Support local journalism!
Help preserve local news coverage in print and online.
Become a member now!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Pleasanton, California Forecast

Pleasanton Weekly News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

Zone 7 water agency inches toward independence
Supervisors express concerns over rates, flood control

Photo

Bookmark and Share
Would an independent Zone 7 water agency result in higher or lower rates for residents?

Zone 7 representatives say that separating from Alameda County would remove a layer of administration resulting in lower rates. But Supervisor Scott Haggerty said Tuesday night that this would not necessarily be the case.

In the past, Alameda County has turned down an enhanced retirement benefit for Zone 7, Haggerty told the several dozen people who attended the meeting.

"If Zone 7 separates and gives the enhanced retirement benefit, I'm not sure the rates wouldn't be raised," he added.

Zone 7, which already sets its own salaries, has reported that raising employee contributions for higher benefits in order to keep employer contributions stable was discussed at a meeting in 2007 but no more discussions have taken place.

"I've never seen if you create another bureaucracy that rates wouldn't go up," Haggerty said.

At Tuesday's meeting, which was held at the County Public Works Agency in Dublin to get input from the public, Haggerty and Supervisor Nate Miley expressed concerns about coordinating flood control between Zone 7 and the rest of Alameda County.

Zone 7 participates in the Bay Area Flood Protection Agencies Association, and it represents the Flood Protection/Stormwater Management Functional Area for the entire Bay Area.

"The mission is to provide an effective flood control system for the Livermore-Amador Valley in a fiscally responsible, innovative, proactive and environmentally sensitive manner," Zone 7 General Manager Jill Duerig said in her presentation. "We try to leverage the money we have by working with others."

Zone 7 provides water to more than 200,000 people in Pleasanton, Livermore, Dublin and the Dougherty Valley in San Ramon, as well as managing local run-off and groundwater. It imports 80% of the water from the South Bay Aqueduct, which is run by the state.

The seven-member Zone 7 board of directors is elected by Alameda County residents; separating from the county would enable Dougherty Valley residents to run for the board and vote for its members, Duerig said.

"Through its retailer, Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD), Zone 7 serves over 15,000 residents in Dougherty Valley, in south San Ramon within Contra Costa County," she said. "With separation, they would no longer be disenfranchised."

DSRSD Board Member Georgeen Vonheeder Leopold read a letter supporting Zone 7 separating from the county. It noted that in addition to creating equality for Dougherty Valley, it would eliminate the duplication of services.

Jill Ray of Contra Costa Supervisor Candace Andersen's office also spoke to express Andersen's concern that Dougherty Valley residents currently do not have a say with Zone 7.

Supervisors Miley and Haggerty also had opinions about how the separation should be done.

"The county doesn't want it to happen piecemeal," Miley said. "We want it to be comprehensive, thorough and complete. Fiscal implications must be resolved."

"LAFCO (Local Agency Formation Commission) is the appropriate venue for this to be vetted," he added. "I want this to go to LAFCO. Any attempt to go by LAFCO, I would oppose."

He noted that the county has had other entities separate from it, such as Alameda County Medical Center.

"I know it isn't going to happen quickly," he said. "It's not a sprint, it's a marathon. I want to make sure the county is maintaining its integrity as well."

"I'm supportive of this separation but want to see it done right," Haggerty said. "I want to see a comprehensive plan."

He noted that giving Dougherty Valley a say in the running of Zone 7 does not guarantee that one of its residents will be elected to a seat on the board.

Miley suggested a meeting between Alameda and Contra Costa counties.

Duerig said after the meeting that because Zone 7 has existed since 1957 and has always worked incrementally toward separation, that she had not thought it needed to start with LAFCO but if the supervisors are more comfortable with that route, she was amenable.

Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.


Comments

Posted by Brad, a resident of the Birdland neighborhood, on Mar 7, 2013 at 9:41 am

Employee pension contributions have not been discussed since 2007 ??? Are they kidding? how does THAT demonstrate fiscal responsibility?

When have you ever seen another governmental created and the administrative costs NOT go up.?

Do you really want bureaucratic independence?

This is a simple no thank you


Posted by Aaron M. Webster, a resident of another community, on Mar 8, 2013 at 9:08 am

Brad,

Zone 7 independence from the county will not create "another bureaucracy" it will remove one. The Zone currently operates as a semi-independent organization. However some everyday functions such as purchasing and HR are internal to Zone 7 and external to Alameda county. Imagine going to Target and having to check out twice. Zone 7 is an organization dedicated to efficiency and reliability.

Also the citizens of South San Ramon should be hopping mad that they experience "taxation" with out representation.

AMW


Posted by Matt Morrison, a resident of the Pleasanton Meadows neighborhood, on Mar 11, 2013 at 3:22 am

Aaron, the residents of South San Ramon have representation through the Dublin San Ramon Services District. DSRSD negotiated the crazy water deal for that development as a customer of Zone 7. It's too bad residents there have to pay a premium for their water, but Zone 7's mission is to serve the residents of eastern Alameda County - NOT to subsidize Contra Costa County sprawl.


Posted by Zone 7 expansion agenda, a resident of the Birdland neighborhood, on Mar 11, 2013 at 10:59 am

Zone 7's 'indepedence' agenda is to provide water to Contra Costa County sprawl developments like they did for Dougherty Valley (and they were sued for doing that because their bylaws say they will serve Alameda County residents).

Zone 7 wants the entire Tassajara Valley developed. They want to provide water for that area while leaving Alameda County residents 'high and dry.'


Posted by Fact Checker, a resident of the Downtown neighborhood, on Mar 18, 2013 at 11:33 am

Not once has Zone 7 (board or staff) expressed any interest in wanting to develop the Tassajara Valley or providing any water there.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: *
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

PleasantonWeekly.com ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.