Pleasanton Weekly

Real Estate - May 14, 2010

NAR wants wind damage covered in reform of flood insurance program

Changes could benefit homeowners here who sometimes sustain damage

by Jeb Bing

The National Flood Insurance Program has been effective at reducing costs to property owners and saving taxpayers money, but since 2005 floods and damages have pointed toward a need to reform the program, an executive of the National Association of Realtors told a Congressional subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity this week.

His comments came before heavy rain and a swollen river flooded parts of Nashville.

"As the leading advocate for private property rights, NAR calls upon Congress to make the NFIP stronger and more efficient so that it can better protect the nation's property owners," said NAR First Vice President Maurice "Moe" Veissi.

Veissi, a Realtor for more than 40 years and broker-owner of Veissi & Associates Inc. and TM Realty, located in Miami and Daytona, Fla., said that Congress initially should reform how it renews the program by adopting minimum five-year NFIP reauthorizations.

"Extending the NFIP month-to-month through stop-gap measures--some might say 'punting' from one deadline to another--is an inefficient way to operate a major federal program," he said. "And it creates financial and real estate market uncertainty for millions of taxpayers, financial market lenders, and insurers who can't, or won't, operate under these uncertainties. Such an extension provides much-needed certainty to a recovering real estate market and to millions of taxpayers who depend on this important program."

NAR also called for reforms that would strengthen the program's financial footing. "Increasing community participation would lead to increased funds for the NFIP, help property owners recover from flood losses, and decrease future federal assistance when uninsured and under-insured properties flood and owners experience losses," he said.

"Properties facing identical risk should have an identical rate," Veissi said. "The rate should not be based directly or indirectly on the type of occupancy or the income or assets of the owner. That would mean two properties could be located next to each other, but the commercial property could get a bill that's four times more, and that's not right."

Discounted insurance rates should be eliminated for older properties with a history of repeated payouts where an owner has refused to mitigate against future insured losses.

NAR also supports H.R. 1264, the Multiple Peril Insurance Act by Rep. Gene Taylor, D-Miss., that would expand NFIP to include wind coverage. That would further reduce post-disaster assistance for which taxpayers pay while paying for itself, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

"Covering both wind and flood would also eliminate the pushback we've seen from insurers about whether damage was caused by wind or flood," said Veissi.

He told the congressional panel that NAR stands ready to work with members of the committee to develop meaningful reforms to the NFIP that will help protect this country's property owners and renters prepare for and recover from future losses resulting from floods.

Comments

There are no comments yet for this post

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Choose a category: *

Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square! Please choose a category that best describes this story.

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields