|
|
|
Uploaded: Tuesday, September 25, 2012, 6:44 AM Updated: Friday, September 28, 2012, 6:06 AM
Study continues on reopening waterslides
Park District getting ready to ask for project bids
|
|
by Dolores Fox Ciardelli
Pleasanton Weekly Staff
Photo
 | A report on the Shadow Cliffs waterslides has concluded that the popular facility could be reopened after repairs are made to the electrical equipment, decks and fences, plunge pools and to the slides themselves.
"The cost estimate for the renovation work would be $1.4 million when you add up all the engineering costs, permitting, inspection," said Jim O'Connor, assistant general manager of the East Bay Regional Park District.
O'Connor reviewed the report by Water Ventures, a water park developer based in Lake Forest, with the Park District operations committee on Thursday.
"This is a private firm we hired to do an evaluation and report," O'Connor said. "We wanted to get folks that work in this business to do this."
The next step is for the Park District to develop a "request for proposal" so companies can submit bids to renovate the popular facility. The committee will review the request at its Oct. 10 meeting, then it will be posted and the Park District will wait for bids on the project, O'Connor said.
"They will be due back to us sometime in mid to late November, then in January we'll take our recommendations to the committee," O'Connor said. "If it's approved to move forward we'll take it to the full board in February."
O'Connor was doubtful that the waterslides could reopen for the 2012 season since the developer would need to have funding in place to get permits, including a building permit from Pleasanton, health and safety permits as well as others from the county that would require inspections.
"It's a hybrid between a public pool and an amusement park," O'Connor noted. "State laws will apply as well."
The Rapids waterslides were opened in 1981 by Glenn Kierstad under a 25-year contract. After its expiration, the operation continued with year-to-year agreements.
Inspections last winter, when the waterslides were always closed, led the Park District to conclude that the facility had too many safety issues to open for the 2012 season. Park administrators recommended at a March meeting that the slides be closed permanently in light of the fact that the district's long-term land use plan called for them to be phased out in another 10 years.
The Park District instead instructed staff to reevaluate the site and put out bids for its renovation/rebuilding and operation.
At a meeting held at the Veterans Memorial Building in Pleasanton in June, Mimi Waluch, revenue and administration manager with the Park District, said the district had estimated it would cost $6.4 million to replace the facility, but original operator Kierstad also addressed the committee to say he estimated it would cost $280,000 to bring the facility up to snuff. He also explained that when he was put on a year-to-year lease he could not afford to make capital improvements.
Kierstad said that Rapids waterslides brought $90,000 per season in concession and parking fees to the Park District.
The concession area is about 3.5 acres and includes the four waterslides, a maintenance building, office, storage, separate men's and women's restrooms with dressing areas and lockers, and a picnic area with a shade structure, picnic tables and barbeques. Structures also must be made ADA compliant.
"It was great facility for many, many years, especially for the folks in Pleasanton," O'Connor said Friday, "But my job is to make sure that what happens in the future will be safe."
The Water Ventures report will be on the Park District website, www.ebparks.org, late next week, said O'Connor.
Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.
|
|
| Comments
|
Posted by Larry, a resident of Livermore, on Sep 25, 2012 at 8:59 am Let's see here, $6.4 Million dollars to replace the facility.
$1.4 Million to do the repairs by a company out of Chicago.
$280,000 by Glenn Kierstad, the guy that has been running the park for almost 30 years.
So the guy that is in the trenches and knows more then anyone else, thinks it can be done for less then $300k. I say split the difference with him, and give him another 25 year contract. Problem solved.
|
|
Posted by Root of the Problem, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Sep 25, 2012 at 12:26 pm The root of this issue is the leftists that run EBRPD. They hate the idea of a park that people can use, especially one where a contractor can make money providing a desired service to the public. EBRPD wants to turn this into some kind of nature-style area, which will then provide a job for a leftist "Naturalist" employee of EBRPD. The initial $6.4 million estimate was designed to show how unfeasible it was to continue the water-slide park. Only because many of our neighbors complained, did EBRPD agree to pay the consultant to reevaluate the cost. It is now down to $1.4 million. The difference between this estimate and the operator's number of $280k is probably the cost of the numerous permits, inspections, etc., etc., etc.
Remember, this is the government YOU elected. Think about that come November!
|
|
Posted by Arroyo, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Sep 25, 2012 at 11:26 pm @Root
"Amen"
Just what the kids don't need, another Nature Interpretive Center.
|
|
|
| |
|