News


Prop. 8 sponsors appeal to U.S. Supreme Court to uphold state's same-sex marriage ban

Plea argues that that individual states should be allowed to define marriage

As promised, supporters of California's Proposition 8 appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court Tuesday to uphold the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage.

The petition to the high court states that whether marriage should be redefined to include same-sex couples is "a profoundly important question" and "a matter of great debate in our nation."

The appeal argues that individual states should be allowed to define marriage because the U.S. Constitution neither requires nor condemns gay marriage.

"Rather, it leaves the definition of marriage in the hands of the people, to be resolved through the democratic process in each state," the petition asserts.

Proposition 8, enacted by state voters in 2008, provides that "only marriage between a man and woman is valid or recognized in California."

It has been declared unconstitutional by a federal trial judge and a federal appeals court in San Francisco, but the measure has been left in place and same-sex marriages have been blocked during the appeals process.

The petition for a hearing before the high court was filed by the initiative's sponsors and their committee, Protect Marriage.

The Supreme Court is expected to decide this fall whether to take up the case. If it decides to hear the appeal, its decision would be expected by the end of June 2013.

If the panel does not take up the appeal, then a ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this year striking down Proposition 8

would become the final decision in the case, and same-sex weddings could resume.

Gay and lesbian marriages were briefly legal in California for several months in 2008 until voters approved Proposition 8 in November of that year. During that time, 18,000 same-sex couples married, and the California Supreme Court has ruled that those marriages remain valid.

The federal court rulings have been made in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed in 2009 by two same-sex couples.

Julia Cheever, Bay City News

— Bay City News Service

Comments

 +   Like this comment
Posted by liberalism is a disease
a resident of Birdland
on Aug 1, 2012 at 8:42 am

liberalism is a disease is a registered user.

It's way past the time when same sex partners create their own institution and call it whatever they want instead of trying to act like they will ever be the same as heterosexual, married couples. Separate, but equal?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Steve
a resident of Parkside
on Aug 1, 2012 at 8:57 am

Your so right, Diseased. This country would be so much better if blacks would go back to wear they belong, women would recognize that their proper place is to serve there husbands, and gays would accept how their disease makes them less than equal.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by liberalism is a disease
a resident of Birdland
on Aug 1, 2012 at 10:08 am

liberalism is a disease is a registered user.

'steve', you're certainly right on 2 of your three assertions. I'll let you guess which two. Hint: they both involve the word 'exit'.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Cholo
a resident of Livermore
on Aug 3, 2012 at 12:00 pm

I say live 'n let live...HOORAY!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ur a Bigot
a resident of Canyon Meadows
on Aug 4, 2012 at 10:48 pm

liberalism is a disease is a member, ah geez, do you really think that "...same sex partners create their own institution" How about that hetros, like you and me, never created our "own institution"? Marriage was and is, an institutional concept.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

CIA’s Five Stages of Woe
By Tom Cushing | 30 comments | 1,609 views

Where's the wind?
By Roz Rogoff | 2 comments | 681 views