwise is an easy way for you smear those who have an opposing view. Marriage is NOT a right no matter how many times you want to suggest otherwise. It is apparent looking at the data re: who supported prop 8, that the blacks did indeed voted YES on 8. I certainly think they can discern a "right". End of discussion. Never knew Hintzke was a "No on 8. " If I did, here is one vote she would of NOT gotten.....I have no desire to be led down the path she obviously wants to take this community and this state. But I will not color her less than those who supported prop 8. However, if given the opportunity, I will validate her position on social issues of the family.

Posted by Anonymous, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Nov 10, 2008 at 10:00 am

I did not vote for Hintzke, but I am glad to hear she is a "no on 8" person... I will be more inclined to support her in the future

Posted by Anonymous, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Nov 10, 2008 at 10:03 am

I did not vote for Hintzke, but I am glad to hear she is a "no on 8" person... I will be more inclined to support her in the future

That being said, I think it is a bad idea for people running for local positions to get involved in national politics. I was not sure who to vote for when it came to mayor, but after seeing house after house with Brozosky's signs next to McCain's, the choice was clear for me, and I voted for Hosterman. Seeing Brozosky's signs next to McCain's made me look closely at his record, and I did not like what I found, just like I did not like what I found out when it came to Palin.

Posted by Anonymous makes me LOL, a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on Nov 11, 2008 at 5:55 pm

Below are quotes from Anonymous.

"I think it is a bad idea for people running for local positions to get involved in national politics"

"I was not sure who to vote for when it came to mayor, but after seeing house after house with Brozosky's signs next to McCain's, the choice was clear for me, and I voted for Hosterman." local politicians should not get involved in local politics but I the voter will draw my conclusions who to vote for locally by seeing whose local sign is next the national sign.

Pleazzzzze tell me we have more thinking going on in our voting booths then this person demonstrates

This is a CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF "DO AS I SAY NOT AS I DO" if I ever saw one.

Posted by chico, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Nov 14, 2008 at 12:40 pm

regarding Hintzke, i'm disappointed she won a seat on the school board, regardless of her opinion on prop 8. i talked with her at length at the farmers market before the election. i asked her what was the first thing she would change if she was elected. she himmed and hawed, but couldn't answer that simple question. then i thought, maybe she doesn't think anything needs changing so i asked what she would spend her time and energy on if elected. she answered that question but to be honest, i couldn't understand what she said other than do the things that moves pleasanton from number 8 to number 5. then we talked about how i could tell if she was doing a good job if and when she got elected and she mentioned test scores at the two high schools. i reminded her that there are four high schools in pleasanton (foothill, amador, village and horizon). ;-)

then one of her cohorts started talking more about test scores, graduation rates, percentages of kids moving on to college and how the school my kids attend was an inferior school. i live in pleasanton and obviously pay property taxes to support the public schools and i volunteer in the public schools as well so i do have an interest in the performance of the schools, but i choose to send my kids to a private school. then the cohort went on to say how awful the school my kids attend was and i needed to remove them and Hintzke said nothing. even when i reminded her that the test scores and college attendance rates (the same stats she used previously for measurements of school quality) for the school my kids attend is higher than pleasanton public schools, Hintzke still had no response.

maybe she's not a good debater? maybe she's not good with constructive conflict and disagreement? still, she was elected and i hope and pray she does well to improve the schools for all the kids in pleasanton.

Posted by Public vs Private, a resident of Downtown
on Nov 14, 2008 at 1:02 pm


A couple of thoughts for you. Private School is not close to a guarantee your student will get a better education. In fact due to its private nature, private schools can hire non credentialed or accredited teachers wheras a public school can't. Additionally, Marketing folks are great with statistical manipulation to make their desired points. As a % I do believe that more private school kids do get into colleges, but not for the reasons some might believe. A lot has to do with entrance agreements, relationships etc.... I do not believe you can find any survey or documentation that prove private school kids arrive to college any more prepared for life as a college student than public school kids.

Regarding your hopes and prayers for Pleasanton Schools. Test scores have unfortuately become too much of a focus regarding success of any school. Statistics tell you little about the total makeup of any person. Some kids are great test takers and some panic under pressure. Having gone through the college entrance process twice now I can tell you from admitting Universities, that Amador Valley and Foothill are both VERY highly regarded. The bar is already set VERY high.

Posted by chico, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Nov 14, 2008 at 2:23 pm

hi public vs. private,

i agree that there are no guarantees about a better education at a private school than at a public school. i never said that a better education could be had from a private school. i said using the same measurements presented to me didn't justify the bashing from the Hintzke supporter and Hintzke's non-response. that's where my vote for Hintzke was lost.

it's a choice to send our kids to a private school, just like those of us that bought homes or moved to pleasanton so they could send their kids to the highly regarded pleasanton schools. and it's true, statistics can be bent many ways to see what you want to see. and as for entrance agreements between private schools and colleges, i am ignorant of that. i hope it's not true, but i fear there may be some truth to what you're saying. i want my kids to be rewarded based upon their talents, abilities, commitment, dedication and character, and not based upon what what i could afford to buy them.

it's important for our community that all children have the best education experience possible in pleasanton; not just the ones with the high test scores, but also those struggling. we need to prepare our children for the world they will live in. to do less is a disservice to them and our community. we need to live up to the saying of a Community of Character, not a community of characters.

and hey, i'm not so blind to know that in this economy, i'm just a pink slip away from my kids attending the great public schools of pleasanton.

If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Preserving Disorder
By Tom Cushing | 73 comments | 2,067 views

The drought drives lawmakers to action
By Tim Hunt | 12 comments | 1,435 views

CPRA: Balancing privacy, public's right to know
By Gina Channell-Allen | 3 comments | 187 views