Sign up for Express
Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!


PleasantonWeekly.com Town Square Google
Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Pleasanton, California Forecast

Pleasanton Weekly News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

Appeals court will reconsider challenge to county fair gun ban
Long-running lawsuit filed in 1999 by gun show promoters

Share
A federal appeals court in San Francisco announced Wednesday that it will reconsider whether Alameda County's ban on gun shows at the annual county fair in Pleasanton is constitutional.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said an 11-judge panel will review a decision in which a three-judge panel upheld the ban in April. The expanded panel will hear arguments in San Francisco in September and will issue a ruling at a later date.

The case before the court is a long-running lawsuit filed in 1999 by gun show promoters Russell and Sallie Nordyke of Willows in Glenn County.

They claim the rule against gun shows at the county fair violates their constitutional First Amendment right of free speech and Second Amendment right to bear arms.

Their attorney, Donald Kilmer of San Jose, wrote in a brief submitted to the appeals court that the Nordykes and their supporters are "law-abiding citizens who want to conduct safe and historically well-regulated gun shows in a public forum."

The Alameda County ordinance prohibits most gun possessions on county property, and the Nordykes claim it has the effect of banning gun shows at the fair.

The county Board of Supervisors enacted the ordinance in 1999 after a 1998 fair shooting in which eight people were injured.

The earlier 9th Circuit ruling in April came in the wake of a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision that said the Second Amendment right to bear arms provides an individual right to possess guns for self-defense and that citizens could challenge federal gun laws.

The 9th Circuit panel said the citizens have the right to challenge state and local laws as well. But the court also said the Alameda County rule was justified as a public safety measure.

After the court asked both sides in May to submit briefs on whether it should rehear the case, Alameda County lawyers urged the court to continue to uphold the ban but to reconsider whether citizens can challenge state and local laws.

On the other side, the Nordykes asked the court to strike down the ban but to keep in place the conclusion that lawsuits against state and local laws should be allowed.

Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.


Comments
There are no comments yet for this story.
Be the first!

Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: *
Choose a category: *
Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square!
Please choose a category below that best describes this story.

Comment: *
This will be replaced by the player.
Visit TheScottishGames.com for more information
 

Pleasanton Weekly ©2010 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.