News


PG&E indicted on criminal charges for 2010 San Bruno pipeline explosion

Penalty, fine could total $2.45-billion in after-tax fund.

PG&E Co. was indicted by a federal grand jury in San Francisco Tuesday on 12 criminal charges of violating a U.S. pipeline safety law, including several counts specifically related to the fatal explosion of a natural gas pipeline in San Bruno in 2010.

The indictment alleges the San Francisco-based utility company "knowingly and willfully" violated requirements of the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968 for maintaining adequate records, evaluating risks of pipeline corrosion and leaks, and prioritizing and addressing potential threats between 2003 and 2010.

The rupture of a high-pressure PG&E transmission pipeline known as Line 132 and the subsequent explosion and fire in San Bruno on Sept. 9, 2010, killed eight people, injured 58 others, destroyed 38 houses and damaged 70 other buildings.

The segment of the line that ruptured was installed in approximately 1956 and had a defective seam weld, but was incorrectly listed in PG&E records as seamless, the indictment said.

"Pacific Gas and Electric Co. knowingly and willfully failed to gather and integrate existing data and information on a line, specifically Line 132, that could be relevant to identifying and evaluating all potential threats on covered segments of that line," the grand jury charged in the first of the 12 counts.

Other counts in the indictment accuse the company of failing to maintain records on repairs to Line 132, failing to evaluate potential threats, failing to select the most suitable method to assess potential threats and failing to prioritize high-risk segments of the line.

Other counts carry similar charges related to two other lines.

U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag said no date has been set thus far for the company's arraignment before a federal magistrate.

If PG&E is convicted, the penalty for each count would be a fine up to $500,000 or the amount of either the loss caused to victims or the financial gain the company made as a result of the violation.

The indictment was expected because PG&E Co. and its holding-company parent, PG&E Corp., announced in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission last week that they anticipated criminal charges because settlement negotiations had been unsuccessful.

"The citizens of Northern California deserve to have their utility providers put the safety of the community first," Haag said in a statement.

The indictment "reflects the company's failure to follow that very basic principle," she said.

PG&E Corp. said in a release that it will seek to demonstrate during court proceedings that the charges "have no merit," while staying focused on its goal of "building the safest and most reliable natural gas system in the country."

"San Bruno was a tragic accident. We've taken accountability and are deeply sorry. We have worked hard to do the right thing for victims, their families and the community, and we will continue to do so," said PG&E Corp. Chairman Tony Earley, who was brought in to lead the company after the explosion.

The company said it believes its employees did not intentionally violate the law.

San Bruno Mayor Jim Ruane called the indictment "a measure of justice" and said PG&E should be strongly penalized by both the federal court system and the California Public Utilities Commission.

"One of the worst natural gas disasters in American history was caused by PG&E's gross misconduct. PG&E and its executives should get the harshest penalty to prevent this from ever happening again," said Ruane.

In an administrative proceeding, the Public Utilities Commission is currently considering how much to fine PG&E for record-keeping and safety-compliance failures.

San Bruno has urged the commission to levy the maximum allowable penalty and fine, a total of $2.45 billion in after-tax funds.

PG&E provides natural gas and electricity to 15 million customers in Northern and Central California. It operates 6,000 miles of high-pressure natural-gas transmission pipelines as well as 40,000 miles of smaller distribution lines that deliver gas to houses and commercial buildings, the indictment said.

The company has previously settled claims of nearly $500 million with the victims and their families and is inspecting, repairing and retrofitting pipelines and converting paper records to a digital system, PG&E said.

— Bay City News Service

Comments

Posted by Bob, a resident of Foothill Knolls
on Apr 2, 2014 at 6:55 am

I wonder who gets that money. I doubt it'll go towards the people actually affected by the blast.


Posted by Moral Freddy, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Apr 2, 2014 at 7:13 am

No government agency is a good agency. PG and E should model itself after Hobby Lobby. Bring morality back into government ... like exists in Hobby Lobby.

p.s. Impeach Obama

p.p.s. This message has been approved by PW Censorship Board.


Posted by liberalism is a disease, a resident of Birdland
on Apr 2, 2014 at 8:20 am

liberalism is a disease is a registered user.

Any chance that once they get fined, they pow those charges back through our bills? Nah, a power monopoly would never do that, just like private industry having to absorb higher taxes and regulation fees.


Posted by Mike, a resident of Highland Oaks
on Apr 2, 2014 at 7:09 pm

We need power.

Mike


Posted by liberalism is a disease, a resident of Birdland
on Apr 3, 2014 at 8:30 am

liberalism is a disease is a registered user.

immoral freddy, I'm glad you're Ok with PGE charging you more because you condone their ineptitude and lack of concern for their ratepayers. I hear you can buy property in San Bruno for pennies on the dollar, so please move there immediately. Enjoy the gas heat.


Posted by Chemist, a resident of Downtown
on Apr 3, 2014 at 9:45 am

PG&E is a REGULATED monopoly. We know the dangers of granting monopoly power to any company, and that is why we regulate monopolies. If, for the past decade, PG&E has not properly followed the law, why isn't the PUC being sued for criminal activity? It is the PUC that has been given the public trust; we know we cannot trust PG&E.


Posted by Moral Freddy, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Apr 3, 2014 at 10:14 am

(Comment deemed inappropriate by Pleasanton Weekly Online staff)


Posted by Eric, a resident of Val Vista
on Apr 3, 2014 at 12:10 pm

We all know PG&E should pay the max fines possible but we also know that they will be able to reduce the fines even though they FUBARED the whole mess.PG&E needs an overhaul from the top down along with getting rid of every current member of the CPUC who allowed this FUBAR to happen by not doing their jobs.And to make matters worse these morons on the CPUC are allowing PG&E to pass on the costs to upgrade the faulty gas system to PG&E's customers when new rates were approved.


Posted by Dan, a resident of Mohr Park
on Apr 3, 2014 at 4:41 pm

Good...find those responsible and fine them personally and give them jail time. They killed 8 innocent people. To fine the company only to have the rate payers pay the fine is an insult. These people need to be held liable for their actions.


Posted by Moral Freddy, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Apr 3, 2014 at 5:07 pm

(Post makes no sense and has been removed by Pleasanton Weekly Online staff.)


Posted by (DR.) EDWARD SIEGEL, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Apr 3, 2014 at 8:01 pm

(Post makes no sense and has been removed by Pleasanton Weekly Online staff.)


Posted by PW Online Staff, a resident of Downtown
on Apr 3, 2014 at 8:16 pm

(Post makes no sense and has been removed by Pleasanton readers and contributors of Town Forum.)


Posted by Mr. Geeneyuss, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Apr 4, 2014 at 4:37 pm

Boy, to have your posts deemed "to make no sense" by the PW staff must be a badge of honor to some.

I only make no sense after 7:00 PM on a Friday night.

Cheers P-Town!


Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore
on Apr 4, 2014 at 6:53 pm

Hi Mr. Greenyuss...not to worry about the "Right" or "liberalism is a disease" because both are mentally ill and can only relate to others in a vertical way. Unless they imply that they have a weapon/gun there's no need to report them to the Pleasanton Police Department or to Kamala Harris the State Attorney General in Sacramento...sad but true.

Welcome to the Town Square Blog!


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

‘Much Ado’ or is it Adios for ObamaCare?
By Tom Cushing | 36 comments | 1,170 views

Political posturing about water
By Tim Hunt | 7 comments | 841 views

Backpacked with care is back
By Roz Rogoff | 2 comments | 524 views