|
|
|
Uploaded: Friday, May 9, 2008, 11:58 AM
Congratulations to the lookalike winners
Daisy Ng, and daughters Sarah and Jennifer were voted the winners by Weekly readers
|
|
by Emily Atwood
Pleasanton Weekly Staff
Photos
 
| Weekly readers voted and the winners of this year's Mother-Daughter Look-alike contest are Daisy Ng, and daughters Sarah, 14, and Jennifer, 10. They will receive a $50 gift certificate to Faz Restaurant.
Coming in a close second was Sue Barks and daughter Stephanie Deffner who were pictured at Deffner's wedding. Their prize is a $25 gift certificate to Stacey's Cafè.
Congratulations to the winners and thank you to all of the mothers and daughters who entered.
Fathers and sons—don't forget to send in your entries for our Father-Son Look-alike Contest. Entries are due by 8 a.m. May 19. Digitals may be sent to gallen@pleasantonweekly.com. Readers will be able to choose the winner in an upcoming issue and the winning picture will be published June 13. Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.
|
|
| Comments
|
Posted by Mike, a resident of the Highland Oaks neighborhood, on May 9, 2008 at 2:22 pm Congratulations. This is reassuring, and it benefits us to embrace the concept.
|
|
Posted by unclehomerr.., a resident of the Downtown neighborhood, on May 15, 2008 at 1:34 pm
What a nice picture of 3 lovely ladies. Congrat's!
unclehomerr..
|
|
Posted by chris, a resident of the Amberwood/Wood Meadows neighborhood, on May 15, 2008 at 4:41 pm I really thought the two ladies (one bride and her mom) would win....Wow, both beauitful and they only different was age.....Great picture!
|
|
Posted by Offended, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on May 19, 2008 at 10:11 pm Obviously YOUR mother never taught you any manners, Ed. Quite an offensive remark. I applauded the choice, as all three lovely ladies looked very beautiful in a radiant AND natural way. The bride/mother-of-the-bride that someone else thought should have won were also quite "handsome", but in a quite different, more artificially enhanced manner.
|
|
Posted by learn some manners, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on May 20, 2008 at 7:58 am
Wow! Artificially enhanced is not an offensive comment??
|
|
Posted by Hmmm, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on May 20, 2008 at 9:16 pm Touchy, are we? I think we can all agree that the use of makeup constitutes "artificially enhanced", and that the young/more mature bride/mother-of-the-bride photo *does* display the use of (some!) makeup...!
|
|
Posted by Kathy, a resident of the Foothill Knolls neighborhood, on May 29, 2008 at 11:28 am Offended, if you can't say anything nice don't say anything at all. You sound just like the guy who said the racist remake, except your comment is the kind insecure woman make to belittle other women. I don't know too many people who call makeup "Artificially enhanced" LOL
|
|
|
| |
|
Send this story
Print this story
