Support local journalism!
Help preserve local news coverage in print and online.
Become a member now!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Pleasanton, California Forecast

Pleasanton Weekly News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

Councilman Thorne blasts 'elitists' over efforts to block Staples Ranch, Stoneridge Drive projects
Warns that county could move 124-acre site to Livermore if Pleasanton's open space initiative proceeds

Photo

Bookmark and Share
Pleasanton City Councilman Jerry Thorne has issued a special "Alert," predicting dire consequences for the city and taxpayers if a proposed initiative affecting development plans for Staples Ranch proceeds.

Thorne said that the so-called "Greenbelt Initiative," co-sponsored by Pleasanton residents Matt Morrison and Anne Fox, would cancel out a Memorandum of Understanding between the city and Alameda County over the eventual development of the 124-acre Staples Ranch.

The site, located in unincorporated Alameda County, could be annexed into Pleasanton according to the agreement with the development of an auto mall, a retail center, a 600-800-unit apartment and assisted living complex for seniors and an indoor ice rink proposed by a subsidiary of the San Jose Sharks.

Thorne's alert, sent by email to several thousand civic and business leaders, comes at the same time that City Attorney Michael Roush approved language in the co-sponsors' second initiative that contains the same open space restrictions for Staples Ranch, but would allow the use of 40 acres for an auto mall. Since the newest measure is an initiative by itself, the co-sponsors actually have two initiatives in play, with a requirement that they obtain signatures from at least 10 percent of registered voters who cast ballots in the November 2006 election--or about 3,500--to qualify either measure for a public vote.

"I met with our county supervisor, Scott Haggerty, today and I am saddened to report that he intends to move forward with the processes necessary (EIR, etc.) to develop the Staples Ranch property in the county (probably with a tax sharing agreement with Livermore or Dublin for services)," Thorne stated in his Alert.

"Other options available to him would include the development of the property within Livermore or Dublin," Thorne added. "He indicated to me that he is 'running out of time' and cannot continue to work with Pleasanton under the threat of the two initiatives recently filed."

Thorne added: "I did let him know about 'Pleasanton First' and that we are working hard to prevent the initiatives from getting the required signatures over the next 180 days and that we support completing the elements contained in the current MOU with Pleasanton."

He has agreed to meet with us on July 19 at the meeting we have already set up at the Hop Yard Ale House at 4 p.m."

"To be very blunt," Thorne stated, "the supervisor, the county, our neighbors and most of us are fed up with the handful of elitists that have been dominating the agenda on Stoneridge and the Staples Ranch property. It's time to put Pleasanton first."

Thorne said Haggerty has agreed to meet with backers of Pleasanton First, a citizens group opposed to the open space initiatives, to review their progress in defeating the signature-gathering efforts. The meeting will be held at 4 p.m. July 19 at The Hop Yard Alehouse & Grill, 3015-H Hopyard Rd.

Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.


Comments

Posted by Steve, a resident of the Vineyard Hills neighborhood, on Jul 11, 2007 at 7:00 pm

Friends of… People for… Pleasanton First… Concerned Pleasanton…

ENOUGH!!!!

Ten people with one name sway our City leaders far too often. You included Mr. Thorne. It’s not just the money… Listen to the needs of the total community. We have very healthily financial reserves we are told. May I suggest we use some of the monies to survey and understand the real desires/needs of Pleasanton. Don’t leave every critical decision to our elitist City leaders and the creatively named conclaves of Pleasanton. One voice with a good plan is better than ten voices with a bad one. Stop the special interests running our town!


Posted by pookie, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Jul 14, 2007 at 4:13 pm

I agree with steven!

Let's replace these "leaders" with people who care!


Posted by Youth Sports Parent, a resident of the West of Foothill neighborhood, on Jul 16, 2007 at 4:54 pm

Let's replace these "leaders" with people who care!

We just did.

Only the results of our election are not as some would prefer and are making it difficult for this town to develop needed facilities.

We have competition for field uses on all of our sports parks.

The shortage is actually causing some families to choose not to play.

All the communities in the Tri-Valley are developing fields for sports use except Pleasanton.

It's our turn.

Stop talking.

We need sports facilities now!


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: *
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

PleasantonWeekly.com ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.