Support local journalism!
Help preserve local news coverage in print and online.
Become a member now!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Pleasanton, California Forecast

Pleasanton Weekly News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

Ice rink on Staples wins commission's OK
Sharks facility would be part of 17-acre park

Photo

Bookmark and Share
The city's Parks and Recreation Commission voted 5-0 Thursday night to recommend that the City Council approve a master plan for a new 17-acre community park on the yet-undeveloped Staples Ranch site that would include a 4-sheet recreational and club ice skating facility.

Staples Ranch is a 124 acre site at the southwest corner of I-580 and El Charro Road.

Without naming the operator of the ice rink, the commission's approval was clearly aimed at a proposal by the San Jose Arena Management company, a subsidiary of the San Jose Sharks hockey team.

The Sharks group has asked the city for approval of its plan to finance and operate a 116,000-square-foot facility on an a 7 acre site (including parking) in the new community park, public land that the Sharks would lease for $1 a year for 30 years.

The organization operates all of the facilities associated with the Sharks, including the HP Pavilion where the hockey team plays, and "Sharks Ice" rinks in San Jose and Fremont, which are similar to what the group plans for Pleasanton.

Although it endorsed the plan, the Parks and Recreation Commission added stipulations that could cost the Sharks much more than just the ice facility. The commission said the Sharks must also help pay for some or all of the costs of developing the new community park, which could add as much as $5 million to its construction bill, and also to contribute "significantly" to lighted sports fields in Phase 2 of development planned for the Bernal property, a 318-acre site where the first project, three baseball fields, is just now starting.

"Also, any approval of the plan we are recommending should stipulate that the Staples park and the ice rink are developed concurrently," insisted Parks and Recreation Commissioner Jerry Pentin.

Specific terms of the financial package will be worked out with City Manager Nelson Fialho and his staff in the coming weeks with the City Council expected to consider the plan at a meeting in late May or early June.

Don Gralnek, Vice President & General Counsel of Silicon Valley Sports & Entertainment LLC, who represents San Jose Arena Management, said the Sharks ice rink would offer everything related to any type of ice sports. These include both competitive and amateur hockey, hockey and skating teams for boys, girls, men and women, special ice hockey programs for the local high schools, figure skating, recreational skating and also special programs for the handicapped.

"We'll have competitive meets that will draw crowds from throughout the region, adding to the economic benefits to this community," he said.

The community park master plan approved Thursday is part of a four-phase overall plan being developed for the unincorporated 124-acre Staples Ranch, which is owned by Alameda County.

Hendrick Automotive plans to develop a new auto mall on the site at the intersection of I-580 and El Charro Road. CLC Continuum, a Southern California based senior care organization, plans to build 600-units on the western side of the property that will include independent living, assisted living and skilled nursing care units. A retail complex is planned for a site along El Charro that also will be next to the community park.

An environmental impact report (EIR) on the proposals for Staples Ranch is scheduled to be completed and released April 24. Public comments on the EIR must be made within 60 days of its release.

The council is then expected to make final decisions on the auto mall, continuing care facility, the retail center and the community park and ice rink, in that order. The plans will be wrapped into an overall master plan for Staples Ranch, which will then be annexed into Pleasanton.

"Until everything is in place and we know what the plans and approvals are, then we can't start deciding on the specifics of our proposal," Gralnek told commissions Thursday.

Staples would be the last major undeveloped site to come into the city until, and unless, Pleasanton adds more land on its eastern border. El Charro, still mostly a privately-owned road, eventually will be a major thoroughfare connecting the 580 freeway to Stanley Boulevard, with the Livermore city limits on one side and Pleasanton's on the other.

Besides the new Pleasanton auto mall at the El Charro-580 intersection, Livermore has approved a 180-store Prime Outlet mall on the southeast corner, directly across from Staples Ranch. The El Charro interchange will be widened to four lanes, with work to get underway later this year.

Although Staples Ranch will be annexed into Pleasanton, the City Council, in a memorandum of understanding, has agreed to allow Alameda County to continue to control a stretch of land at the end of Stoneridge Drive that would allow its extension through Staples to El Charro if a future City Council would favor the project.

Until then, Pleasanton residents, even those who live near the barricade where Stoneridge Drive now ends, would have to drive on 580 to El Charro to shop, dine, buy cars or visit residents at the continuing care facility. The Parks and Recreation Commission's new master plan for the community park, however, calls for a small public parking lot accessible at the barricade as well as a drop-off for skaters heading to the ice rink.

Other parts of the proposed community park that will not be directly accessible by car until Stoneridge Drive is extended include lighted tennis courts, a dog park and other recreational facilities, including a large central area of landscaped open space. To drive to those sections, motorists would have to use I-580.

"We've had many requests for an open meadow where kids can fly kites, families can have picnics or just walk around, and that's the intent in this park master plan," said Jim Wolfe, director of Parks and Community Services.

At its final public hearing on the issue, the Parks and Recreation Commission considered comments from scores of speakers and email messages from at least 50 others, with about 70 percent of those in favor of the park plan and the ice facility.

In written comments to the commission that were made public Thursday, several organizations endorsed the Sharks ice rink proposal, including the Pleasanton Chamber of Commerce and the Tri-Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB).

Amy Blaschka, president and chief executive officer of the CVB, said the ice facility would have significant and favorable economic impacts.

"Partnering with the Sharks Ice team on the proposed 4-rink Pleasanton Sharks Ice facility would provide approximately 9,900 booked hotel room nights annually which equates to nearly $4 million in estimated economic impact," Blaschka stated. "This infusion of cash to the local economy would not only benefit hotels but restaurants, retail and other businesses as well."

Several of the 60 or more comments by Pleasanton residents in favor of the Sharks Ice facility included:

Pete Schalkoord - "The program the Sharks run at Logitech in San Jose is always filled to the limit. We can have the same situation here in Pleasanton. Let's keep our kids in sports and approve this fantastic opportunity that the Sharks are bringing to this community."

Priscilla Barton: "I have skated in places all over the world and have seen amazing skating communities. Please support this project."

Pierre-Paul Allard: "Please give our Tri-Valley Blue Devils a new modern arena to play in and have fun. And give Pleasanton the sports facility we deserve."

Karen and Les Magoon: "Our children play ice hockey and the only available rink for many miles is the Dublin Ice Rink. It is very old and has no decent changing area of locker rooms."

Tom Powers: "What a great community amenity the ice rink will be to this community."

Debbie Look: "Our children and teens could benefit by having ice skating added as one of the components of their school's physical education program through regular trips to the ice rink during their PE classes."

Not everyone was so supportive, however. Although only two spoke against the proposed park plan and ice rink Thursday night, others sent emails critical of the proposal. They included:

Jon Violette: "I would hate to see this (ice rink facility at Staples Ranch) happen. It will only bring more traffic and congestion to Pleasanton."

Jacki and Dan Stewart: "our family does not want a large sport facility in our Valley such as the four rink ice facility suggested for Staples Ranch. That type of facility fits with San Ramon's and Dublin's urban sprawl plans."

Bimal Sangari: "I view the construction of the 4-rink ice facility as the construction of a regional attraction in my neighborhood that will draw people from the entire East Bay and perhaps even the Central Valley. Undoubtedly with additional traffic will come increased noise and air pollution and I do not see this as a stretch to expect a subsequent increase in crime eventually in our neighborhoods as a result of this."

Jon Davis: "I've been involved with ice rinks for 30 years and I can tell you that there is not nearly the market out there that SJAM attempts to say there is. All aspects of the ice rink industry are on the decline."

All comments made by emails or at the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting will be included in a full report on the discussion and actions by the commission that will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration at its May meeting on the Staples Park master plan.

Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.


Comments

Posted by Stacey, a resident of the Amberwood/Wood Meadows neighborhood, on Apr 12, 2008 at 1:55 pm

What a good idea to ask the Sharks to pay for the rest of the community park and get it built at the same time as the rink!

Mr. Sangari is correct that this will be a regional draw. I have to drive all the way to Redwood City to play ice hockey because the Dublin rink doesn't have a quality adult amateur hockey program. Interesting that Mr. Sangari is concerned about air pollution but doesn't see that driving to Redwood City is worse for the air than driving down the street. And I know I'm not the only one in the Tri-Valley driving that long distance to play ice hockey.

I don't agree with Mr. Sangari or Jon Violette that traffic will noticeably increase due to the ice rink. The shopping outlet planned by Livermore on the other side of El Charro will accomplish that much more than the ice rink (ie. people shop more than ice skate).


Posted by Resident, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Apr 12, 2008 at 9:35 pm

I think the ice rink is a great idea! I will certainly bring my kids there!


Posted by Jerry, a resident of the Oak Hill neighborhood, on Apr 13, 2008 at 2:23 am

Stacy, you're not one of those "put um through the glass" persons are you....

Inquiring minds want to know - what position do you play? My moneys on "goalie" or maybe "power foward". :)


Posted by Rick, a resident of the Vintage Hills Elementary School neighborhood, on Apr 13, 2008 at 8:51 am

I have these questions regarding the rink because the sharks are getting some very valuable land in this deal.

1. I the land being donated to the sharks in exchange for building the park?

2. How much will the sharks contribute toward park facilities? The article says "a significant amount".

2. Who will own the rink? The city or the Sharks or both?

3. What are the projected tax revenues the the city can expect ?

4. What are the costs to the city expected to be for traffic and police and fire etc....

I hope someone can answer these questions.


Posted by Stacey, a resident of the Amberwood/Wood Meadows neighborhood, on Apr 13, 2008 at 1:58 pm

Jerry,

I've played all positions but goalkeeper. I'm not that good at center, but it is fun to play sometimes. I think I do well at defense. :)


Posted by neighbor, a resident of another community, on Apr 15, 2008 at 9:43 pm

Jerry,

Your comment is inappropriate for this post. Please comment about the ice rink and not of other people.


Posted by PToWN94566, a member of the Walnut Grove Elementary School community, on Apr 15, 2008 at 9:54 pm

What is the point in putting in another ice rink when there is one in Dublin? Unless if that one is closing I don't see a need. But if or when the new one is built, I could see the older one in Dublin shutting it's doors.


Posted by Jerry, a resident of the Oak Hill neighborhood, on Apr 16, 2008 at 12:09 am

Neighbor,

If my comment is "inappropriate" and in violation of the Town Square "TERMS OF USE", please report me to those in charge and ask to have my comment removed. You can find the method for doing so at the bottom of "TERMS OF USE". :)


Posted by Paul, a resident of the Foothill Knolls neighborhood, on Apr 16, 2008 at 9:39 am

I've skated around in the arena industry as an owner/manager/consultant/player/coach/unameit here in the Bay Area for the past 20 odd so I'll give everyone the real heads up.

Personally, I've lost more money in this business than many earn in a lifetime.

I still have passion for the ice and the business, so I continue to promote ice skating through Holiday Ice venues etc.

In California, real estate is so valuable that it has become mission impossible to build new fulltime ice arenas.

Because we live in a fantastic climate and a diversified recreation region, ice skating arenas barely survive the competition from the more traditional sport activities.

Throughout North America, the National Hockey League has identified this issue and is now encouraging their local affiliates (Sharks) to develop community ice centers to help to promote the game of hockey and to bring the people a wonderful facilit addition for their cities.

Look no further than Dallas or Phoenix to see the success of this plan and the snowball effect it's created throughout Texas and Arizona.

Question: Will Dublin Iceland suffer at the hands of the new 4 ice rinks at Staples Ranch?

Answer: The ice skating community can work together to plan ahead and keep all of the ice centers open. We need more ice, not less ice.

Question: When the Oakland Ice Center opened, did it close Berkeley Iceland?

Answer: No. Berkeley Iceland developed new hockey and skating programs which in turn, put hundreds of new skaters on the ice.

Question: Why did Berkeley Iceland close?

Answer: They were cited by the city as having an unsafe refrigeration system and required changes that the Iceland Corp. could not afford.

Take it from this 45 year hockey vet.

These are the facts that many already know.

The Ice Arena business is not profitable.

Otherwise, we would see rinks everywhere.

Dozens of ice arenas in North America are now facing more difficult economic impacts and have either closed or may face closure very soon.

The financial power of the NHL and it's revenues from corporate sponsors through their affiliates are the solution to building and providing the public with community ice facilities.

Sorry for the run on, but I just want to help.

I fully support the efforts of our friends with SJAM and believe that we can work together to make their new facility the pride of Pleasanton.

Let's work together and build the ice for our future generations to enjoy.

FYI. Ice Oasis is up for sale.


Posted by Stacey, a resident of the Amberwood/Wood Meadows neighborhood, on Apr 16, 2008 at 9:09 pm

Jerry is my good-natured sparring partner!


Posted by , a resident of Livermore, on Apr 28, 2008 at 11:00 am

Good for Pleasanton! Is it true that this facility could include roller hockey, indoor soccer and box lacrosse? Livermore blew their chance several years ago. Take this opportunity and run with it!


Posted by John, a resident of Dublin, on May 12, 2008 at 1:42 pm

I truly hope this plan takes place. I drive out to the San Jose logitech ice arena at least twice a week. Once to play and the other for practice. The Dublin rink is old and lacks resources. They do not offer practice time or even a real league. The league offered for adults are contracted out to individuals. The San Jose rink is very professional. Leagues are created for all ages and offer lots of classes for those taking the first steps. I think all can tell from my passion on this plan and really hope it becomes reality.

John


Posted by Laura, a resident of another community, on May 12, 2008 at 2:44 pm

my husband and I drive to san jose and fremont ice weekly for our hockey games. what a relief it will be to cut our drive in half. i support the new pleasanton rink!


Posted by Nicole, a resident of Livermore, on Sep 13, 2008 at 8:06 pm

As a former skater, I would love to be near a rink with ice time available. The Dublin rink is not too far, but it is old and their public sessions are limited.

It would be wonderful to bring my children into the world of skating closer Livermore.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: *
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

PleasantonWeekly.com ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.